Abstract
Understanding the effects of power distribution, particularly women’s decision making, on human development is important. This study used a set of direct measures of decision-making power from the Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement Survey and examined the relationship between women’s decision-making power and the food budget share, nutrition and child schooling. It found that in Pakistan, the relationship between women’s decision-making power and nutrition was not linear and varied depending on rural or urban residence. There was no clear evidence that higher women’s decision-making power would lead to better nutrition availability in Pakistan, but overall households were more likely to consume less grain and more vegetables. When women had higher decision-making power, children, particularly rural girls, were more likely to be enrolled in school.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The male head of households were interviewed by a male enumerator separately.
If a husband makes the decision by himself, he is considered to have decision-making power equal to 1; if a husband “jointly makes the decision,” he is considered to have decision-making power equal to 0.5; if a husband was not involved at all in the decision making, he is considered to have decision-making power equal to 0.
The t test results are available upon request.
The slight U shape at the left tail is due to the outliers of log per capita expenditure.
Individual school enrollment is defined based on the question “Did… enroll in school /institution last year?” It is defined as 1 if the answer is “yes” and 0 if the answer is “no.”.
References
Adato, M., de la Briere, B., Mindek, D., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2003). The impact of PROGRESA on women’s status and intrahousehold relations. In A. R. Quisumbing (Ed.), Household decisions, gender, and development: A synthesis of recent research. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Allendorf, K. (2007). Do women’s land rights promote empowerment and child health in Nepal? World Development, 35(11), 1975–1988. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.12.005.
Amin, S. (1997). The poverty–purdah trap in rural Bangladesh: Implications for women’s roles in the family. Development and Change, 28(2), 213–233. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00041.
Attanasio, O., & Lechene, V. (2002). Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Review of Economic Dynamics, 5(4), 720–748. doi:10.1006/redy.2002.0191.
Basu, K. (2006). Gender and say: A model of household behaviour with endogenously determined balance of power. The Economic Journal, 116(511), 558–580. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01092.x.
Becker, G. S. (1981). Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica, 48(189), 1–15. doi:10.2307/2552939.
Binder, M. (1999). Schooling indicators during Mexico’s “Lost decade”. Economics of Education Review, 18(2), 183–199. doi:10.1016/s0272-7757(98)00028-4.
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). Simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287–1294. doi:10.2307/1911963.
Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(368), 829–836. doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038.
Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1983). Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika, 70(1), 1–10. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.1.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.
Doss, C. (2006). The effects of intrahousehold property ownership on expenditure patterns in Ghana. Journal of African Economies, 15(1), 149–180. doi:10.1093/jae/eji025.
Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review, 17(1), 1–25. doi:10.1093/wber/lhg013.
Felkey, A. J. (2013). Husbands, wives and the peculiar economics of household public goods. European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 445–465. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2012.56.
Friedberg, L., & Webb, A. (2006). Determinants and consequences of bargaining power in households. NBER Working Paper 12367, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w12367.
Friedman, J., Hong, S., & Hou, X. (2012). The impact of food crisis on consumption and caloric availability in Pakistan—evidence from cross-section and panel data. World Bank HNP Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gitter, S. R., & Barham, B. L. (2008). Women’s power, conditional cash transfers, and schooling in Nicaragua. World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 271–290. doi:10.1093/wber/lhn006.
Hakim, A., & Aziz, A. (1998). Socio-cultural, religious, and political aspects of the status of women in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 37(4), 727–746.
Hallman, K. (2000). Mother-father resource control, marriage payments, and girl-boy health in rural Bangladesh. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper, No. 93. Washington, DC: International Food Policy and Research Institute.
Hamid, S., Johansson, E., & Rubenson, B. (2009). “Who am I? Where am I?” Experiences of married young women in a slum in Islamabad, Pakistan. BMC Public Health, 9, 265. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-265.
Hamid, S., Johansson, E., & Rubenson, B. (2010). Security lies in obedience—Voices of young women of a slum in Pakistan. BMC Public Health, 10, 164. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-164.
Hoddinott, J., & Haddad, L. (1995). Does female income share influence household expenditures? Evidence from Côte d’ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(1), 77–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1995.tb00028.x.
Hoddinott, J., & Skoufias, E. (2004). The impact of PROGRESA on food consumption. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53, 37–61. doi:10.1086/423252.
Hou, X. (2010). Challenges for youth employment in Pakistan: Are they youth-specific. Pakistan Development Review, 49(3), 193–212. doi:10.2307/41261044.
Hou, X. (2011). Women’s decision making power and human development: Evidence from Pakistan. In Policy research working paper series. RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:5830. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Hou, X., & Ma, N. (2012). The effect of women’s decision-making power on maternal health services uptake: Evidence from Pakistan. Health Policy and Planning, 28(2), 176–184. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs042.
Lancaster, G., Maitra, P., & Ray, R. (2006). Endogenous intra-household balance of power and its impact on expenditure patterns: Evidence from India. Economica, 73(291), 435–460. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00502.x.
Maitra, P. (2004). Parental bargaining, health inputs and child mortality in India. Journal of health economics, 23(2), 259–291. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.09.002.
Maitra, P., & Ray, R. (2002). The joint estimation of child participation in schooling and employment: Comparative evidence from three continents. Oxford Development Studies, 30(1), 41–62. doi:10.1080/136008101200114895.
Maitra, P., & Ray, R. (2006). Household expenditure patterns and resource pooling: Evidence of changes in post-apartheid South Africa. Review of Economics of the Household, 4(4), 325–347. doi:10.1007/s11150-006-0011-6.
McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1990). Nash-bargained household decisions. International Economic Review, 31(1), 237. doi:10.2307/2526642.
Menon, N., van der Meulen Rodgers, Y., & Nguyen, H. (2014). Women’s land rights and children’s human capital in Vietnam. World Development, 54, 18–31. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.005.
Park, R. E. (1966). Estimation with heteroscedastic error terms. Econometrica, 34, 888. doi:10.2307/1910108.
Quisumbing, A. R., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 283–327. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00052.
Schady, N., & Rosero, J. (2008). Are cash transfers made to women spent like other sources of income? Economics Letters, 101(3), 246–248. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2008.08.015.
Schultz, T. P. (1990). Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility. Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 599–634. doi:10.2307/145669.
Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 635–664. doi:10.2307/145670.
Thomas, D. (1994). Like father, like son: Like mother, like daughter. Journal of Human Resources, 29(4), 950–988. doi:10.2307/146131.
UNICEF. (2010). Pakistan statistics. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/pakistan_pakistan_statistics.html. Accessed 22 Dec 2014.
World Bank. (2009). International development association program document for a proposed social safety net development policy credit to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
World Bank. (2014). Labor supply and vulnerability in Pakistan. Washington, DC: World Bank Report.
Yusof, S. A., & Duasa, J. (2010). Household decision-making and expenditure patterns of married men and women in Malaysia. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(3), 371–381. doi:10.1007/s10834-010-9200-9.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the invaluable comments provided by Dominique Van De Walle and Carolina Sanchez on the earlier version. This paper also greatly benefited from discussions with Mansoora Rashid, Songqing Jing, Andrea Vermehren, Iftikhar Malik, Cem Mete, Dhushyanth Raju, participants of the South Asia Human Development Knowledge Exchange Group Seminar, the Gender Action Plan Conference and all Pakistan Social Protection team members. I thank Ning Ma for her excellent assistance in preparing the data, Jing Zhang for helping with tables and invaluable comments received from two anonymous reviewers and the editor Professor Elizabeth Dolan. As usual, the findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. This work was supported by the Gender Action Plan Trust Fund and the Trust Fund for environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development (TFESSD) through the World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hou, X. How Does Women’s Decision-Making Power Affect Budget Share, Nutrition and Education in Pakistan?. J Fam Econ Iss 37, 115–131 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-015-9439-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-015-9439-2
Keywords
- Household bargaining
- Women’s decision making power
- Human development
- Education
- Nutrition
- Islamic culture
- Pakistan