Abstract
This paper is a reflection upon my previous research on an educational reform initiative in Vietnam that was borrowed from Colombia’s renowned Escuela Nueva model. In addition to being situated within the global phenomenon of policy lending/borrowing, or policy transfer, this case also reflects the prevalence of policy borrowing in Vietnam’s contemporary educational policy-making. Through a reflection of Vietnam Escuela Nueva and various cosmopolitan traces within Vietnamese education policy-making, I will highlight the constant thread of Western modernity as an anchoring reference in the pursuit of educational change. In this particular context of Vietnam as a supposedly postcolonial developing country, learning from abroad is always a process intertwined with questions of coloniality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For citations of Vietnamese in this paper, I use the author’s full name in the convention of last name-middle name-first name, unless the author has indicated a preference for the Western convention (last name, first initial).
Comment posted in the online discussion comment of “Bo Giao duc Chinh thuc Giai dap Thac mac Ve Du an Mo hinh Truong hoc Moi (VNEN) [MOET Officially Responds to Questions about the New School Model (VNEN)]”, published on Giao Duc Viet Nam [Vietnamese Education] newspaper, December 10, 2015. Retrieved from http://giaoduc.net.vn/Giao-duc-24h/Bo-Giao-duc-chinh-thuc-giai-dap-thac-mac-ve-du-an-mo-hinh-truong-hoc-moi-VNEN-post164022.gd.
Some critics have suggested that Vietnam’s high performance on the PISA is due to its low secondary enrollment rate, third lowest in all the countries participating in PISA 2015. In other words, the students who remain in school by the time they take the PISA test (age 15) tend to be from a higher socioeconomic status (Steiner-Khamsi 2019).
References
An, D. T. (2015). Mo hinh Truong hoc moi Viet Nam: Nhin tu goc do thuc tien va li luan [Vietnam Escuela Nueva model: From practical and theoretical perspectives]. Hanoi: Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (Ed.). (2003). A world culture of schooling? Local meanings, global schooling (pp. 1–26). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Andreotti, V. D. O., Stein, S., Ahenakew, C., & Hunt, D. (2015). Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 4(1), 21–40.
Arnove, R. F. (2013). Introduction: Reframing comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (4th ed., pp. 1–26). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2016). PISA, policy and persuasion: Translating complex conditions into education ‘best practice’. Comparative Education, 52(2), 202–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1143278.
Bayly, S. (2004). Vietnamese intellectuals in revolutionary and postcolonial times. Critique of Anthropology, 24(3), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X04045424.
Carney, S. (2009). Negotiating policy in an age of globalization: Exploring educational “policyscapes” in Denmark, Nepal, and China. Comparative Education Review, 53(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/593152.
Carney, S., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2012). Between faith and science: World culture theory and comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 56(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1086/665708.
Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: Demonstrating a “common world educational culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda”? Educational Theory, 50(4), 427–448.
Dang, H. A., & Glewwe, P. W. (2018). Well begun, but aiming higher: A review of Vietnam’s education trends in the past 20 years and emerging challenges. Journal of Development Studies, 54(7), 1171–1195.
Glewwe, P., Dang, H. A., Lee, J., & Vu, K. (2017). What explains Vietnam’s exceptional performance in education relative to other countries? Analysis of the 2012 and 2015 PISA data. Retrieved January 27, 2020, from https://www.riseprogramme.org/sites/www.riseprogramme.org/files/inline-files/Glewwe%20PISA_VN3x.pdf.
Großheim, M. (2018). Đổi mới in the Classroom? The portrayal of national and world history in Vietnamese textbooks. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 33(1), 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1355/sj33-1e.
Gulson, K. N., Lewis, S., Lingard, B., Lubienski, C., Takayama, K., & Webb, P. T. (2017). Policy mobilities and methodology: A proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1288150.
Iyer, P., & Moore, R. (2017). Measuring learning quality in Ethiopia, India and Vietnam: From primary to secondary school effectiveness. Compare: AJournal of Comparative and International. Education, 47(6), 908–924.
Kamibeppu, T. (2009). Education reform context and process in Vietnam. In Y. Hirosato & Y. Kitamura (Eds.), The political economy of educational reforms in Southeast Asia (pp. 169–189). Netherlands: Springer.
Kaplan, S. (2006). The pedagogical state: Education and the politics of national culture in post-1980 Turkey. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Kelly, G. P. (1998). French colonial education: Essays on Vietnam and West Africa. New York: AMS Press.
Klees, S. J., Samoff, J., & Stromquist, N. P. (2012). The World Bank and education: Critiques and alternatives. New York: Springer.
Le, H. M. (2018a). Another textbook project? The implementation of Escuela Nueva in Vietnam. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 17(3), 223–239.
Le, H. M. (2018b). The reproduction of ‘best practice’: Following Escuela Nueva to the Philippines and Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 9–16.
Lewis, S., & Hogan, A. (2019). Reform first and ask questions later? The implications of (fast) schooling policy and ‘silver bullet’ solutions. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1219961.
Lewis, D., & Mosse, D. (2006). Development brokers and translators: The ethnography of aid and agencies. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.
Luschei, T. F. (2004). Timing is everything: The intersection of borrowing and lending in Brazil’s adoption of Escuela Nueva. In Gita Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 154–168). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lynch, J. (1998). The international transfer of dysfunctional paradigms. In D. Johnson, B. Smith, & M. Crossley (Eds.), Learning and teaching in an international context: Research, theory and practice (pp. 7–33). Bristol: University of Bristol, Centre for International Studies in Education.
Meyer, O. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/231174.
Mignolo, W. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham: Duke University Press.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast policy: Experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232.
Quyen, D. (2015). Our education system is suffering from indigestion after too many experiments with new pedagogies [Giao duc dang boi thuc voi nhieu phuong phap day hoc moi]. Vietnamese Education [Giao Duc Viet Nam]. Retrieved January 27, 2020, from http://giaoduc.net.vn/Giao-duc-24h/Giao-duc-dang-boi-thuc-voi-thu-nghiem-nhieu-phuong-phap-day-hoc-moi-post164147.gd.
Ramirez, F. O. (2012). The world society perspective: Concepts, assumptions, and strategies. Comparative Education, 48(4), 423–439.
Robertson, S. L. (2012). Placing teachers in global governance agendas. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 584–607.
Samoff, J. (2013). Institutionalizing international influence. In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (4th ed., pp. 55–88). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking East: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global education policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2011). Decolonizing the evidence-based education and policy movement: revealing the colonial vestiges in educational policy, research, and neoliberal reform. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.508176.
Silova, I., Millei, Z., & Piattoeva, N. (2017). Interrupting the coloniality of knowledge production in comparative education: Postsocialist and postcolonial dialogues after the cold war. Comparative Education Review, 61(S1), S74–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/690458.
Silova, I., & Rappleye, J. (2015). Beyond the world culture debate in comparative education: Critiques, alternatives and a noisy conversation. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 13(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2014.967482.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2009). Conclusion: A way out from the dependency trap in educational development? In L. Chisholm & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), South–South cooperation in education and development (pp. 241–258). New York: Teachers College Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending: Building comparative policy studies. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 3–18). New York: Routledge.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2013). What is wrong with the “what-went-right” approach in educational policy? European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.20.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2019). What policy-makers do with PISA? In F. Waldow & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Understanding PISA’s attractiveness: Critical analyses in comparative policy studies. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Tabulawa, R. (2003). International aid agencies, learner-centred pedagogy and political democratisation: A critique. Comparative Education, 39(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060302559.
Takayama, K. (2010). Politics of externalization in reflexive times: Reinventing Japanese education reform discourses through “Finnish PISA Success”. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/644838.
Takayama, K., Sriprakash, A., & Connell, R. (2017). Toward a postcolonial comparative and international ducation. Comparative Education Review, 61(S1), S1–S24.
Tarlau, R. (2017). State theory, grassroots agency, and global policy transfer: The life and death of Colombia’s Escuela Nueva in Brazil (1997–2012). Comparative Education Review, 61(4), 675–700. https://doi.org/10.1086/693923.
Thao, P. (2015). Hau het du an ODA giao duc co… van de! [Almost all ODA educational projects have… issues!]. Giao Duc Viet Nam [Vietnamese Education]. January 27, 2020, Retrieved from http://giaoduc.net.vn/Giao-duc-24h/Hau-het-du-an-ODA-giao-duc-covan-de-post162103.gd.
Tibbetts, P. K. (2007). Resistance and change: A century of education reform in Vietnam. PhD thesis, George Washington University.
Tikly, L. (2015). What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? Towards a critical realist understanding of learning in international and comparative education. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.008.
Tikly, L. (2017). The future of Education for All as a global regime of educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 61(1), 22–57.
Tran, L. T., Marginson, S., & Nguyen, N. T. (2014). Internationalization. Higher education in Vietnam: Flexibility, mobility and practicality in the global knowledge economy (pp. 127–151). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vasavakul, T. (2000). Managing the young arnarchists: Kindergartens and national culture in postcolonial Vietnam. In R. Wollons (Ed.), Kindergartens and cultures: The global diffusion of an idea (pp. 214–250). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Verger, A. (2014). Why do policy-makers adopt global education policies ? Toward a research framework on the varying role of ideas in education reform. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 16(2), 14–29.
Waldow, F. (2012). Standardization and legitimacy: Two central concepts in research on educational borrowing and lending. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), Policy borrowing and lending in education. New York: Routledge.
Woodside, A. (1991). The contributions to rural change of modern Vietnamese village schools. In C. F. Keyes (Ed.), Reshaping local worlds: Formal education and cultural change in rural Southeast Asia (pp. 174–199). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Funding
Funding was provided by Swarthmore College (US) (Grant No. J. Roland Pennock Fellowship).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Le, M.H. Where be the ‘magic bullet’ for educational change? Vietnam and the quest of policy borrowing from abroad. J Educ Change 21, 455–466 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09370-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09370-7