Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Students as change partners: A proposal for educational change in the age of globalization

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay builds on the concept of students as partners in change proposed in The Fourth Way: The Inspiring Future for Educational Change by Andy Hargreaves and Dennis Shirley (2009) and points out why the current movement toward curriculum standardization and homogenization is counterproductive in preparing students to become competent citizens for the globalized world. Instead, the author suggests that education systems and schools should focus on students as the driving force of educational change. To do so, we need to view students as global entrepreneurs in the sense that they need to become owners of their own learning and develop a globally-oriented entrepreneurial spirit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. J. (2009). Towards a new primary curriculum: A report from the Cambridge Primary Review. Part 2: The future. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education. Retrieved from http://www.primaryreview.org.uk/Downloads/Curriculum_report/CPR_Curric_rep_Pt2_Future.pdf.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized: A bio-ecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on State Standards in Education. (2008). Common standards for K-12 education? Considering the evidence. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Chief State School Officers, & National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010a). Common core state standards initiative: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/frequently-asked-questions.

  • Council of Chief State School Officers, & National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010b, June). Introduction to the common core state standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/ccssi-introduction.pdf.

  • Fox, J. (2008). Your child’s strengths: Discover them, develop them, use them. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Yuan, K. (2008). Standards-based reform in the United States: History, research, and future directions. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2009). The fourth way of change: Towards an age of inspiration and sustainability. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Change wars (pp. 11–43). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

  • Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, G. (2001). What can we learn from international comparisons? In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in secondary schools: A reader (pp. 259–272). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (2001). The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • McGaw, B. (2010). An historic moment: The first Australian curriculum endorsed. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/default.asp.

  • McMurrer, J. (2007). Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurrer, J. (2008). Instructional time in elementary schools: A closer look at changes for specific subjects. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAEP results produce more evidence of NCLB’s failure. (2009, April). FairTest. Retrieved from http://www.fairtest.org/naep-results-produce-more-evidence-nclbs-failure.

  • National Governors Association, Council of Chief State School Officers, & Achieve, Inc. (2008). Benchmarking for success: Ensuring US students receive a world-class education. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework.pdf.

  • Pink, D. H. (2005). A whole new mind: Moving from the information age to the conceptual age. New York: Riberhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2003). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • PISA. (2003). First results from PISA 2003. Paris: PISA, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • PISA. (2007). PISA 2006: Advance details. Paris: PISA, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampey, B. D., Dion, G. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2009, April). The nation’s report card: Trends in academic progress in reading and mathematics 2008. Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics website: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2008/2009479.asp.

  • Rentner, D. S., Scott, C., Kober, N., Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V., Joftus, S., et al. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., & Cogan, L. S. (2009). The myth of equal content. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (2008). Globalization of education: An introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tienken, C. H., & Canton, D. (2009). National curriculum standards: Let’s think it over. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 6(3), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tienken, C. H., & Zhao, Y. (2010). Common core national curriculum standards: More questions.and answers. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 6(4), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (2002). No child left behind: A desktop reference. Washington, DC: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/nclbreference/reference.pdf.

  • US Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top Fund. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html.

  • Zhao, Y. (2009a). Catching up or leading the way: American education in the age of globalization. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2009b). Comments on the common core standards initiative. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice, 6(3), 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA

    Yong Zhao

Authors
  1. Yong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Y. Students as change partners: A proposal for educational change in the age of globalization. J Educ Change 12, 267–279 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9159-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9159-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation