Abstract
This paper discusses school development as collaboration between local schools and universities based on complementary needs. I examine a 10 year case study of a long-term relationship between an elementary school and a university in a town in Sweden. The relationship is jointly constructed and mediated by local, national, and international projects. Such jointly constructed and shared projects represent innovations of both the school’s and the university’s pedagogical practices. The significant actors in the collaborative relationship have been teachers, undergraduate and graduate students, school pupils, and researchers. The collaboration, which still exists, started in 1996 and has experienced stages of varying intensity and scope conceived metaphorically as a thin string. Analysis of the case and collaborative process suggests an answer to the question: Why does this collaboration exist and what makes it sustainable? This case suggests that the collaborative projects provide solutions to problems intrinsic to the respective educational institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, R. (2005). Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Bruner, J. (1985). Narrative and paradigmatic modes of thought. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing: Eighty-fourth year-book of national society for the study of education (pp. 97–115). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cole, M., & Distributed Literacy Consortium. (2006). The 5thD: An after-school program built on diversity. New York: Russell Sage.
Edwards, A. (2000). Looking at action research through the lenses of sociocultural psychology and activity theory. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 195–204. doi:10.1080/09650790000200104.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H., & Kajamaa, A. (2007). Beyond discontinuity: Expansive organizational learning remembered. Management Learning, 38(3), 1–18.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jensen, T., Jensen, K., & Jack, M. (2005). Learning in virtual and physical communities. In M. Nilsson & H. Nocon (Eds.), Teaching and technology in local and global communities (pp. 87–130). Oxford: Peter Lang.
Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(7/8), 345–351. doi:10.1108/13665620310504837.
Konkola, R., Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Lambert, P., & Ludvigsen, S. (2007). Promoting learning and transfer between school and workplace. Journal of Education and Work, 3(20), 211–228. doi:10.1080/13639080701464483.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.
Lambert, J. (2002). Digital storytelling. Berkeley: Digital Diner Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (2002). Becoming the village: Education across lives. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 34–45). Oxford: Blackwell.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Nilsson, M. (2003). Transformation through integration: An activity theoretical analysis of school development as integration of childcare institutions and the compulsory school. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Helsinki.
Papert, S. (1994). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
Sarason, S. (2002). Educational reform: A self-scrutinizing memoir. New York: Teachers College Press.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: Century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zeller, N. (1995). Narrative rationality in educational research. In H. Mc Ewan & K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in teaching, learning, and research. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nilsson, M.E. University–school collaboration based on complementary needs. J Educ Change 9, 349–356 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9082-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9082-x