Skip to main content
Log in

Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Mandarin functional morpheme dou appears to have been interpreted, among other things, as a distributor, focus marker even, or already. This paper aims at providing a unified semantic account for these different uses. I argue that the semantic core of these different usages is the same: dou is simply a maximality operator. It gives rise to different meanings by applying maximality to a contextually determined plural set. This could be a set of covers, a set of focus-induced alternatives, or a set of degrees ordered on a scale. This analysis also connects dou in these contexts with dou in environments that license polarity items, as discussed in Giannakidou and Cheng (J Semant 23: 135–183, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brisson, Christine. 1998. Distributivity, maximality, and floating quantifiers. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.

  • Cheng Lisa Lai-Shen. (1995). On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 197–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou Anastasia, Cheng Lisa Lai-Shen. (2006). Definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 23: 135–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon Brendan. (1987). The readings of plural noun phrases in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham James. (1981). Reciprocal interpretation. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 97–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Larry. 1969. A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In Proceedings of the 5th Chicago Linguistics Society, 98–107. Chicago University.

  • Huang, Shi-Zhe. 1996. Quantification and predication in Mandarin Chinese: A case study of Dou. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Karttunen, Lauri, and Peters, Stanley. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Syntax and semantics 11: Presuppositions, ed. C. Oh and D. Dineen, 1–56. Academic Press, New York.

  • Lee, Thomas. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Lin Jo-Wang. (1998). Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics 6: 201–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Feng-his. 1990. Scope dependency in English and Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Paris Marie-Claude. (1998). Focus operators and types of predication in Mandarin. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 27: 139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portner Paul. (2002). Topicality and (non)specificity in Mandarin. Journal of Semantics 19: 275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Schwarzschild Roger. (1996). Pluralities. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyu Shu-Ing. (2004). (A)symmetries between Mandarin Chinese lian...dou and shenzhi. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 32: 81–128

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow Arnim. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Jianxin. 1999. Syntax and semantics of quantification in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Xiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiang, M. Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou . J East Asian Linguist 17, 227–245 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9025-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9025-9

Keywords

Navigation