Abstract
We discuss ellipsis of the possessee in both pronominal possessor constructions (Dutch: zijn boek ‘his book’) and possessor doubling constructions (Dutch: John z’n boek, John his book ‘John’s book’) from a micro-comparative perspective. More specifically we show, on the basis of an in-depth study of the nominal system of 57 Dutch dialects, that there are two types of possessee ellipsis. In the first type there is a pro which needs to be licensed by gender agreement. In the second type there is an overt pro-form, similar to English one, and hence no ellipsis. Dialects that have the first type of possessee ellipsis can be further divided into two subtypes. The first has gender agreement on the possessive pronoun, the second one does not. Interestingly, possessee ellipsis can take place in the possessor doubling construction only in the former subtype of dialect. We implement this striking generalization by arguing that in the latter type of dialect pro has to move to Spec,DP in order to be licensed. The doubling possessor also has to be merged in Spec,DP. As a consequence, pro and a doubling possessor cannot co-occur and hence possessee ellipsis and possessor doubling are incompatible. In the former type of dialect, i.e., those dialects that do express gender on the possessive pronoun, pro can be licensed by the gender agreement on the possessive pronoun in a position lower than Spec,DP. Hence, in these dialects Spec,DP is available for a doubling possessor and, consequently, possessee ellipsis and possessor doubling can co-occur.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abney, S. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Barbiers, S. 2005. Variation in the morphosyntax of ONE. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 159–183.
Bennis, H., N. Corver, and M. den Dikken. 1998. Predication in nominal phrases. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 85–117.
Bobaljik, J., and S. Wurmbrand. 2005. The domain of agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 809–865.
Carstens, V. 2000. Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319–355.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT.
Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT.
Corver, N. 1990. The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions. Doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University.
Corver, N. 2003. A note on micro-dimensions of possession in Dutch and related languages. In Germania et alia. A Linguistic Webschrift for Hans den Besten, eds. J. Koster & H. van Riemsdijk (http://odur.let.rug.nl/~koster/DenBesten/contents).
Corver, N. 2008. Uniformity and diversity in the syntax of evaluative vocatives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11: 43–93.
Corver, N., and M. van Oostendorp. 2005. Low Saxon possessive pronominals. Syntax and phonology. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2005, 73–86, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Corver, N., M. van Koppen, H. Kranendonk, and M. Rigterink. 2007. The noun phrase: Diversity in Dutch DP design. Nordlyd 34(1): 73–85.
Déchaine, R.-M., and M. Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.
den Besten, H. 2007. Possessor commanding possessum. Handout of a talk at Utrecht University, UiL-OTS, 02-05-2007. Utrecht, Netherlands.
den Dikken, M. 1998. Predicate inversion in DP. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, ed. A. Alexiadou and C. Wilder, 177–214. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
den Dikken, M. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge: MIT.
Deunk, G.H. 1977. Grammatica van het Winterswijks, deel 2. Groningen: Sasland.
Duinhoven, A.M. 1988. Middelnederlandse syntaxis—synchroon en diachroon; deel 1: de naamwoordgroep. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Emonds, J. 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
Haegeman, L. 2003. The external possessor construction in West Flemish. In From NP to DP. Volume II: The expression of possession, ed. M. Coene, Y. d’Hulst, and L. Tasmowski, 221–256. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kester, E.-P. 1996. The nature of adjectival inflection. Dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Koopman, H. 2001. The locality of agreement and the structure of the DP in Masaai. Manuscript, University of California Los Angeles.
Lobeck, A. 1995. Ellipsis: functional heads, licensing and ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Longobardi, G. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665.
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2002. Pronouns, clitics and empty nouns. ‘Pronominality’ and licensing in syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Postal, P. 1966. On so-called pronouns in English. In Modern studies in English, ed. D. Reibel and S. Schane, 201–223. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Rizzi, L. 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.
Royen, G. 1948. Buigingsverschijnselen in het Nederlands. Deel II. N.V.. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche uitgevers maatschappij.
Schoorlemmer, M. 1998. Possessors, articles and definiteness. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, ed. A. Alexiadou and C. Wilder, 55–86. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sleeman, P. 1996. Licensing empty nouns in French. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Szabolcsi, A. 1994. The noun phrase. In Syntax and Semantics: The syntactic structure of Hungarian 27: 179–274.
ter Laan, K. 1953. Proeve van een Groninger spraakkunst. Winschoten: Van der Veer.
van de Craats, I., N. Corver, and R. Van Hout. 2000. Conservation of grammatical knowledge: On the acquisition of possessive noun phrases by Turkish and Moroccan learners of Dutch. Linguistics 38: 221–314.
Vergnaud, J., and M.L. Zubizarreta. 1992. The definite determiner and the inalienable construction in French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 595–652.
Wakelin, M. 1972. English dialects. An introduction. London: Athlone.
Wolfram, W., and N. Schilling-Estes. 1998. American English. Dialects and variation. Malden: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Corver, N., van Koppen, M. Ellipsis in Dutch possessive noun phrases: a micro-comparative approach. J Comp German Linguistics 13, 99–140 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-010-9034-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-010-9034-8