Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Domain-specific Parenting Practices and Adolescent Self-esteem, Problem Behaviors, and Competence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In parent socialization research, it has been suggested that the specific practices parents apply to regulate different domains or areas of adolescents’ lives be examined to add greater specificity to domain-general studies of parenting styles or patterns and to better understand the link between parenting practices and adolescent adjustment. We examined from adolescents’ perspectives the parenting practices their mothers and fathers used when regulating different issues in different areas of adolescents’ lives. We examined 18 issues (e.g., grades, platonic friendship; smoking, fighting with siblings, choice of future career), classified into the moral, conventional, personal, and prudential domains, and multifaceted issues (issues that share features of more than one domain). We also examined whether domain variations in parenting practices are related to adolescents’ social and academic competence; self-esteem; internalizing, externalizing, attention, and total problems. Adolescents between 13 to 18 years of age (N = 182; M = 16.01 years of age; SD = 1.25) were interviewed (50 to 75 min) about the parenting practices their mothers and fathers employ for different issues. Adolescents also completed questionnaires on demographics and on their social and academic competence; self-esteem; internalizing, externalizing, attention, and total problems. Adolescent adjustment associated with some parenting practices (e.g., punishment) were domain-specific (e.g., positive in moral domain but negative in prudential domain). However, certain parenting practices (e.g., verbal hostility, coercion) were related to negative adjustment and others to positive adjustment (e.g., monitoring) irrespective of domains. The present study advances theoretical propositions regarding domain-specificity and domain generality of parenting practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T., & Rescorla, L. (2001). The manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, I., Smetana, J. G., & Klimstra, T. (2014). Maternal monitoring, adolescent disclosure, and adolescent adjustment among Palestinian refugee youth in Jordan. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arim, R. G., Marshall, S. K., & Shapka, J. D. (2010). A domain-specific approach to adolescent reporting of parental control. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296–3319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01915.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (2012). Differentiating between confrontive and coercive kinds of power-assertive disciplinary practices. Human Development, 55, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D., Larzelere, R. E., & Owens, E. (2010). Effects of preschool parents’ power-assertive patterns and practices on adolescent development. Parenting: Science and practice, 10, 157–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295190903290790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Hahn, C. S., & Haynes, O. M. (2008). Maternal responsiveness to young children at three ages: Longitudinal analysis of a multidimensional, modular, and specific parenting construct. Developmental Psychology, 44, 867–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Criag, L., & Mullan, K. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review, 76, 834–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411427673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J., Day, R. D., Lamb, M. E., & Cabrera, N. J. (2014). Should researchers conceptualize differently the dimensions of parenting for mothers and fathers? Journal of Family Theory and Review, 6, 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development, 81, 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01426.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, W. E., Kim, E. S., Kim, J. H. J., Nguyen, T. U., Wendt, D. C., Nagata, D. K., & Gone, J. P. (2013). In search of cultural diversity, revisited: Recent publication trends in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasebe, Y., Nucci, L., & Nucci, M. S. (2004). Parental control of the personal domain and adolescent symptoms of psychopathology: A cross-national study in the United States and Japan. Child Development, 75, 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00708.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helwig, C. C., To, S., Wang, Q., Liu, C., & Yang, S. (2014). Judgments and reasoning about parental discipline involving induction and psychological control in China and Canada. Child Development, 85(3), 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1994). Discipline and internalization. Developmental Psychology, 30, 26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and psychological adjustment: A meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intracultural studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00054.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2013). Handbook of moral development. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lafleur, L., Zhao, Y., & Zeringue, M. M. (2016). Warmth and legitimacy beliefs contextualize adolescents’ negative reactions to parental monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 51, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandara, J. (2003). The typological approach in child and family psychology: A review of theory, methods, and research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023734627624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal conceptions. Child Development, 52, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L., Hasebe, Y., & Lins-Dyer, M. (2005). Adolescent psychological well-being and parental control of the personal. In J. G. Smetana (Ed.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Changing boundaries of parental authority during adolescence (pp. 17–30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2008). Domain-appropriateness of maternal discipline as a predictor of adolescents’ positive and negative outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00426.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Carlo, G. (2006). Adolescent perceptions of appropriate parental reactions in moral and conventional social domains. Social Development, 15, 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00352.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palkovitz, R., Sherif Trask, B., & Adamsons, K. (2014). Essential differences in meaning and processes of mothering and fathering: Family systems, feminist, and qualitative perspectives. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 6, 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., & Fisher, P. A. (2002). Recent developments in our understanding of parenting: Bidirectional effects, casual models, and the search for parsimony. In M. Bornstein ed, Handbook of parenting Vol. 5, Practical issues in parenting. 2nd ed. (pp. 59–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Series Ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalb, D. W., Schwalb, B. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2013). Fathers in cultural context. New York: NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (1983). Social-cognitive development: Domain distinctions and coordinations. Developmental Review, 3, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(83)90027-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (1988). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority. Child Development, 59, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescents, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (2015). Goal pursuit in the context of adolescent-parent relationships. In G. Oettingen & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Self-regulation in adolescence (pp. 243–265). New York, NY: Cambridge University.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G., & Daddis, C. (2002). Domain-specific antecedents of psychological control and parental monitoring: The role of parenting beliefs and practices. Child Development, 73, 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-624.00424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Daddis, C. (2004). Longitudinal development of family decision-making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle class African American adolescents. Child Development, 75(5), 1418–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00749.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G., Crean, H., & Campione-Barr, N. (2005). Adolescents’ and parents’ changing conceptions of parental authority. In J. Smetana (Ed.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Changing boundaries of parental authority during adolescence (pp. 31–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G., Robinson, J., & Rote, W. M. (2015). Socialization in adolescence. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 60–84). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkhabi, N., & Middaugh, E. (2014). How variations in parents’ use of confrontive and coercive control relate to variations in parent-adolescent conflicts, adolescent disclosure, and parental knowledge: Adolescents’ perspective. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 1227–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9783-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S. M., & Bond, M. H. (2002). A critical look at parenting research from the mainstream: Problems uncovered while adapting Western research to non-Western cultures. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002320620389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. M., Telzer, E. H., Gonzales, N. A., & Fuligni, A. J. (2015). Parental cultural socialization of Mexican-American adolescents’ family obligation values and behaviors. Child Development, 86, 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (2010). Domain specificity in social interactions, social thought, and social development. Child Development, 81, 720–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390933.ch30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (2015). Moral development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol.1 (pp. 484–522). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waizenhofer, R. N., Jackson-Newsom, J., & Buchanan, C. M. (2004). Mothers’ and fathers’ knowledge of adolescents’ daily activities: Its sources and its links with adolescent adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. T., & Kenny, S. (2014). Longitudinal links between fathers’ and mothers’ harsh verbal discipline and adolescents’ conduct problems and depressive symptoms. Child Development, 85, 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by an intramural SJSU University research grant to the first author.

Author Contributions

N.S. designed, executed, and wrote the paper. E.M. analyzed data and wrote results section.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Sorkhabi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board at San Jose State University that approved the present study and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Both authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all parents, and informed assent was obtained from all adolescent participants in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sorkhabi, N., Middaugh, E. Domain-specific Parenting Practices and Adolescent Self-esteem, Problem Behaviors, and Competence. J Child Fam Stud 28, 505–518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1270-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1270-6

Keywords

Navigation