Abstract
In parent socialization research, it has been suggested that the specific practices parents apply to regulate different domains or areas of adolescents’ lives be examined to add greater specificity to domain-general studies of parenting styles or patterns and to better understand the link between parenting practices and adolescent adjustment. We examined from adolescents’ perspectives the parenting practices their mothers and fathers used when regulating different issues in different areas of adolescents’ lives. We examined 18 issues (e.g., grades, platonic friendship; smoking, fighting with siblings, choice of future career), classified into the moral, conventional, personal, and prudential domains, and multifaceted issues (issues that share features of more than one domain). We also examined whether domain variations in parenting practices are related to adolescents’ social and academic competence; self-esteem; internalizing, externalizing, attention, and total problems. Adolescents between 13 to 18 years of age (N = 182; M = 16.01 years of age; SD = 1.25) were interviewed (50 to 75 min) about the parenting practices their mothers and fathers employ for different issues. Adolescents also completed questionnaires on demographics and on their social and academic competence; self-esteem; internalizing, externalizing, attention, and total problems. Adolescent adjustment associated with some parenting practices (e.g., punishment) were domain-specific (e.g., positive in moral domain but negative in prudential domain). However, certain parenting practices (e.g., verbal hostility, coercion) were related to negative adjustment and others to positive adjustment (e.g., monitoring) irrespective of domains. The present study advances theoretical propositions regarding domain-specificity and domain generality of parenting practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achenbach, T., & Rescorla, L. (2001). The manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
Ahmad, I., Smetana, J. G., & Klimstra, T. (2014). Maternal monitoring, adolescent disclosure, and adolescent adjustment among Palestinian refugee youth in Jordan. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12133.
Arim, R. G., Marshall, S. K., & Shapka, J. D. (2010). A domain-specific approach to adolescent reporting of parental control. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.001.
Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296–3319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01915.x.
Baumrind, D. (2012). Differentiating between confrontive and coercive kinds of power-assertive disciplinary practices. Human Development, 55, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337962.
Baumrind, D., Larzelere, R. E., & Owens, E. (2010). Effects of preschool parents’ power-assertive patterns and practices on adolescent development. Parenting: Science and practice, 10, 157–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295190903290790.
Bornstein, M. H., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Hahn, C. S., & Haynes, O. M. (2008). Maternal responsiveness to young children at three ages: Longitudinal analysis of a multidimensional, modular, and specific parenting construct. Developmental Psychology, 44, 867–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.867.
Criag, L., & Mullan, K. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review, 76, 834–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411427673.
Fagan, J., Day, R. D., Lamb, M. E., & Cabrera, N. J. (2014). Should researchers conceptualize differently the dimensions of parenting for mothers and fathers? Journal of Family Theory and Review, 6, 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12044.
Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2010). Integrating different perspectives on socialization theory and research: A domain-specific approach. Child Development, 81, 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01426.x.
Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19.
Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the self-perception profile for adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
Hartmann, W. E., Kim, E. S., Kim, J. H. J., Nguyen, T. U., Wendt, D. C., Nagata, D. K., & Gone, J. P. (2013). In search of cultural diversity, revisited: Recent publication trends in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032260.
Hasebe, Y., Nucci, L., & Nucci, M. S. (2004). Parental control of the personal domain and adolescent symptoms of psychopathology: A cross-national study in the United States and Japan. Child Development, 75, 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00708.x.
Helwig, C. C., To, S., Wang, Q., Liu, C., & Yang, S. (2014). Judgments and reasoning about parental discipline involving induction and psychological control in China and Canada. Child Development, 85(3), 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12183.
Hoffman, M. L. (1994). Discipline and internalization. Developmental Psychology, 30, 26–28.
Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and psychological adjustment: A meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intracultural studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00054.x.
Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2013). Handbook of moral development. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Lafleur, L., Zhao, Y., & Zeringue, M. M. (2016). Warmth and legitimacy beliefs contextualize adolescents’ negative reactions to parental monitoring. Journal of Adolescence, 51, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.
Mandara, J. (2003). The typological approach in child and family psychology: A review of theory, methods, and research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023734627624.
Nucci, L. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal conceptions. Child Development, 52, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129220.
Nucci, L. (2001). Education in the moral domain. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605987.
Nucci, L., Hasebe, Y., & Lins-Dyer, M. (2005). Adolescent psychological well-being and parental control of the personal. In J. G. Smetana (Ed.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Changing boundaries of parental authority during adolescence (pp. 17–30). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.125.
Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2008). Domain-appropriateness of maternal discipline as a predictor of adolescents’ positive and negative outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(3), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00426.x.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Carlo, G. (2006). Adolescent perceptions of appropriate parental reactions in moral and conventional social domains. Social Development, 15, 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00352.x.
Palkovitz, R., Sherif Trask, B., & Adamsons, K. (2014). Essential differences in meaning and processes of mothering and fathering: Family systems, feminist, and qualitative perspectives. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 6, 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12048.
Patterson, G. R., & Fisher, P. A. (2002). Recent developments in our understanding of parenting: Bidirectional effects, casual models, and the search for parsimony. In M. Bornstein ed, Handbook of parenting Vol. 5, Practical issues in parenting. 2nd ed. (pp. 59–88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Series Ed.).
Schwalb, D. W., Schwalb, B. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2013). Fathers in cultural context. New York: NY: Routledge.
Smetana, J. G. (1983). Social-cognitive development: Domain distinctions and coordinations. Developmental Review, 3, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(83)90027-8.
Smetana, J. G. (1988). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority. Child Development, 59, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130313.
Smetana, J. G. (2011). Adolescents, families, and social development: How teens construct their worlds. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Smetana, J. G. (2015). Goal pursuit in the context of adolescent-parent relationships. In G. Oettingen & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Self-regulation in adolescence (pp. 243–265). New York, NY: Cambridge University.
Smetana, J. G., & Daddis, C. (2002). Domain-specific antecedents of psychological control and parental monitoring: The role of parenting beliefs and practices. Child Development, 73, 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-624.00424.
Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Daddis, C. (2004). Longitudinal development of family decision-making: Defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle class African American adolescents. Child Development, 75(5), 1418–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00749.x.
Smetana, J. G., Crean, H., & Campione-Barr, N. (2005). Adolescents’ and parents’ changing conceptions of parental authority. In J. Smetana (Ed.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Changing boundaries of parental authority during adolescence (pp. 31–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.126.
Smetana, J. G., Robinson, J., & Rote, W. M. (2015). Socialization in adolescence. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 60–84). New York, NY: Guilford.
Sorkhabi, N., & Middaugh, E. (2014). How variations in parents’ use of confrontive and coercive control relate to variations in parent-adolescent conflicts, adolescent disclosure, and parental knowledge: Adolescents’ perspective. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 1227–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9783-5.
Stewart, S. M., & Bond, M. H. (2002). A critical look at parenting research from the mainstream: Problems uncovered while adapting Western research to non-Western cultures. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002320620389.
Tsai, K. M., Telzer, E. H., Gonzales, N. A., & Fuligni, A. J. (2015). Parental cultural socialization of Mexican-American adolescents’ family obligation values and behaviors. Child Development, 86, 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12358.
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12358.
Turiel, E. (2010). Domain specificity in social interactions, social thought, and social development. Child Development, 81, 720–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444390933.ch30.
Turiel, E. (2015). Moral development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol.1 (pp. 484–522). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy113.
Waizenhofer, R. N., Jackson-Newsom, J., & Buchanan, C. M. (2004). Mothers’ and fathers’ knowledge of adolescents’ daily activities: Its sources and its links with adolescent adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.348.
Wang, M. T., & Kenny, S. (2014). Longitudinal links between fathers’ and mothers’ harsh verbal discipline and adolescents’ conduct problems and depressive symptoms. Child Development, 85, 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12143.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by an intramural SJSU University research grant to the first author.
Author Contributions
N.S. designed, executed, and wrote the paper. E.M. analyzed data and wrote results section.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board at San Jose State University that approved the present study and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Both authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all parents, and informed assent was obtained from all adolescent participants in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sorkhabi, N., Middaugh, E. Domain-specific Parenting Practices and Adolescent Self-esteem, Problem Behaviors, and Competence. J Child Fam Stud 28, 505–518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1270-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1270-6