Skip to main content
Log in

Risk, Protection, and Adjustment among Youth with Incarcerated and Non-Resident Parents: A Mixed-Methods Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Author Correction to this article was published on 26 December 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Parental incarceration has been increasingly recognized as a significant threat to the development and well-being of millions of American children and youth. After decades of documenting problems among youth with incarcerated parents, researchers have now started to emphasize the critical need for research on heterogeneity and competence in this population. Towards this end, we used a mixed-methods approach to identify different subgroups of youth with incarcerated and non-resident parents (n = 26) and to explore potential patterns of individual and family factors across groups. Cluster analysis suggested four different subgroups of youth that varied in the extent to which they exhibited behavior problems and competence. The majority of youth were classified as “adjusted” or “striving”, with comparatively few categorized as either “thriving” or “vulnerable”. Thematic analysis of qualitative data suggested that groups varied in terms of the extent to which they experienced economic and residential instability and challenges related to their social location, as well as caregiver positive expressiveness, agency, and social support. Results further indicated that although parental incarceration may be a part of an overall profile of risk, it does not appear to consistently distinguish youth separated from parents for different reasons in terms of patterns of adjustment and competence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 26 December 2018

    The original version of this manuscript contained an error in the reference for our general life events measure. General life events were assessed using the Life Events and Circumstances Checklist (LEC; Work, Cowen, Parker & Wyman, 1990) rather than the Coddington Life Events Scale (CLES; Coddington, 1972). A corrected description of the measure is provided below.

References

  • Aaron, L., & Dallaire, D. (2010). Parental incarceration and multiple risk experiences: Effects on family processes and children’s delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 1471–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms and Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, E. K., & Robbins, D. E. (2013). A latent class analysis of resilient development among early adolescents living in public housing. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J. A. (2015). Family process perspective on the heterogeneous effects of maternal incarceration on child wellbeing: The trouble with differences. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J. A. (2016). A family stress-proximal process model for understanding the effects of parental incarceration on children and their families. Couple and Family Psychology: Research & Practice, 5, 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arditti, J., Burton, L., & Neeves-Botelho, S. (2010). Maternal distress and parenting in the context of cumulative disadvantage. Family Process, 49, 142–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. O., & Jones, W. H. (1995). The Parental Stress Scale: Initial psychometric evidence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besemer, S., & Murray, J. (2016). Incarceration and development of delinquency. In T. P. Beauchaine & S. P. Hinshaw (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Externalizing Spectrum Disorders (pp. 323–346). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (2002). Family stress management: A contextual approach. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5. http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/backissues/5_3/pdf/bowen.pdf.

  • Brand, A., & Johnson, J. (1982). Note on the reliability of the Life Events Checklist. Psychological Reports, 50, 1274–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, R. M. (2011). Understanding the mechanism behind maternal imprisonment and adolescent school dropout. Family Relations, 60, 272–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2002). A developmental psychopathology perspective on adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coddington, R. (1972). The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 16, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coddington, R. (1999). Coddington Life Events Scales (CLES) technical manual. Toronto: Multi Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. (2005). Black women and motherhood. In S. Hardy & C. Wiedmer (Eds.), Motherhood and space. Configurations of the maternal through politics, home, and the body (pp. 149–159). NY: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., Elder, Jr., G. H., Lorenz, F. O., Simons, R. L., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1992). A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development, 63, 526–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (1994). Maternal depression and child development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 73–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallaire, D., Zeman, J., & Thrash, T. (2014). Children’s experiences of maternal incarceration-specific risks: Predictions to psychological maladaptation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, J., Matte-Gagné, C., Daigneault, I., Blackburn, M., Hébert, M., McDuff, P., Auclair, J., Veillette, S. & Perron, M. (2016). A prospective study of the impact of child maltreatment and friend support on psychological distress trajectory: From adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Affective Disorders, 189, 336–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., Nelson, T. J., & Paranal, R. (2001). Fatherhood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Institute for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, A., Cooper, C. E., Garfinkel, I., Schwartz-Soicher, O., & Mincy, R. B. (2012). Beyond absenteeism: Father incarceration and child development. Demography, 49, 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, M. A. (1984). The myth of the strong Black woman. In A. M. Jaggar & P. S. Rothenberg (Eds.), Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of relations between women and men (pp. 32–35). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C. (2010). Legacies of crime: A follow-up of the children of highly delinquent girls and boys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., & Copp, J. E. (2015). “Packages” of risk: Implications for determining the effect of maternal incarceration on child wellbeing. Criminology and Public Policy, 14, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. H., Rouse, M. H., Connell, A. M., Broth, M. R., Hall, C. M., & Heyward, D. (2011). Maternal depression and child psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, M. J., Sulik, M. J., & Lieberman, A. F. (2016). Traumatic life events and psychopathology in a high risk, ethnically diverse sample of young children: A person-centered approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 833–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halevi, G., Djalovski, A., Vengrober, A., & Feldman, R. (2016). Risk and resilience trajectories in war-exposed children across the first decade of life. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 1183–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, T. E., Carswell, S. B., & Rose, M. (2007). Research on caretaking of children of incarcerated parents: Findings and their service delivery implications. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 384–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, A. R. (2016). Beyond boys’ bad behavior: Paternal incarceration and cognitive development in middle adulthood. Social Forces, 95, 861–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D., Dymnicki, A. B., Mohatt, N., Allen, J., & Kelly, J. G. (2015). Clustering methods and qualitative data: A mixed-methods approach for prevention research with small samples. Prevention Science, 16, 1007–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, D. B., Tolan, P. H., & Gorman-Smith, D. (2005). Cluster analysis in family psychology research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, B. M., & Gustafson, R. (2007). The effect of maternal incarceration on adult offspring involvement in the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. I., & Easterling, B. (2012). Understanding unique effects of parental incarceration on child well-being: Challenges, progress, and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. I., & Easterling, B. (2015). Coping with confinement: Adolescents’ experiences with parental incarceration. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 244–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampfner, C. J. (1995). Post-traumatic stress reactions in children of imprisoned mothers. In K. Gabel & D. Johnston (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents (pp. 89–100). New York, NY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellstrand, J. M., & Eddy, J. M. (2011). Parental incarceration during childhood, family context, and youth problem behavior across adolescence. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., & Lerner, J. V. (2005). Positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin-Bizan, S., Doyle Lynche, A., Fay, K., Schmid, K., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Trajectories of positive and negative behaviors from early- to middle-adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 751–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, M. C., Graczyk, P. A., O’Hare, E., & Neuman, G. (2000). Maternal depression and parenting behavior: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 561–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macia, L. (2015). Using clustering as a tool: Mixed methods in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1083–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models, and research strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 101, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, A. S. (2014). Ordinary magic: Resilience in development.. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Torteya, C., Miller-Graff, L. E., Howell, K. H., & Figge, C. (2017). Profiles of adaptation among child victims of suspected maltreatment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 46, 840–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. M. (2007). Risk and resilience among African American children of incarcerated parents. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 15, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. (1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a dataset. Psychometrika, 50, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooi, E. A., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). A concise guide to market research. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, C. T., Bybee, D., Oyserman, D., Allen-Meares, P., MacFarlane, P., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2004). Diversity of outcomes among adolescent children of mothers with mental illness. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 206–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphey, D., & Cooper, P. M. (2015). Parents behind bars: What happens to their children? Washington, DC: Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. (2012). Parental involvement in the criminal justice system and the development of youth theft, marijuana use, depression, and poor academic performance. Criminology, 50, 255–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Parental imprisonment: Long-lasting effects on boys’ internalizing problems through the life course. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesmith, A., & Ruhland, E. (2008). Children of incarcerated parents: Challenges and resiliency, in their own words. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1119–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldehinkel, A. J., Ormel, J., Verhulst, F. C., & Nederhof, E. (2014). Childhood adversities and adolescent depression: A matter of both risk and resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 1067–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. M. (2002). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1, 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L., Schieman, S., Fazio, E. M., & Meersman, S. C. (2005). Stress, health, and the life course: Some conceptual perspectives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Charitable Trusts. (2010). Collateral costs: Incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.

  • Phelps, E., Zimmerman, S., Warren, A. E. A., Jeličić, H., von Eye, A., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). The structure and developmental course of Positive Youth Development (PYD) in early adolescence: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S., & Gates, T. (2011). A conceptual framework for understanding the stigmatization of children of incarcerated parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehlmann, J., Eddy, J. M., Dallaire, D. H., Zeman, J. L., Myers, B. J., & Burraston, B. (2013). Relationship processes and resilience in children with incarcerated parents. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 78, 1–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poehlmann, J., & Eddy, J. M. (2010). A research and intervention agenda for children and incarcerated parents. In J. Poehlmann & M. Eddy (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 311–341). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poehlmann-Tynan, J. & Arditti, J. A. (in press). Developmental and family perspectives on parental incarceration. In C. Wildeman, A. Haskins & J. Poehlmann-Tynan (Eds.), Minimizing collateral damage: Interdisciplinary perspectives and interventions to diminish the consequences of mass incarceration for children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A. J., & Margolin, G. (2015). Parental incarceration, transnational migration, and military deployment: Family process mechanisms of youth adjustment to temporary parent absence. Child and Family Psychology Review, 18, 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2011). The incarceration ledger: Toward a new era in assessing societal consequences. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 819–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S. F., & Marcus-Mendoza, S. T. (2001). It’s a family affair: Incarcerated women and their families. Women and Criminal Justice, 12, 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. (2011). Disrupted childhoods: Children of women in prison. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. S., Smith, V. C., & Muhammad, B. M. (2016). Mass incarceration: Perpetuating the “habits of survival” and race identities of Black women caregivers to children of incarcerated parents. Journal of Criminal Justice and Law Review, 5, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turanovic, J. J., Rodrigues, N., & Pratt, T. C. (2012). The collateral consequences of incarceration revisited: A qualitative analysis of the effects on caregivers of children of incarcerated parents. Criminology, 50, 913–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K. (2017). The unequal consequences of mass incarceration for children. Demography, 54, 361–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, K., & Wildeman, C. (2015). Detrimental for some? Heterogeneous effects of maternal incarceration on child wellbeing. Criminology & Public Policy, 14, 125–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, M., Liebenberg, L., Dudding, P., Armstrong, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Patterns of service use, individual and contextual risk factors, and resilience among adolescents using multiple psychosocial services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. (1990). Black macho and the myth of the superwoman. New York, NY: The Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H. Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, M. A. B., Marani, J. E., Appugliese, D., Woods, R., Siegel, J. A., Cabral, H. J., & Frank, D. A. (2007). Socioemotional effects of fathers’ incarceration on low-income, urban, school-aged children. Pediatrics, 120, e678–e685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman, C. (2010). Paternal incarceration and children’s physically aggressive behaviors: Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Social Forces, 89, 285–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildeman, C., Wakefield, S., & Turney, K. (2013). Misidentifying the effects of parental imprisonment? A comment on Johnson and Easterling (2012). Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 252–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods-Giscombé, C. L. (2010). Superwoman schema: African American women’s views on stress, strength, and health. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 668–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on data from a pilot study funded by the Institute of Society, Culture, and Environment (ISCE) at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech). The authors would like to thank the children and caregivers who participated in this study as well as the community-based organization that helped us recruit participants. We are also grateful to Amanda Capannola, Macy Halladay, Rachel Harr, and Lexi Jantz for their research assistance and to Amy Rauer for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Author Contributions

E. I. J.: Contributed to study design, conducted quantitative and qualitative data analyses, and wrote the paper. J. A.: designed and executed the study, contributed to the qualitative analyses, and collaborated in the writing and editing of the manuscript. C. M.: conducted qualitative analyses and edited drafts of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth I. Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Virginia Tech and the University of Tennessee.

Informed Consent

Informed consent and assent were obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, E.I., Arditti, J.A. & McGregor, C.M. Risk, Protection, and Adjustment among Youth with Incarcerated and Non-Resident Parents: A Mixed-Methods Study. J Child Fam Stud 27, 1914–1928 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1045-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1045-0

Keywords

Navigation