Skip to main content
Log in

Motivation for Solitude: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Adolescents from Collectivist and Individualist Cultures in South Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solitude during adolescence is a potentially double edged sword. Involuntary (non-self-determined solitude) is associated with loneliness, which is known to predict many forms of psychological ill-being. In contrast, freely chosen (self-determined solitude) is associated with healthy developmental outcomes. It is possible that cultural attitudes towards solitude could influence the way adolescents think about and engage in solitude. The present study examined whether South African adolescents from individualist and collectivist cultures differ in their motivations for solitude, using the Motivation for Solitude Scale (MSS-SF). Respondents included 426 adolescents from collectivist and 266 from individualist cultures, between 14 and 18 years of age (mean age = 15.7). For valid cross-cultural comparisons, measurement equivalence was established using invariance and differential item functioning analysis. Results for the measurement invariance analysis (MI) marginally failed to support scalar invariance. Given criticism that MI is overly restrictive, Rasch analysis was used to test for uniform DIF, which supported invariance. Next, Bayesian analysis was used to investigate group differences. There was no difference between the cultural groups for non-self-determined solitude, but, adolescents from individualist cultures were less likely to engage in self-determined solitude. Results support the cross-cultural application of the MSS-SF, and point to a possible cultural bias against self-determined solitude in individualist cultures, despite its potential benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, B. G., Van de Vijver, F. J., & De Bruin, G. P. (2012). Identity in South Africa: Examining self-descriptions across ethnic groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.11.008..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andraszewicz, S., Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, R., Grasman, R., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). An introduction to Bayesian hypothesis testing for management research. Journal of Management, 41, 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314560412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. R., & Sundararajan, L. (2014). Experiences of solitude. In R. J. Coplan & J. C. Bowker (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 90–108). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiswenger, K. L. (2008). Autonomy for solitary and interpersonal behavior in adolescence: Exploring links with peer relatedness, well-being, and social coping. Worchester: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiswenger, K. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (2010). Interpersonal and intrapersonal factors associated with autonomous motivation in adolescents’ after-school activities. Journal of Early Adolescence, 3, 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609333298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, E. S. (1997). The call of solitude: Alonetime in a world of attachment. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, K. T., Riedel, A. A., Hein, K., McLoyd, V., Petersen, A., & Kipke, M. (2002). Adolescent health and well-being in the twenty-first century: A global perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 69–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.00025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, S. N., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on the role of autonomy in solitary behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 645–648. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.5.645-648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., He, Y., Oliveira, A. M. D., Coco, A. L., Zappulla, C., Kaspar, V., & DeSouza, A. (2004). Loneliness and social adaptation in Brazilian, Canadian, Chinese and Italian children: A multi-national comparative study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00329.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Wang, L., & Cao, R. (2011). Shyness-sensitivity and unsociability in rural Chinese children: Relations with social, school, and psychological adjustment. Child Development, 82, 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01616.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coplan, R. J., & Bowker, J. C. (2014). All alone: Multiple perspectives on the study of solitude. In R. J. Coplan & J. C. Bowker (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 150–166). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsano, P., Majorano, M., Michelini, G., & Musetti, A. (2011). Solitudine e autodeterminazione in adolescenza [Loneliness and self-determination during adolescence]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 4, 473–498. https://doi.org/10.3280/RIP2011-004003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankaert, E., Guse, T., & van Zyl, C. J. J. (2017). Validation of the motivation for solitude scale-short form (MSS-SF) in a group of South African adolescents. Manuscript submitted for review.

  • Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Billet (2011). Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, L., & Louw, L. (2000). Culture and self in South Africa: Individualism/Collectivism predictions. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540009600461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, C. A., Gelfand, M. J., Kruglanski, A. W., Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., & Pierro, A., et al. (2010). On “feeling right” in cultural contexts: How person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective wellbeing. Psychological Science, 21, 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galanaki, E. P. (2005). Solitude in the school: A neglected facet of children’s development and education. Childhood Education, 81, 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2005.10522255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanaki, E. P (2013). Solitude in children and adolescents: A review of the research literature. Psychology and Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 50, 79–88Special 50th Anniversary Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanaki, E. P. (2015). Solitude as a state of positive aloneness in childhood and adolescence. In C. J. Kowalski, J. P. Cangemi & A. Rokach (Eds.), Loneliness in life: Education, business, and society (pp. 168–190). Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Medical Care, 44(11, Suppl 3), S78–S94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens, L. (2014). Affinity for aloneness in adolescence and preference for solitude in childhood: Linking two research traditions. In R. J. Coplan & J. C. Bowker (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 150–166). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goossens, L., Lasgaard, M., Luyckx, K., Vanhalst, J., Mathias, S. & Masy, E. (2009). Loneliness and solitude in adolescence: A confirmatory factor analysis of alternative models. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 890–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens, L., & Marcoen, A. (1999). Adolescent loneliness, self-reflection, and identity: From individual differences to developmental processes. In K. J. Rotenberg & S. Hymel (Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 225–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, L. M., & Gullone, E. (2006). The clinical significance of loneliness: A literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, G., & von Brachel, R. (2014). Multiple-Group confirmatory factor analysis in R: A tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal indicators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are they odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JASP Team (2016). JASP (Version 0.8.0.0) [Computer software].

  • Kroger, J. (1998). Adolescence as a second separation-individuation process: Critical review of an object relations approach. In E. E. A. Skoe & A. L. von der Lippe (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross-national and life span perspective. Adolescence and society (pp. 172–192). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W. (1997). The emergence of solitude as a constructive domain of experience in early adolescence. Child Development, 68, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01927.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W. (1999). The uses of loneliness in adolescence. In K. J. Rotenberg & S. Hymel (Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 244–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1978). Experiential correlates of time alone in adolescence. Journal of Personality, 46, 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00191.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1980). The significance of time alone in adolescent development. Journal of Current Adolescent Medicine, 2, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2007). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS-MINISTEP: Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL: winsteps.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2015). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Chen, X., Coplan, R. J., Ding, X., Zarbatany, L., & Ellis, W. (2015). Shyness and unsociability and their relations with adjustment in Chinese and Canadian children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114567537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Little, T. D., & Preacher, K. J. (2011). Methodological issues in using structural equation models for testing differential item functioning. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt & J. Billiet (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 55–84). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, C. R., & Averill, J. R. (2003). Solitude: an exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, M., Vanhalst, J., Spithoven, A. W., van den Noortgate, W., & Goossens, L. (2016). Loneliness and attitudes toward aloneness in adolescence: A person-centered approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0354-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maes, M., Wang, J. M., van den Noortgate, W., & Goossens, L. (2015). Loneliness and attitudes toward being alone in Belgian and Chinese adolescents: Examining measurement invariance. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 1408–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0336-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majorano, M., Musetti, A., Brondino, M., & Corsano, P. (2015). Loneliness, emotional autonomy and motivation for solitary behavior during adolescence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3436–3447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0145-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1993). Loneliness, attitude towards loneliness and solitude: Age differences and developmental significance during adolescence. In S. Jackson & H. Rondriguez-Tomé (Eds.), Adolescence and its social worlds (pp. 197–227). East Sussex: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes: No. 17. www.statmodel.com.

  • Nicol, C. C. (2005). Self-determined motivation for solitude and relationship: Scale development and validation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Carbondale, IL. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3195333).

  • Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness (pp. 1–18). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, E., Uleman, J., Lee, H. K., & Roman, R. J. (1995). Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualist and collectivist cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, K. H. (2014). On solitude, withdrawal and social isolation. In R. J. Coplan & J. C. Bowker (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 150–166). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickley, A., Koyanagi, A., Koposov, R., Schwab-Stone, M., & Ruchkin, V. (2014). Loneliness and health risk behaviours among Russian and U.S. adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14, 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld, P. (1982a). Aloneness as a healing experience. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 54–67). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld, P. (1982b). Aloneness as a healing experience. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 54–65). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teppers, E., Klimstra, T. A., Damme, C. V., Luyckx, K., Vanhalst, J., & Goossens, L. (2013). Personality traits, loneliness, and attitudes toward aloneness in adolescence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 1045–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513481445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teppers, E., Luyckx, K., Vanhalst, J., Klimstra, T., & Goossens, L. (2014). Attitudes towards aloneness during adolescence: a person‐centred approach. Infant and Child Development, 23, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V. & Azmitia, M. (2014). Motivation matters: Development of a short form measure of solitude for adolescents and emerging adults. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Austin, TX. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3414t2qv.pdf.

  • Triandes, H. (1989). The self and social behaviour in differencing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, T., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthén, B. (2013). Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox., J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Staden, W. C., & Coetzee, K. (2010). Conceptual relations between loneliness and culture. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 23, 524–529. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833f2ff9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, L., & Laher, S. (2009). The relationship between individualism/collectivism and the Five Factor Model of personality: an exploratory study. Psychology in Society, 37, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyse their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2006). Culture and solitude. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts. (Unpublished master’s thesis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelenski, J. M., Sobocko, K., & Whelan, D. C. (2014). Introversion, solitude and subjective well-being. In R. J. Coplan & J. C. Bowker (Eds.), The handbook of solitude: Psychological perspectives on social isolation, social withdrawal, and being alone (pp. 150–166). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyphur, M. J. & Oswald, F. L. (2012). Bayesian probability and statistics in management research: A new horizon. Journal of Management, 39, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312463183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contributions

C. v. Z. designed and executed the study, conducted the data analyses, and wrote the paper. T. G. collaborated with the data collection, writing of the paper and editing of the final manuscript. E. D. collected the data and collaborated with the writing of the literature review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casper J. J. van Zyl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The University of Johannesburg’s Faculty of Humanities Research Ethics Committee approved the study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zyl, C.J.J.v., Dankaert, E. & Guse, T. Motivation for Solitude: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Adolescents from Collectivist and Individualist Cultures in South Africa. J Child Fam Stud 27, 697–706 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0916-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0916-0

Keywords

Navigation