Skip to main content
Log in

The Government's Choice of Bureaucratic Organisation: An Application to Italian State Museums

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Italian state museums are characterised by a rigid bureaucratic structure and are almost completely financed by government transfers. In this paper we develop a simplified two-stage model in an attempt to explain how the government's preferences for differentiated museum functions may affect museum organisation. The model shows that the government prefers that complementary functions (e.g., conservation and scientific research) be produced by a single museum, whereas it prefers that substitutable functions (e.g., conservation and access by the general public) be produced by two museums. We use this prediction for an empirical analysis of the organisational structure of Italian state museums.

On the basis of the unique ISTAT census of the Italian museum system, we test with two separate probit models the probability of observing in a state museum the concentration of either scientific activities of conservation and research or promotion activities for education and the general public. Higher classes of centralisation for the state museums are also considered by means of an ordered probit model. The results seem to suggest that the Italian state museum structure, as surveyed in the early 1990s, fully reflected the traditional policy model viewing museums as institutions devoted to conservation, scientific research and education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainis, N. (1998) “Lo statuto giuridico dei musei.” Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico 48: 393–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, S.J. and Falconer, P. (1998) “Charging for Admission to Museums and Galleries: A Framework for Analysing the Impact on Access.” Journal of Cultural Economics 22: 167–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, L. (1992) Le politiche dei beni culturali in Europa Bologna: il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, L. (1996) “Le politiche pubbliche per i beni culturali: programmi, attori, interazioni”, in Le nuove professionalitá della cultura, Quaderno dell'Osservatorio culturale della Regione Lombardia, n. 16: 15–26.

  • Bodo, C. (2003) Italy. Cultural Policies in Europe: A Compendium of Basic Facts and Trends, Council of Europe/ERICarts. Document available at http://www.ericarts.org.

  • Castelnuovo, E. (1985) Arte, industria, rivoluzioni: temi di storia sociale dell'arte. Torino: Einaudi.

  • Cecchini, F. (1997) “Nota sui beni culturali.” Economia della Cultura 7: 77–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corte dei Conti (2002) Relazione sul rendiconto generale dello stato 2001. Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali. Volume II. Document available at http://www.corteconti.it.

  • Delli Quadri, L.M.R. (2004) in Valentino, P.A. and Delli Quadri, L.M.R (eds): “Objettivo futuro. Musei, didattica e ricerca nel Nord America,” 233–241.

  • De Santis, V. (2001) “La gestione del museo nell'esperienza italiana: evoluzione normativa e prospettive di cambiamento.” Consiglio di Stato 52: 499–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedeli, S. (1999) “Competing Bureaus and Politicians: A Compliance Approach to the Diversion of Public Funds.” Public Choice 100: 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedeli, S. and Santoni, M. (2000) “Centralizzazione o decentralizzazione: la scelta governativa dell'organizzazione burocratica,” in V. Dardanoni and G. Sobbrio (eds.), Istituzioni politiche e finanza pubblica. Milano: Franco Angeli.

  • Fedeli, S. and Santoni, M. (2001) “Endogenous Institutions in Bureaucratic Compliance Games.” Economics of Governance 2: 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1994) “Cultural Economics and Museum Behaviour.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 41: 325–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1998) “Superstar Museums: An Economic Analysis.” Journal of Cultural Economics 22: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1989) Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Meier, S. (2003) “The Economics of Museums,” Forthcoming in Ginsburgh, V. and Throsby, D. (eds.), Handbook for Economics of Art and Culture. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Fusco, M.A. (2004) in Valentino, P.A. and Delli Quadri, L.M.R (eds): “Tra Pinocchio e Gianburrasca ovvero la via italiana all'edutainment,” 294–306.

  • Galluzzi, P. (1997) “Nuove tecnologie e funzione culturale dei musei,” in Galluzzi, P. and Valentino, P.A. (eds), I formati della memoria. Firenze: Giunti editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. and Thomas, B. (1998) “The Economics of Museums: A Research Perspective.” Journal of Cultural Economics 22: 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, J. and Gray, C.M. (1993) The Economics of Art and Culture. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Horn, H. and Wolinsky, A. (1988) “Worker Substitutability and Patterns of Unionisation.” Economic Journal 98: 484–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (1995) Indagine sui musei ed istituzioni similari al 31 dicembre 1992. Roma: ISTAT.

  • Maddison, D. (2004) “Causality and Museum Subsidies.” Journal of Cultural Economics 28: 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, D. and Foster, T. (2003) “Valuing Congestion Costs in the British Museum,” Oxford Economic Papers 55: 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, F. and Vanden Eeckaut, P. (2002) “Museum Assessment and FDH Technology: Towards a Global Approach.” Journal of Cultural Economics 26: 261–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. J. (1977) “Bureaucratic Compliance as a Game on the Unit Square.” Public Choice 29: 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T.M. (1984) “The New Economics of Organization.” American Political Science Review 88: 739–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossetto, G. and Vecco, M. (2001) “Le strategie di trasformazione dei musei,” in Valentino P.A. and Mossetto G. (eds.), Museo contro museo. Le strategie gli strumenti i risultati. Firenze: Giunti editore.

  • Niskanen, W. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacetti, P. (2004) in Valentino, P.A. and Delli Quadri L.M.R (eds): “Quando il museo propone al pubblico educazione e diletto.” 349–376.

  • Peacock, A.T. (2000) “Public Financing of the Arts in England.” Fiscal Studies 21: 171–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J.M. (1998) “Neither Public nor Private: The Hybridisation of Museums.” Journal of Cultural Economics 22: 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciullo, G. (2001) “Le innovazioni legislative,” in Valentino, P.A. and Mossetto, G. (eds.), Museo contro museo. Le strategie gli strumenti i risultati. Firenze: Giunti editore.

  • Settis, S. (2002) Italia S.p.A., Torino: Einaudi.

  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1994) “Politicians and Firms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 995–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. and Vives, X. (1984) “Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly.” RAND Journal of Economics 15: 546–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentino, P.A. (1992) “Gli ingranaggi delle ‘macchine del tempo’: la struttura economica delle organizzazioni museali,” in Valentino, P.A. (ed.), L'immagine e la memoria. Milano: Leonardo Periodici.

  • Valentino, P.A. (1997) “Criteri e metodi per la scelta delle tecnologie informatiche applicabili ai beni culturali,” in Galluzzi, P. and Valentino, P.A. (eds.), I formati della memoria. Firenze: Giunti editore.

  • Valentino, P.A. and Delli Quadri, L.M.R. (eds.) (2004) Cultura in gioco. Le nuove frontiere di musei, didattica e industria culturale nell'era dell'interattività. Firenze: Giunti editore.

  • Villani, M. (1998) “Nuove tendenze e criteri di finanziamento dei musei statali italiani.” Economia della Cultura 8: 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Fedeli.

Additional information

JEL-Classification: D73, Z11

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fedeli, S., Santoni, M. The Government's Choice of Bureaucratic Organisation: An Application to Italian State Museums. J Cult Econ 30, 41–72 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-006-9005-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-006-9005-8

Key words

Navigation