Skip to main content
Log in

Convention on Cultural Diversity

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

UNESCO has given its Director General a mandate to draft a convention on protecting the diversity of cultural contents and artistic expressions by the fall of 2005. Proponents of the convention view commitments made by countries in trade agreements as weakening their ability to preserve and promote cultural diversity. We review the existing draft wording for a convention, developed before the official involvement of UNESCO, by the INCP, an association representing cultural ministries in favour of insulating their cultural policies from liberalization, and conclude that it fails to meet the necessary conditions for an enforceable rules-based international agreement. In the INCP text, countries are given rights to introduce policies that promote a self-defined cultural diversity. The only obligation is to balance their interests with those of others. No standard of adjudication for balance is offered nor any effective dispute resolution mechanism developed. The ultimate purpose of the initiative may be to form a negotiating bloc within the WTO, but the disparate interests of its members and the lack of tangible benefits from the Convention reduce the credibility of bargaining solidarity. In contrast, the WTO provides a flexible and effective forum for negotiating maintenance of current policy options at a cost of making concessions in other sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acheson, K. and Maule, C. (1999) Much Ado About Culture: North American Trade Disputes. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, S. and Schimmel, D. (1997) “The Cultural Exception: Does it Exist in GATT and GATS Frameworks? How does it Affect or is it Affected by the Agreement on TRIPS?” Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 15: 281–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, C. (1999) “When “Cultural Identity was not an Issue” Thinking about Canada-Certain Measures Concerning Periodicals,” Law & Policy in International Business 30: 231–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francois, P. and van Ypersele, T. (2002) “On the Protection of Cultural Goods,” Journal of International Economics 56: 359–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P. and Woods, C. (2002) Blockbusters and Trade Wars. Douglas and McIntyre, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, W.M. (1995) “Free Trade and Cultural Protectionism,” Yale Journal of International Law 20: 105–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebilcock, M. and Howse, R. (2001) The Regulation of International Trade (2nd ed.). Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acheson, K., Maule, C. Convention on Cultural Diversity. J Cult Econ 28, 243–256 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-004-3587-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-004-3587-9

Key words

Navigation