Abstract
Korean society has undergone a rapid demographic transition that has challenged traditional patterns of family exchanges. The structure and directions of support flows have become more complex as multiple generations coexist. This article examines the complexity of contemporary Korean intergenerational relationships. The study analyzed two different samples to address anticipated differences in perceptions of and attitudes toward relationships between adult children and elderly parents. The researchers used maximum likelihood latent structure analysis to discover the latent patterns of the association among three main subdimensions of intergenerational relationships: geographic proximity, exchange of support, and cultural norms of family support. Results show that the perspectives on intergenerational relationships differ significantly between middle-aged children and elderly parents. Intergenerational relationships among middle-aged adults comprise five distinct patterns: strong reciprocal, strong traditional, intermediate normative, intermediate circumstantial, and weak. The interpretation of intergenerational relationships from the elders’ perspectives is more straightforward, with only three patterns: traditional, reciprocal, and weak. Along with significant socioeconomic differences in the prevalent patterns of intergenerational relationships, these results emphasize the complex interplay of contingency and path dependency in diversifying the value and support exchanges of intergenerational relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burr, J., & Mutchler, J. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of household and nonhousehold living arrangements in later life. Demography, 28, 375–390.
Chang, K.-S. (1997). The neo-Confucian right and family politics in South Korea: The nuclear family as an ideological construct. Economy and Society, 26, 22–42.
Choi, J.-S. (2002). Hanguk eui chogi sawheihak kwa kajok yungu, [Early studies on sociology and family in Korea]. Seoul: Iillji sa.
DaVanzo, J., & Goldscheider, F. K. (1989). Pathways to independent living in early adulthood: Marriage, semi-autonomy, and premarital residential independence. Demography, 26, 597–614.
Dowd, J. (1975). Aging as exchange: A preface to theory. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 584–594.
Eliason, S. (1997). The categorical data analysis system: Supplemental user’s manual for command line, pre-release version 4.0 of Prog MLLSA for DOS and OS/2. Iowa: The University of Iowa.
Hogan, D., Eggebeen, D., & Clogg, C. (1993). The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1428–1458.
Jung, K.-H., Joe, A.-J., Oh, Y.-H., Byun, J.-G., & Moon, H.-S. (1998). Noin saingwhal siltai josa mit bokji yokgu josa [Survey on living condition and welfare need of the elderly]. Seoul: Korean Institute of Health and Social Affairs.
Kim, D.-S., Park, K.-S., & Lee, S.-Y. (1999). Hanguk chungyun cheung eui sedai kwankye wa nohu buyang kwan, [Intergenerational relationship and attitude toward old age security among Korean middle adults]. Hanguk Inguhak, Korean Journal of Population Association, 23/1, 55–90.
Korean National Statistical Office (1966). Census of population and housing. Seoul: Korean National Statistical Office.
Korean National Statistical Office (1980). Census of population and housing. Seoul: Korean National Statistical Office.
Korean National Statistical Office (1985). Census of population and housing. Seoul: Korean National Statistical Office.
Korean National Statistical Office (1990). Census of population and housing. Seoul: Korean National Statistical Office.
Korean National Statistical Office (1995). Census of population and housing. Seoul: Korean National Statistical Office.
Korean National Statistical Office (1999). Social indicators in Korea. Seoul: Korean National Statistical Office.
Korean National Statistical Office (2000). Census of population and housing. Seoul: Korean National Statistical Office.
Kwon, T.-H., & Park, Y.-J. (1995). Kajok eui kujo wa yuhyung, Structures and Patterns of families. In T.-H. Kwon, T.-H. Kim, & J.-H. Choi (Eds.), Hanguk eui ingu wa kajok, [Population and family of Korea] (pp. 269–365). Seoul: Illshin-Sa.
Litwak, E. (1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. New York: Guilford.
Park, K-S. (1999). Noin eui saingwhal kwa salm eui jil, The living environment and life quality of the elderly. In I-K. Kim, D-B. Kim, S-H. Mo, K-S. Park, Y-H. Won, Y-S. Lee, S-N. Cho (Eds.), Hanguk noin eui salm; Jindan kwa chonmang, [Life of elderly Koreans: Issues and prospects] (pp. 365–404). Seoul: Mirae-Inryuk-Kaibal.
Phua, V. C., Kaufman, G., & Park, K. S. (2001). Strategic adjustments of elderly Asian Americans: Living arrangements and headship. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32, 263–281.
Shanas, E. (1980). Older people and their families: The new pioneers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 9–15.
Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child–parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 429–460.
Wolf, D., & Soldo, B. (1988). Household composition choices of older unmarried women. Demography, 25, 387–403.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, KS., Phua, V., McNally, J. et al. Diversity and Structure of Intergenerational Relationships: Elderly Parent–Adult Child Relations in Korea. J Cross Cult Gerontol 20, 285–305 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9007-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9007-1