Abstract
Population aging is unique in Asia given the speed at which it is occurring and the immense social and economic changes that the region is experiencing at the same time. Compared to their Western counterparts, Asian governments have much less time to prepare for population aging. Asian countries that have traditionally relied on family-based support for older family members are worried that increased numbers of older adults may stress these family systems. At the same time, information concerning the effectiveness of formal programs for older adults is scarce. This paper reviews current research on informal support versus formal support of older adults in Southeast and East Asia, with a larger aim of assessing the current well-being of older Asians and suggesting areas of policy concern. Current research reveals that formal programs in the majority of Southeast and East Asian countries have very low coverage of today's older adults, and the figures for future generations are not that much higher. However, family support of older persons may not be deteriorating as predicted by modernization theory. Asian families continue to play a major role in supporting older members, thus policies should focus on enabling Asian families to provide this support.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
However, within these countries among certain ethnic groups, e.g., among the Chinese in Malaysia and Singapore, fertility rates are falling and these particular groups are aging rapidly.
This large shift in main source of financial support can partially be explained by a concomitant change in policies regarding pension income in Taiwan. For a detailed explanation of these policies see Biddlecom et al. (2001).
These studies can be found in a special issue of the Asia-Pacific Population Journal (December) 1997.
References
Asher, M. (1996). Financing old age in Southeast Asia, Southeast Asian Affairs.
Beard, V. A., & Kunharibowo, Y. (2001). Living arrangements and support relationships among elderly Indonesians: Case studies from Java and Sumatra. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 17–33.
Biddlecom, A. E., Hermalin, A. I., Ofstedal, M. B., Chang, M. C., & Chuang, Y. L. (2001). Tradeoffs between public and private economic support of the elderly: Results from a natural experiment in Taiwan. Comparative Study of the Elderly in Asia Research Reports No. 01–58. Population Studies Center at the Institute for Social Research: University of Michigan.
Central Provident Fund (2006). http://www.cpf.gov.sg/cpf_info/goto.asp?page=overviewb.asp. Accessed 30 March 2006.
Chan, A. (1997). An overview of the living arrangements and social support exchanges of older Singaporeans. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12(4), 35–50.
Chan, A. (1999a). The social and economic consequences of aging in Asia: An introduction, Special Issue of the Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27(2), 1–7.
Chan, A. (1999b). The role of formal versus informal support of the elderly in Singapore: Is there substitution? Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27(2), 87–110.
Chan, A., Biddlecom, A., Ofstedal, M. B., & Hermalin, A. I. (2002). The relationship between formal and familial support of the elderly in Singapore and Taiwan. Asian MetaCentre Research Paper Series No. 9. Asia Research Institute, Singapore.
Chen, C. (1991). The determinants of satisfaction with living arrangements for the elderly in Taiwan. The Institute of Economics Academia Sinica Discussion Paper Number 9102.
Chow, N. (1997). The status quo. In K. Mehta (Ed.), Untapped resources: Women in ageing societies across Asia (pp. 7–22). Singapore: Times Academic.
Cowgill, D. O., & Holmes L. D. (Eds.), 1972. Ageing and modernization. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Cox, D., & Jimenez, E. (1992). Social security and private transfers in developing countries: The case of Peru, World Bank Economic Review, 6 (1),155–170.
DaVanzo, J., & Chan, A. (1994). Living arrangements of older Malaysians: Who coresides with their adult children? Demography, 31(1), 95–114.
Frankenberg, E., Beard, V., & Saputra, M. (1999). The kindred spirit: The ties that bind Indonesian children and their parents. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 27(2), 65–86.
Frankenberg, E., Chan, A., & Ofstedal, M. B. (2002). Stability and change in living arrangements in Indonesia, Singapore, and Taiwan, 1993–1999. Population Studies, 56, 201–213.
Goodkind, D., Anh, T. S., & Cuong, B. T. (1999). Reforming the old-age security system in Vietnam. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27(2), 139–162.
Hermalin, A. I. (1997). Drawing policy lessons for Asia from research on ageing. Asia Pacific Population Journal, 12(4), 89–102.
Hermalin, A. I. (2000). Challenges to comparative research on intergenerational transfers. Comparative Study of the Elderly in Asia Research Report No. 00–56. Population Studies Center at The Institute for Social Research: University of Michigan.
Hermalin, A. I. (2002). Theoretical perspectives, measurement issues, and related research. In A. I. Hermalin (Ed.), The well-being of the elderly in Asia: A four-country comparative study (pp. 101–142). Michigan: University of Michigan.
Hermalin, A.I., Roan, C., & Perez, A. (1998). The emerging role of grandparents in Asia. Comparative Study of the Elderly in Asia Research Report No. 98–52. Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.
Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Saengtienchai, C., Kespichayawattana, J., & Aungsuroch, Y. (2001). Psychological well-being Asian style. Population Studies Research Report No. 01-474. Population Studies Center at The Institute for Social Research: University of Michigan.
Kim, I. (1999). Population aging in Korea: Social problems and solutions, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 26(1), 107–123.
Kinsella, K. (2000). Demographic dimensions of ageing in East and Southeast Asia. In D. R. Phillips (Ed.), Ageing in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues, policies and future trends (pp. 35–50). London: Routledge Advances in Asia-Pacific Studies.
Knodel, J., & Chayovan, N. (1997). Family support and living arrangements of Thai older persons, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12(4), 51–68.
Knodel, J., Chayovan, N., Graisurapong, S., & Suraratdecha, C. (2000). Ageing in Thailand: An overview of formal and informal support. In D. R. Phillips (Ed.), Ageing in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues, policies and future trends (pp. 243–266). London: Routledge Advances in Asia-Pacific Studies.
Knodel, J., & Debavalya, N. (1997). Living arrangements and support among the older persons in South-East Asia: An introduction. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12(4), 5–16.
Knodel, J., & Saengtienchai, C. (1999). Studying living arrangements of the elderly: Lessons from a quasi qualitative case study approach in Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 14(3), 197–220.
Lau, B. W. K., & Pritchard, C. (2001). The suicide of older people in Asian societies: An international comparison. Australasian Journal of Ageing, 20(4), 196–202.
Lee, Y. J., Parish, B., & Willis, R. (1994). Sons, daughters and intergenerational support in Taiwan. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1010–1041.
Maeda, D., & Ishikawa, H. (2000). Ageing in Japan: Retirement, daily lives, pensions, and social security. In D. R. Phillips (Ed.), Ageing in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues, policies and future trends (pp. 113–132). London: Routledge Advances in Asia-Pacific Studies.
Martin, L. (1989). Living arrangements of the older persons in Fiji, Korea, Malaysia and the Philippines. Demography, 26(4), 627–643.
Martin, L. (1990). Changing intergenerational family relations in East Asia. ANNALS, 510, 102–114.
Martin, L., & Kinsella, K. (1994). The demography of aging in developing countries. In S. Preston, & L. Martin (Eds.), The demography of aging (pp. 356–404). Washington, District of Columbia: National Research Council, National Academy.
Mason, K. O. (1992). Family change and support of the older persons in Asia: What do we know? Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7(3), 13–32.
Mehta, K., Osman, M., & Lee, A. (1995). Living arrangements of the elderly in Singapore: Cultural norms in transition. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10(1&2), 113–143.
Natividad, J., & Cruz, G. T. (1997). Patterns in living arrangements and familial support for the older persons in the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12(4), 17–34.
Ngin, C. S., & DaVanzo, J. (1999). Parent–child coresidence and quasi co-residence in Peninsular Malaysia. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 27(2), 43–64.
Ofstedal, M. B., Knodel, J., & Chayovan, N. (1999). Intergenerational support and gender: A comparison of four Asian countries. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 27(2), 21–42.
Phillips, D. R. (Ed.) (2000). Ageing in the Asia-Pacific region: Issues, policies and future trends. London: Routledge Advances in Asia-Pacific Studies.
Schoeni, R. (1992). Another leak in the bucket? Public transfer income and private family support. Population Studies Center Research Report No. 92-249. University of Michigan.
Seth, M. (2002). The effect of modernization and urbanization on the social status of the elderly in the Malay Muslim community in Singapore. MA theses. National University of Singapore.
Sobieszczyk, T., Knodel, J., & Chayovan, N. (2002). Gender and well-being among the elderly: Evidence from Thailand. Population Studies Center Research Report No. 02-531 (December), Population Studies Center at the Institute for Social Research: University of Michigan.
Teo, P. (1994). The national policy on older persons in Singapore. Ageing and Society, 14, 405–427.
Truong, S. A., Cuong, B. T., Goodkind, D., & Knodel, J. (1997). Living arrangements, patrilineality and sources of support among older persons Vietnamese. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12(4), 69–88.
UNESCAP (1999). Population ageing and development: Implications for Asia and the Pacific. http://unescap.org/ageing.
World Bank (1994). Averting the old age crisis: Policies to protect and promote growth. Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chan, A. Aging in Southeast and East Asia: Issues and Policy Directions. J Cross Cult Gerontol 20, 269–284 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9006-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-006-9006-2