Skip to main content
Log in

A 4D natural selection model illuminates the enigma of altruism in the Shedao pit viper

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics Aims and scope

Abstract

Endemic to a small island off the coast of China, the Shedao pit viper, Gloydius shedaoensis, is known for its ‘accidental altruism.’ Juvenile pit vipers often kill passerine birds too large to swallow. Large prey carcasses are scavenged by neighboring adults. In turn, adult pit vipers kill hawks that prey on juvenile pit-vipers, but are not a threat to the adults themselves. Using agent-based computer simulations, we quantified the lifetime fitness of pit viper breeders with one of three genotypes: selfish, altruistic or both selfish and altruistic. Our simulation was based on a four-dimensional (4D) model of social behavior which included interactions of pit viper offspring with predators and prey as well as conspecifics. Results showed that, over ten breeding seasons, pit viper breeders with flexible altruistic and selfish genotypes averaged seven times the number of surviving offspring relative to breeders with pure-selfish genotypes, and 23 times the number of surviving offspring as breeders with pure-altruistic genotypes. In summary, viewing animal behavior through the lens of the 4D model will extend our understanding of the evolutionary pathway to social behaviors through natural selection processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerji A., Morin P. J. (2009) Phenotypic plasticity, intraguild predation and anticannibal defences in an enigmatic polymorphic ciliate. Functional Ecology 23: 427–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D. L. (2002) Yoyo-bang: A risk aversion investment strategy by a perennial insect society. Oecologia 132: 150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D. L. (2005) The social gene. Journal of Bioeconomics 7: 73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D. L. (2006) Why skew selection, a model of parental exploitation, should replace kin selection. Journal of Bioeconomics 8: 101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D. L., Kuriachan I., Vinson S. B. (2007) A test of two skew models to explain cooperative breeding among unrelated individuals. Journal of Bioeconomics 9: 19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassill D.L., Watkins A. (2010) The emergence of cooperative hierarchies by natural selection processes. Journal of Bioeconomics, 12: 29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D. (1966) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 12: 119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner R. C. (1986) Pseudo-reciprocity: Investing in mutualism. Animal Behaviour 34: 1562–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner R. C. (1995) The benefits of mutualism: A conceptual framework. Biological Review 70: 427–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corning P.A. (1996) The co-operative gene: On the role of synergy in evolution. Evolutionary Theory, 11: 183–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin M. T. (1974) The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of Californian Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford A. Jr. (2000) The bioeconomics of cooperation. Journal of Bioeconomics 2: 153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A. (2006) Optimization of inclusive fitness. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 238: 541–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper K. R. (1999) Risk-spreading and bet-hedging in insect population biology. Annual Review Entomology 44: 535–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa J.T. (1998) Bioeconomics of schooling fishes: Selfish fish, quasi-free riders, and other fishy tales. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 53: 353–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landa J.T. (1999) Bioeconomics of some nonhuman and human societies: New institutional economics approach. Journal of Bioeconomics, 1: 95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R. (1983) Santa Rosalia was a goat: Ecologists have for two decades made assumptions about the importance of competition in community organization; that idea is now under vigorous attack. Science 221: 638–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin R., Lewin R. (1983) Predators and hurricanes change ecology: Results from direct experimentation in natural communities has reemphasized the importance of predators and climate in community organization. Science 221: 737–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J.-L. (1995) China snake island. Liaoning Science and Technology Press, Dalian

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippi T., Seger J. (1989) Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 4: 41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sall J., Lehman A., Creighton L. (2001) JMP start statistics: A guide to statistics and data analysis using JMP and JMP IN software. Duxbury Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Seger J, Brockmann H.J. (1987) What is bet-hedging?. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 4: 182–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine R. (1983) Arboreality in snakes: Ecology of the Australian elapid genus Hoplocephalus. Copeia, 1983: 198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R., Sun L.-X., Fitzgerald M., Kearney M. (2002a) Accidental altruism in insular pit vipers (Gloydius shedaoensis, Viperidae). Evolutionary Ecology 16: 541–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R., Sun L.-X., Kearney M., Fitzgerald M. (2002b) Why do juvenile Chinese pit vipers (Gloydius shedaoensis) select arboreal sites?. Ethology 108: 897–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D. (1982) The status of competition theory in ecology. Annals of the Zoologici Fennici 19: 241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun L. (1990) Observation on the pattern of activities of Agkistrodon shedaoensis Zhao. In: Zhao E. (eds) From water onto land. China Forestry Press, Beijing, pp 277–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun L.-X., Shine R., Debi Z., Zhengren T. (2002) Low costs, high output: Reproduction in an insular pit-viper (Gloydius shedaoensis, Viperidae) from north-eastern China. Journal of Zoology, London 256: 511–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers R. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüster W., Duarte M. R., Salomão M. G. (2005) Morphological correlates of incipient arboreality and ornithophagy in island pitvipers, and the phylogenetic position of Bothrops insularis. Journal of Zoology, London 266: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young B. A., Lee C. E., Kylle M. D. (2002) Do snakes meter venom?. BioScience 52: 1121–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao E., Wu G., Yang W. (1979) Comparisons of toxicity and neutralization test among Pallas’ pit viper, Snake-Island pit viper and black eye-brow pit viper (English summary). Act Herpetology Sinica Service 3: 1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deby Cassill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassill, D., Hardisty, B. & Watkins, A. A 4D natural selection model illuminates the enigma of altruism in the Shedao pit viper. J Bioecon 13, 17–29 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9095-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-010-9095-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation