Skip to main content
Log in

Automata-Based Axiom Pinpointing

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Axiom pinpointing has been introduced in description logics (DL) to help the user understand the reasons why consequences hold by computing minimal subsets of the knowledge base that have the consequence in question (MinA). Most of the pinpointing algorithms described in the DL literature are obtained as extensions of tableau-based reasoning algorithms for computing consequences from DL knowledge bases. In this paper, we show that automata-based algorithms for reasoning in DLs and other logics can also be extended to pinpointing algorithms. The idea is that the tree automaton constructed by the automata-based approach can be transformed into a weighted tree automaton whose so-called behaviour yields a pinpointing formula, i.e., a monotone Boolean formula whose minimal valuations correspond to the MinAs. We also develop an approach for computing the behaviour of a given weighted tree automaton. We use the DL \(\mathcal{SI}\) as well as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) to illustrate our new pinpointing approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baader, F.: Augmenting concept languages by transitive closure of roles: an alternative to terminological cycles. In: Proc. of the 12th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’91) (1991)

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Hladik, J., Peñaloza, R.: Automata can show PSPACE results for description logics. Inf. Comput. 206(9–10), 1045–1056 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Hollunder, B.: Embedding defaults into terminological knowledge representation formalisms. J. Autom. Reason. 14, 149–180 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: Axiom pinpointing in general tableaux. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods (TABLEAUX 2007). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4548, pp. 11–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: Automata-based axiom pinpointing. In: Armando, A., Baumgartner, P., Dowek, G. (eds.) Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2008). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5195, pp. 226–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: Blocking and pinpointing in forest tableaux. LTCS-Report LTCS-08-02, Chair for Automata Theory. Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Dresden University of Technology, Germany. http://lat.inf.tu-dresden.de/research/reports.html (2008)

  8. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: Axiom pinpointing in general tableaux. J. Log. Comput. 20, 5–34 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Baader, F., Sattler, U.: An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics. Stud. Log. 69, 5–40 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Baader, F., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Debugging SNOMED CT using axiom pinpointing in the description logic \(\mathcal{EL}^+\). In: Proc. of the International Conference on Representing and Sharing Knowledge Using SNOMED (KR-MED’08), Phoenix, Arizona (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baader, F., Tobies, S.: The inverse method implements the automata approach for modal satisfiability. In: Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2083, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baier, C., Katoen, J.P.: Principles of Model Checking. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: Reasoning in expressive description logics with fixpoints based on automata on infinite trees. In: Proc. of the 16th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’99), pp. 84–89. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: 2ATAs make DLs easy. In: Proc. of the 2002 Description Logic Workshop (DL 2002). CEUR Electronic Workshop Proceedings, pp. 107–118. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-53/ (2002)

  15. Droste, M., Kuich, W., Rahonis, G.: Multi-valued MSO logics over words and trees. Fundam. Inform. 84(3, 4), 305–327 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Droste, M., Rahonis, G.: Weighted automata and weighted logics on infinite words. In: Ibarra, O.H., Dang, Z. (eds.) Developments in Language Theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4036, pp. 49–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabbay, D., Pnueli, A., Shelah, S., Stavi, J.: On the temporal analysis of fairness. In: Proc. of the 7th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL’80), pp. 163–173 (1980)

  18. Grätzer, G.: General Lattice Theory, 2nd edn. Birkhäuser, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: RACER system description. In: Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2083, pp. 701–705. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horrocks, I.: Using an expressive description logic: FaCT or fiction? In: Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’98), pp. 636–647 (1998)

  21. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a web ontology language. JWS 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Horridge, M., Sirin, E.: Finding all justifications of OWL DL entailments. In: Proc. of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference and 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4825, pp. 267–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kupferman, O., Lustig, Y.: Lattice automata. In: Cook, B., Podelski, A., (eds.) 8th International Conference on Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation (VMCAI’07). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4349, pp. 199–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.: Safraless decision procedures. In: Proc. of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS05), pp. 531–542. IEEE Computer Society (2005)

  25. Lee, K., Meyer, T., Pan, J.Z.: Computing maximally satisfiable terminologies for the description logic \(\mathcal{ALC}\) with GCIs. In: Proc. of the 2006 Description Logic Workshop (DL 2006). CEUR Electronic Workshop Proceedings, vol. 189 (2006)

  26. Lutz, C., Sattler, U.: The complexity of reasoning with Boolean modal logic. In: Wolter, F., Wansing, H., de Rijke, M., Zakharyaschev, M. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 3, pp. 329–348. CSLI, Stanford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Kalyanpur, A.: Debugging OWL ontologies. In: Ellis, A., Hagino, T. (eds.) Proc. of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’05), pp. 633–640. ACM, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: Proc. of the 18th Annual Symp. on the Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’77), pp. 46–57 (1977)

  29. Pnueli, A., Rosner, R.: On the synthesis of a reactive module. In: Proc. of the 16th Annual ACM Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL’89), pp. 319–327. ACM, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rabin, M.O.: Weakly definable relations and special automata. In: Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed.) Proc. of Symp. on Mathematical Logic and Foundations of Set Theory, pp. 1–23. North-Holland Publ., Amsterdam (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rahonis, G.: Weighted Muller tree automata and weighted logics. J. Autom. Lang. Comb. 12(4), 455–483 (2007)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Reiter, R.: A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artif. Intell. 32(1), 57–95 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Schlobach, S.: Diagnosing terminologies. In: Veloso, M.M., Kambhampati, S. (eds.) Proc. of the 20th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2005), pp. 670–675. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schlobach, S., Cornet, R.: Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies. In: Gottlob, G., Walsh, T. (eds.) Proc. of the 18th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003), Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 355–362. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schlobach, S., Huang, Z., Cornet, R., Harmelen, F.: Debugging incoherent terminologies. J. Autom. Reason. 39(3), 317–349 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmidt-Schauß, M., Smolka, G.: Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artif. Intell. 48(1), 1–26 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Seidl, H.: Finite tree automata with cost functions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 126(1), 113–142 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Sirin, E., Parsia, B.: Pellet: an OWL DL reasoner. In: Proc. of the 2004 Description Logic Workshop (DL 2004), pp. 212–213 (2004)

  39. Tarski, A.: A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pac. J. Math. 5, 285–309 (1955)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. In: Proc. of the 16th ACM SIGACT Symp. on Theory of Computing (STOC’84), pp. 446–455 (1984)

  41. Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. A preliminary version appeared in Proc. of the 16th ACM SIGACT symp. on theory of computing (STOC’84). J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 32, 183–221 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Wolper, P., Vardi, M.Y., Prasad Sistla, A.: Reasoning about infinite computation paths. In: Proc. of the 24th Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science (SFCS’83), pp. 185–194. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1983)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franz Baader.

Additional information

Franz Baader partially supported by NICTA, Canberra Research Lab., and Rafael Peñaloza funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under grant GRK 446.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baader, F., Peñaloza, R. Automata-Based Axiom Pinpointing. J Autom Reasoning 45, 91–129 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-010-9181-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-010-9181-2

Keywords

Navigation