Abstract
A relationship between behavioral variability and artifactual variability is a founding principle of archaeology. However, this relationship is surprisingly not well studied empirically from an explicitly “microevolutionary” perspective. Here, we experimentally simulated artifactual variation in two populations of “artifact” manufacturers, involving only a single behavioral difference in terms of their “tradition” of manufacturing tool. We then statistically analyzed shape variation in the resultant artifacts. In many respects, patterned differences might not have been expected to emerge given the simple nature of the task, the fact that only a single behavioral variable differed in our two populations, and all participants copied the same target artifact. However, multivariate analyses identified significant differences between the two “assemblages.” These results have several implications for our understanding and theoretical conceptualization of the relationship between behavior and artifactual variability, including the analytical potency of conceiving of artifacts as the product of behavioral “recipes” comprised of individual “ingredient” behavioral properties. Indeed, quite trivial behavioral differences, in generating microevolutionarily potent variability, can thus have long-term consequences for artifactual changes measured over time and space. Moreover, measurable “cultural” differences in artifacts can emerge not necessarily only because of a strict “mental template” but as the result of subtle differences in behavioral ingredients that are socially learned at the community level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashburner, M., & Novitski, E. (Eds.). (1976). The genetics and biology of Drosophila, Vol. 1a. New York: Academic Press.
Ashburner, M., Golic, K., & Hawley, R. S. (2005). Drosophila: a laboratory handbook (2nd ed.). New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Bataillon, T., Joyce, P., & Sniegowski, P. (2013). As it happens: current directions in experimental evolution. Biology Letters, 9, 20120945.
Bleed, P. (1986). The optimal design of hunting weapons: maintainability or reliability? American Antiquity, 51, 737–747.
Bookstein, F. L. (1989). “Size and shape”: a comment on semantics. Systematic Zoology, 38, 173–180.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Buchanan, B., & Hamilton, M. J. (2009). A formal test of the origin of variation in North American Early Paleoindian projectile points. American Antiquity, 74, 279–298.
Clarke, D.L. (1968). Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.
Deetz, J. (1967). Invitation to archaeology. Garden City, New York: The Natural History Press.
Edwards, S. W. (2001). A modern knapper’s assessment of the technical skills of the Late Acheulean biface workers at Kalambo Falls. In J. D. Clark (Ed.), Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site (Vol. 3, pp. 605–611). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eerkens, J. W. (2000). Practice effects makes within 5% of perfect: visual perception, motor skills, and memory in artifact variation. Current Anthropology, 41, 663–668.
Eerkens, J. W., & Lipo, C. P. (2005). Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture and the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24, 316–334.
Eerkens, J. W., & Lipo, C. P. (2007). Cultural transmission theory and the archaeological record: providing context to understanding variation and temporal changes in material culture. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24, 316–334.
Eren, M. I., Briggs, B., & O’Brien, M. J. (2015). Social learning and technological evolution during the Clovis colonization of the New World. Journal of Human Evolution, 80, 159–170.
Falsetti, A. B., Jungers, W. L., & Cole, T. M. (1993). Morphometrics of the Callitrichid forelimb: a case study in size and shape. International Journal of Primatology, 14, 551–572.
Futuyma, D. J., & Bennett, A. F. (2009). The importance of experimental studies in evolutionary biology. In T. Garland & M. R. Rose (Eds.), Experimental evolution: concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 15–30). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Garland, T., & Rose, M. R. (Eds.). (2009). Experimental evolution: concepts, methods, and applications. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1969). The triumph of the Darwinian method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gowlett, J. A. J. (2006). The elements of design form in Acheulian bifaces: modes, modalities, rules and language. In N. Goren-Inbar & G. Sharon (Eds.), Axe age: Acheulian tool-making from quarry to discard (pp. 203–221). London: Equinox.
Gowlett, J. A. J. (2010). The future of lithic analysis in Palaeolithic archaeology: a view from the Old World. In S. J. Lycett & P. R. Chauhan (Eds.), New perspectives on old stones: analytical approaches to Palaeolithic technologies (pp. 295–309). New York: Springer.
Greenspan, R. J. (2004). Fly pushing: the theory and practice of Drosophila genetics (2nd ed.). New York: Cold Springer Harbor Laboratory Press.
Hamilton, M. J., & Buchanan, B. (2009). The accumulation of stochastic copying errors causes drift in culturally transmitted technologies: quantifying Clovis evolutionary dynamics. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 55–69.
Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. (2001). PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1–9.
Hampton, O. W. (1999). Culture of stone: sacred and profane uses of stone among the Dani. College Station: Texas A&M.
Heyes, C. M. (1994). Social learning in animals: categories and mechanisms. Biological Reviews, 69, 207–231.
Jordan, P. (2015). Technology as a human social tradition: cultural transmission among hunter-gatherers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jungers, W. L., Falsetti, A. B., & Wall, C. E. (1995). Shape, relative size, and size-adjustments in morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 38, 137–161.
Kempe, M., Lycett, S. J., & Mesoudi, A. (2012). An experimental test of the accumulated copying error model of cultural mutation for Acheulean handaxe size. PLoS ONE, 7, e48333.
Krause, R. (1985). The clay sleeps: an ethnoarchaeological study of three African potters. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability. In J. Shibley Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67–101). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lycett, S. J. (2008). Acheulean variation and selection: does handaxe symmetry fit neutral expectations? Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2640–2648.
Lycett, S. J. (2009). Quantifying transitions: morphometric approaches to Palaeolithic variability and technological change. In M. Camps & P. R. Chauhan (Eds.), Sourcebook of Palaeolithic transitions: methods, theories, and interpretations (pp. 79–92). New York: Springer.
Lycett, S. J. (2015). Cultural evolutionary approaches to artifact variation over time and space: basis, progress, and prospects. Journal of Archaeological Science, 56, 21–31.
Lycett, S. J. (2016). The importance of a “quantitative genetic” approach to the evolution of artifact morphological traits. In L. Mendoza-Straffon (Ed.), Cultural phylogenetics: concepts and applications in archaeology. New York: Springer Press.
Lycett, S. J., & von Cramon-Taubadel, N. (2015). Toward a “quantitative genetic” approach to lithic variation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22, 646–675.
Lycett, S. J., von Cramon-Taubadel, N., & Foley, R. A. (2006). A crossbeam co-ordinate caliper for the morphometric analysis of lithic nuclei: a description, test and empirical examples of an application. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 847–861.
Lycett, S. J., Schillinger, K., Kempe, M., & Mesoudi, A. (2015). Learning in the Acheulean: insights from experiments using handaxe form as a “model organism”. In A. Mesoudi & K. Aoki (Eds.), Learning strategies and cultural evolution during the Paleolithic (pp. 155–166). Springer: New York.
Lycett, S.J., Schillinger, K., Eren, M.I., von Cramon-Taubadel, N., & Mesoudi, A. (2016). Factors affecting Acheulean handaxe variation: experimental insights, microevolutionary processes, and macroevolutionary outcomes. Quaternary International, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.021
Lyman, R. L., VanPool, T. L., & O’Brien, M. J. (2009). The diversity of North American projectile-point types, before and after the bow and arrow. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 1–13.
Mahius, M. C. (1993). Pottery techniques in India: technical variants and social choice. In P. Lemonnier (Ed.), Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: Routledge.
McGrew, W. C. (2004). The cultured chimpanzee: reflections on cultural primatology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meltzer, D. J. (1981). A study of style and function in a class of tools. Journal of Field Archaeology, 8, 313–326.
Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: how Darwinian Theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mesoudi, A., & O’Brien, M. J. (2008). The cultural transmission of Great Basin projectile point technology I: an experimental simulation. American Antiquity, 73, 3–28.
Mueller, L. D. (2009). Fitness, demography, and population dynamics in laboratory experiments. In T. Garland & M. R. Rose (Eds.), Experimental evolution: concepts, methods, and applications (pp. 197–216). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Neiman, F. D. (1995). Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois Woodland ceramic assemblages. American Antiquity, 60, 7–36.
O’Brien, M. J., & Lyman, R. L. (2000). Applying evolutionary archaeology: a systematic approach. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
O’Brien, M. J., Holland, T. D., Hoard, R. J., & Fox, G. L. (1994). Evolutionary implications of design and performance characteristics of prehistoric pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1, 259–304.
O'Brien, M. J., Lyman, R. L., Mesoudi, A., & VanPool, T. L. (2010). Cultural traits as points of analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 3797–3806.
Orton, C., Tyers, P., & Vince, A. (1993). Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, J. J., Schiffer, M. B., & Rathe, W. L. (1975). Behavioral archaeology: four strategies. American Anthropologist, 77, 864–869.
Rice, P. M. (1987). Pottery analysis: a source book. University of Chicago Press
Robert, M., & Chevrier, E. (2003). Does men’s advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1136–1145.
Roche, H. (2005). From simple flaking to shaping: stone-knapping evolution among early hominins. In V. Roux & B. Bril (Eds.), Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behavior (pp. 35–48). Cambridge: Mc-Donald Institute Monographs.
Rogers, D. S., Feldman, M. W., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2009). Inferring population histories using cultural data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 276, 3835–3843.
Rohlf, F.J. (2010). TpsDig2 v2.16. Stony Brook, N.Y., Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York. Electronic document. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/. Accessed 4 Mar 2015.
Sackett, J. R. (1990). Style and ethnicity in archaeology: the case for isochrestism. In M. W. Conkey & C. A. Hastorf (Eds.), The uses of style in archaeology (pp. 32–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1987). Theory and experiment in the study of technological change. Current Anthropology, 28, 595–622.
Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1997). The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity, 62, 27–50.
Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2014a). Copying error and the cultural evolution of “additive” versus “reductive” material traditions: an experimental assessment. American Antiquity, 79, 128–143.
Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2014b). Considering the role of time budgets on copy-error rates in material culture traditions: an experimental assessment. PloS One, 9, e97157.
Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2015). The impact of imitative versus emulative learning mechanisms on artifactual variation: implications for the evolution of material culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 446–455.
Shennan, S. (2000). Population, culture history, and the dynamics of culture change. Current Anthropology, 41, 811–835.
Shennan, S. (2011). Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1070–1079.
Shepard, A.O. (1965). Ceramics for the archaeologist. Publication No. 609. Washington, D.C: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Skibo, J. M., & Schiffer, M. B. (1995). The clay cooking pot: an exploration of women’s technology. In J. M. Skibo, W. H. Walker, & A. E. Nielsen (Eds.), Expanding Archaeology (pp. 80–91). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Skibo, J. M., & Schiffer, M. B. (2001). Understanding artifact variability and change: a behavioral framework. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Anthropological perspectives on technology (pp. 139–149). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Sokal, R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry (3rd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman.
Smallwood, A. M. (2012). Clovis technology and settlement in the American Southeast: using biface analysis to evaluate dispersal models. American Antiquity, 77, 689–713.
VanPool, T. L. (2001). Style, function, and variation: identifying the evolutionary importance of traits in the archaeological record. In T. D. Hunt & G. F. M. Rakita (Eds.), Style and function: conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology (pp. 119–140). Westport: Bergin and Garvey.
VanPool, T. L., Palmer, C. T., & VanPool, C. S. (2008). Horned serpents, tradition, and the tapestry of culture. In M. J. O’Brien (Ed.), Cultural transmission and archaeology: issues and case studies (pp. 77–90). Washington: Society for American Archaeology Press.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
Wallaert, H. (2008). The way of the potter's mother: apprenticeship strategies among Dii potters from Cameroon, West Africa. In M. T. Stark , B. J. Bowser, & L. Horne (Eds.), Cultural transmission and material culture (pp. 178–198). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Wendrich, W. (1999). The world according to basketry: an ethno-archaeological interpretation of basketry production in Egypt. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African and Amerindian Studies, Universiteit Leiden.
Wynn, T. G., Tierson, F. D., & Palmer, C. T. (1996). Evolution of sex differences in spatial cognition. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 39, 11–42.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel, Metin Eren, and the anonymous reviewers and editors at JAMT for helpful and constructive comments on this paper. This research was partly supported by the Leverhulme Trust (F/07 476/AR) and by the Research Foundation for the State University of New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 706 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A. & Lycett, S.J. Differences in Manufacturing Traditions and Assemblage-Level Patterns: the Origins of Cultural Differences in Archaeological Data. J Archaeol Method Theory 24, 640–658 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9280-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9280-4