Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge, Know-how and Raw Material - The Production of Late Neolithic Flint Daggers in Scandinavia

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the craftsmanship of the Late Neolithic flint daggers in Scandianvia is investigated. The purpose of the investigation is to map the degree of skill invested in each production stage of the daggers and then relate the degree of craftsmanship to social factors. This is achieved by applying an operational-chain approach to the dagger production system, and by comparison with anthropologically and historically documented crafts in traditional societies. It is concluded that the daggers required knowledge of complicated recipes of action as well as a well-developed muscle memory that can only be acquired through practice. Thus, the craft is interpreted as demanding some form of an institutionalised apprenticeship system that could guarantee that it could be reproduced for at least 24 generations. It is further suggested that the flint dagger technology was consciously organised to keep the recipes of action of the technology exclusive to certain segments of the society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel, J. (2000). Flint daggers and technological knowledge. Production and consumption during LN I. In D. Olausson & H. Vandkilde (Eds.), Form, function and context. Material culture studies in Scandinavian archaeology (pp. 135-154.) Lund: Almqvist and Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, J. (2001). Daggers, Knowledge and Power, Coast to Coast Books 3, Uppsala.

  • Apel, J. & Darmark, K. (2007). Den flathuggna pilspetsens fylogeni. Mellansvenskt stenhantverk ur ett kulturevolutionistiskt perspektiv. In N. Stenbäck (Ed.), Stenålder i Uppland. Uppdragsarkeologi och eftertanke (pp. 31–65). Uppsala: Arkeologi E4 Uppland - Studier vol 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel, J. & Knutsson, K. (Eds.), (2006). Skilled Production and Social Reproduction. Aspects on Traditional Stone-Tool Technologies. Proceedings from an International Symposium held in Uppsala August 20–24, 2003, Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis. SAU Stone Studies 2, Uppsala.

  • Barrowclough, D. A. & Lister, A. R. (2004). The secrets of the Craft production of Scandinavian late neolithic flint daggers. Lithic Technology, 29, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C.-J. (1988). Sydskandinavisk flint i nordsvenske fund fra mellem- og sen-neolitisk tid. Iskos, 7, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1983). In pursuit of the past. Decoding the archaeological record. New York: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B. (1975). Lithic Reduction Sequences: A Glossary and Discussion. In: E. Swanson (Ed.), Lithic technology: Making and using stone tools (pp. 5–14) The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (1995). Traditional Metalworking in Kenya, Oxford: Oxbow.

  • Callahan, E. (1979). The Basic of Biface knapping in the eastern fluted point tradition. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 7, 1–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, E. (1996). The basics of Biface knapping in the eastern fluted point tradition: A manual for Flintknappers and Lithic analysts (second edition). Archaeology of Eastern North America, 7, 1–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, E. (2006). Neolithic Danish Daggers: an experimental peek. In J. Apel & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Skilled Production and Social Reproduction. Aspects on Traditional Stone-Tool Technologies. Proceedings from an International Symposium held in Uppsala August 20–24, 2003 (pp. 115–137), Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis. SAU Stone Studies 2, Uppsala.

  • Childs, T. S. (1999). “After all, a Hoe bought a wife”: The social dimensions of Ironworking among the Toro of East Africa. In M.-A. Dobres & C. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The social dynamics of technology (pp. 23–45) Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, D. E. (1972). An Introduction to Flintworking, Occasional Papers of the Idaho State University Museum 20, Pocatello, Idaho.

  • Dobres, M-A. (1999). Technology’s Links and Chaînes: The processual unfolding of technique and technician. In M.-A. Dobres & C. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The social dynamics of technology (pp. 124–146.) Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres, M-A. (2000). Technology and social agency: Outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B. V. (Ed.) (2000). Flintstudier. En hånbog i systematiske analyser af flintinventarier. Aarhus: Aarhus universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forssander, J. E. (1936). Der Ostskandinavische Norden während der ältesten Metallzeit Europas, Skrifter utgivna av Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskapssamfundet i Lund XXII, Lund.

  • Geneste, J-M. (1989). Les Industries de la Grotte Vaufrey: Technologie du Débitage, Economie et Circulation de la Matiere Premiére. In Rigaud, J. P. (Ed.), La Grotte Vaufrey, Mémoires de la Société Préhistorique Francaise, Paris.

  • Hansen, P. V., & Madsen, B. (1983). Flint Axe manufacture in the Neolithic. An Experimental Investigation of a Flint Axe Manufacture site at Hastrup Vaenget, East Zealand. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 2, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1990). Nimrods, Piscators, Pluckers, and Planters: The emergence of food production. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 9, 31–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1995). Pathways to power. Principles for creating socioeconomic inequalities. In T. D. Price & G. M. Feinman (Eds.), Foundations of social inequality (pp. 15–86) New York: Plenum Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, E. W. (1993). Iron, gender, and power. Rituals of transformation in African societies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1990). Commentary to Technology in the Humanities, Archaeological Review of Cambridge, 9(1): 154–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1992). Theory and practice in archaeology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högberg, A. (2006). Continuity of place: actions and narratives, In J. Apel & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Skilled Production and Social Reproduction. Aspects on Traditional Stone-Tool Technologies, Proceedings from an International Symposium held in Uppsala August 20–24, 2003, Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, SAU Stone Studies 2, Uppsala.

  • Lemonnier, P. (1990). Topsy Turvy Techniques. Remarks on the Social Representation of Techniques, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9(1): 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and speech. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, E. (1973). Die flintdolche Dänemarks. Studien über Chronologie und Kulturbeziehungen des südskandinavischen Spätneolithikums, Nordiske Fortidsminder, series B - in quatro, Bind 1,Copenhagen.

  • Madsen, B. (1986). Nogle taxonomiske og nomenklatoriske bemärkningar til studiet af flintteknologi - experimentelt og arkeologisk, Fjölnir, 5, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1979). Sociology and psychology. Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, S. (1902). Flintdolkene i den nordiske stenalder. Copenhagen: Nordiske Fortidsminder I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, G. R. (2006). Using the Jultand Type IC Neolithic Danish Dagger as a model to replicate parallel, edge-to-edge pressure flaking. In J. Apel & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Skilled Production and Social Reproduction. Aspects on Traditional Stone-Tool Technologies. Proceedings from an International Symposium held in Uppsala August 20–24, 2003 (pp. 81–113). Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis. SAU Stone Studies 2, Uppsala.

  • Olausson, D. (1997). Craft Specialization as an Agent of Social Power in the South Scandinavian Neolithic. In R. Schild & Z. Sulgostowska (Eds.), Man and Flint. proceedings of the VIIth International Flint Symposium Warszawa - Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski September 1995 (pp. 269–277) Warszawa: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Science.

  • Owens, D-A., & Hayden, B. (1998). Prehistoric rites of passage: A comparative study of transegalitarian Hunter-gatherers, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 16, 121–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrin, J. (1990). Prehistoric Lithic Technology: Some aspects of research. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9, 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelegrin, J. (2006). Long blade technology in the Old World. An experimental approach and some archaeological results, In J. Apel & K. Knutsson (Eds.), Skilled Production and Social Reproduction. Aspects on Traditional Stoone-Tool Technologies, Proceedings from an International Symposium held in Uppsala August 20–24, 2003, Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, SAU Stone Studies 2, Uppsala.

  • Pigeot, N. (1990). Technical and Social actors. Flintknapping Specialists and Apprentices at Magdalenian Etiolles. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9, 126–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. W. (1990). Dolkproduktion og -distribution i senneolitikum. Hikuin, 16, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riede, F. (2006). Châine Opératoire, Châine Evolutionaire? Putting Technological Sequences into an Evolutionary Perspective. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 21, 50–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, V. & Brill, B. (Eds.) (2006). Stone knapping: The necessary condition for a uniquely hominid behaviour. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarauw, T. (2007). The Danish Bell Beaker phenomenon. Bell Beakers and flint daggers - the display of social identities? Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Prehistoric Archaeology, University of Aarhus. Aarhus.

  • Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B., & Skibo, J. M. (1987). Theory and experiment in the study of technological change, Current Anthropology, 28, 595–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. & Skibo, J. M. (1997). The Explanation of Artifact Variability. American Antiquity, 62, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, N. (1990). Technique as human action: Two perspectives. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9, 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, N. (1994). Mindful technology: unleashing the chain operatoire for an archaeology of mind, In C. Renfrew & E. B. W. Zubrow (Eds.), The ancient mind. Elements of cognitive Archaeology (pp. 143–151.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellet, F. (1993). Chaîne opératoire: the concept and its applications. Lithic technology, 18, 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1990). Technology as phenotype: An extended look at time, energy and stone tools. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 9, 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M. (1998). In search of Hindsgavl: Experiments in the production of Neolithic Danish flint daggers. Antiquity, 72, 338–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M. (2003). The Parallel-flaked flint daggers of late Neolithic Denmark: An experimental perspective. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30, 1537–1550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensköld, E. (2004). Att berätta en senneolitisk historia. Sten och metall i södra Sverige 2350–1700 f. Kr., Stockholm Studies in Archaeology 34. Stockholm.

  • Stout, D. (2002). Skill and Cognition in Stone Tool Production. An Ethnographic Case Study from Irian Jaya, Current Anthropology, 43, 693–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, M. (2006a). Rethinking the lithic blade definition: towards a dynamic understanding, In J. Apel & Knutsson, K. (Eds.), Proceedings from an International Symposium held in Uppsala August 20–24, 2003, Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis. SAU Stone Studies 2, Uppsala.

  • Sørensen, M. (2006b). Teknologi og Tradition I Østarktis 2500 BC-1200 AD. En dynamisk teknologisk undersøgelse af litiske inventarer i de palæoeskimoiske traditioner Vol. 1, Tekst, Det Humanistiske fakultet, Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen.

  • Vandkilde, H. (1996). From stone to bronze. The Metalwork of the Late Neolithic and Earliest Bronze Age in Denmark. Aarhus: Jutland Archaeological Society Publications XXXII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varberg, J. (2005). Oprindelsen til en ny tidsalder. Mellem stenalder og bronzealder i Sydskandinavien 2350–1700 BC, Fornvännen, 100, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wąs M (2005) Technologia krzemieniarstwa kultury janisławickiej. Łódź.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis, Villvägen 6G, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden

    Jan Apel

Authors
  1. Jan Apel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Apel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apel, J. Knowledge, Know-how and Raw Material - The Production of Late Neolithic Flint Daggers in Scandinavia. J Archaeol Method Theory 15, 91–111 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-007-9044-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-007-9044-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation