Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with decision regret following oocyte cryopreservation (OC) in women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and/or age-related fertility decline (ARFD).
Methods
A cross-sectional survey study was conducted to five hundred fifty-two women with DOR and/or ARFD who underwent OC between 2014 and 2019 in two private-assisted reproductive units in Istanbul, Turkey. Decision regret was measured using the validated Decision Regret Scale (DRS).
Results
The median and mean DRS scores were 10 (interquartile range: 25) and 13.4 (SD: 13.2, range 0–70), respectively. Eighty-five (52.5%) women reported mild regret and 26 (16%) had moderate to severe regret. Decision regret was inversely associated with the belief in fate regarding childbearing and trust in the efficacy of OC.
Conclusions
The prevalence of severe decision regret among patients with DOR and/or ARFD undergoing OC is low. Women who had belief in fate and trusted in the efficacy of oocyte cryopreservation had significantly lower decisional regret.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Available.
References
Cil AP, Bang H, Oktay K. Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:492–9.e3.
Turkish legislation regarding oocyte cryopreservation [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/09/20140930-4.htm
Cohen J, Chabbert-Buffet N, Darai E. Diminished ovarian reserve, premature ovarian failure, poor ovarian responder—a plea for universal definitions. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1709–12.
Ata B, Seyhan A, Seli E. Diminished ovarian reserve versus ovarian aging. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31:139–47.
Morin SJ, Patounakis G, Juneau CR, Neal SA, Scott RT, Seli E. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1489–98.
Steiner AZ, Pritchard D, Stanczyk FZ, Kesner JS, Meadows JW, Herring AH, et al. Association between biomarkers of ovarian reserve and infertility among older women of reproductive age. JAMA. 2017;318:1367–76.
Pirtea P, Ayoubi JM. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation are not reliable markers for oocyte quality in young patients. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:67–8.
Hu S, Xu B, Jin L. Perinatal outcome in young patients with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:118–124.e1.
Dai X, Wang Y, Yang H, Gao T, Yu C, Cao F, et al. AMH has no role in predicting oocyte quality in women with advanced age undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–9.
Lyttle Schumacher BM, Jukic AMZ, Steiner AZ. Antimüllerian hormone as a risk factor for miscarriage in naturally conceived pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2018
Hanoch J, Lavy Y, Holzer H, Hurwitz A, Simon A, Revel A, et al. Young low responders protected from untoward effects of reduced ovarian response. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:1001–4.
Broekmans FJ, Soules MR, Fauser BC. Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:465–93.
Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Hastie J, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:1097–1104.e1.
Clark JA, Wray NP, Ashton CM. Living with treatment decisions: regrets and quality of life among men treated for metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:72–80.
Brehaut JC, O’Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Mak. 2003;23:281–92.
Becerra Pérez MM, Menear M, Brehaut JC, Légaré F. Extent and predictors of decision regret about health care decisions: a systematic review. Med Decis Mak. 2016;34:777–90.
Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1343–1349.e2.
Jones BP, Kasaven L, L’Heveder A, Jalmbrant M, Green J, Makki M, et al. Perceptions, outcomes, and regret following social egg freezing in the UK; a cross-sectional survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:324–32.
O’Connor A. User Manual - Decision Regret Scale. Ohri. 2003;1:1–3.
Ma Y, Cheng HY, Sit JWH, Chien WT. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of hypertension self-care profile. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020;Publish Ah:1–10.
Kılıç A, Göçmen İ. Fate, morals and rational calculations: freezing eggs for non-medical reasons in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2018;203:19–27.
Göçmen İ, Kılıç A. Egg freezing experiences of women in Turkey: from the social context to the narratives of reproductive ageing and empowerment. Eur J Women's Stud. 2018;25:168–82.
Ranganathan P, Pramesh C, Aggarwal R. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: logistic regression. Perspect Clin Res. 2017;8:148–51.
Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H, Lavery S. Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31:239–45.
Brown E, Patrick M. Time, Anticipation, and the life course: egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction. Am Sociol Rev. 2018;83:959–82.
Gürtin ZB, Shah T, Wang J, Ahuja K. Reconceiving egg freezing: insights from an analysis of 5 years of data from a UK clinic. Reprod BioMed Online. 2019;38:272–82.
Inhorn M, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Westphal L, Doyle J, Gleicher N, Meirow D, et al. Ten pathways to elective egg freezing: a binational, qualitative study of what leads healthy women to fertility preservation. Hum Reprod. 2018.
Pritchard N, Kirkman M, Hammarberg K, McBain J, Agresta F, Bayly C, et al. Characteristics and circumstances of women in Australia who cryopreserved their oocytes for non-medical indications. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2017;35:108–18.
Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, Pritchard N, Hickey M, Peate M, McBain J, et al. Reproductive experiences of women who cryopreserved oocytes for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:575–81.
Nekkebroeck J, Stoop DDP. A preliminary profile of women opting for oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:i14–7.
Stoop D. Oocyte vitrification for elective fertility preservation: lessons for patient counseling. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:603–4.
de Groot M, Dancet E, Repping S, Goddijn M, Stoop D, van der Veen F, et al. Perceptions of oocyte banking from women intending to circumvent age-related fertility decline. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1396–401.
Mutlu B. Morally accounting for sex selection online in Turkey. Biosocieties. 2017;12:543–67.
Inhorn MC, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Vale MD, Patrizio P. Abrahamic traditions and egg freezing: religious women’s experiences in local moral worlds. Soc Sci Med. 2020;253:29–76.
Nicoloro-SantaBarbara JM, Lobel M, Bocca S, Stelling JR, Pastore LM. Psychological and emotional concomitants of infertility diagnosis in women with diminished ovarian reserve or anatomical cause of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:161–7.
Dundar Akın O, Boza A, Yakin K, Urman B. Awareness of fertility and reproductive aging in women seeking oocyte cryopreservation, reproductive aged controls, and female health care professionals: a comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;233:146–50.
Mutlu B. Transnational biopolitics and family-making in secrecy: an ethnography of reproductive travel from Turkey to Northern Cyprus [Internet]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2019. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/122491
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all of the physicians and embryologists of the two IVF centers for contributing their patients and their help in extracting patient files. Also, we thank all of the women who had undergone oocyte cryopreservation and responded to our survey.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
2019. 209. IRB1.032 (IRB approval number).
Consent to participate
Available.
Consent for publication
Available.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key messages
Regret in women with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing oocyte cryopreservation is low. Women who had belief in fate and trusted the efficacy of oocyte cryopreservation had significantly lower regret levels.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurbuz, A., Cil, A.P., Karakis, L.S. et al. Decision regret and associated factors following oocyte cryopreservation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve and/or age-related fertility decline. J Assist Reprod Genet 38, 1469–1479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02164-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02164-7