Skip to main content
Log in

Live birth outcomes in infertile patients with class III and class IV obesity following fresh embryo transfer

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Assess the effect of class III (body mass index [BMI, kg/m2] 40–49.9) and class IV obesity (≥ 50) on clinical pregnancy and live birth outcomes after first oocyte retrieval and fresh embryo transfer cycle.

Design

Cohort study

Setting

Academic center

Patients

Patients undergoing their first oocyte retrieval with planned fresh embryo transfer in our clinic between 01/01/2012 and 12/31/2018. Patients were stratified by BMI: 18.5–24.9 (n = 4913), 25–29.9 (n = 1566) 30–34.9 (n = 559), 35–39.9 (n = 218), and ≥ 40 (n = 114).

Intervention

None

Main outcome measure

Live birth rate

Results

Following embryo transfer, there were no differences in pregnancy rates across all BMI groups (p value, linear trend = 0.86). However among pregnant patients, as BMI increased, a significant trend of a decreased live birth rate was observed (p value, test for linear trend = 0.004). Additionally, as BMI increased, a significant trend of an increased miscarriage rate was observed (p value, linear trend = < 0.001). Compared to the normal-weight cohort, women with a BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly higher rate of cancelled fresh transfers after retrieval (18.4% vs. 8.2%, OR 2.51; 95%CI 1.55–4.08). Among singleton deliveries, a significant trend of an increased c-section rate was identified as the BMI increased (p value, linear trend = <0.001).

Conclusion

Overall, patients with a BMI > 40 have worse IVF treatment outcomes compared to normal-weight patients. After embryo transfer, their pregnancy rate is comparable to normal-weight women; however, their miscarriage rate is higher, leading to a lower live birth rate for pregnant women in this population. Patients with a BMI > 40 have a c-section rate that is 50% higher than normal-weight patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. 2019;92:6–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hruby A, Hu FB. The epidemiology of obesity: a big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(7):673–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, Barrett JL, Giles CM, Flax C, et al. Projected U.S. State-Level Prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2440–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Haroush A, Sirota I, Salman L, Son W-Y, Tulandi T, Holzer H, et al. The influence of body mass index on pregnancy outcome following single-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dechaud H, Anahory T, Reyftmann L, Loup V, Hamamah S, Hedon B. Obesity does not adversely affect results in patients who are undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;127(1):88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Provost MP, Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Yeh JS, Steward RG, Eaton JL, et al. Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing body mass index: analysis of 239,127 fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(3):663–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shah DK, Missmer SA, Berry KF, Racowsky C, Ginsburg ES. Effect of obesity on oocyte and embryo quality in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Provost MP, Acharya KS, Acharya CR, Yeh JS, Steward RG, Eaton JL, et al. Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing recipient body mass index: an analysis of 22,317 fresh donor/recipient cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System registry. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(2):364–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rittenberg V, Seshadri S, Sunkara SK, Sobaleva S, Oteng-Ntim E, El-Toukhy T. Effect of body mass index on IVF treatment outcome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2011;23(4):421–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Metwally M, Ong KJ, Ledger WL, Li TC. Does high body mass index increase the risk of miscarriage after spontaneous and assisted conception? A meta-analysis of the evidence. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(3):714–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maheshwari A, Stofberg L, Bhattacharya S. Effect of overweight and obesity on assisted reproductive technology--a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(5):433–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Russo M, Ates S, Shaulov T, Dahan MH. Morbid obesity and pregnancy outcomes after single blastocyst transfer: a retrospective, North American study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(4):451–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894(Journal Article):i–xii, 1–253.

  14. Surrey ES, Bower J, Hill DM, Ramsey J, Surrey MW. Clinical and endocrine effects of a microdose GnRH agonist flare regimen administered to poor responders who are undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(3):419–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheung LP, Lam PM, Lok IH, Chiu TT, Yeung SY, Tjer CC, et al. GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(3):616–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tummon IS, Daniel SA, Kaplan BR, Nisker JA, Yuzpe AA. Randomized, prospective comparison of luteal leuprolide acetate and gonadotropins versus clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins in 408 first cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(3):563–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yarali H, Esinler İ, Polat M, Bozdag G, Tiras B. Antagonist/letrozole protocol in poor ovarian responders for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a comparative study with the microdose flare-up protocol. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):231–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dragisic KG, Davis OK, Fasouliotis SJ, Rosenwaks Z. Use of a luteal estradiol patch and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppression protocol before gonadotropin stimulation for in vitro fertilization in poor responders. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(4):1023–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunnala V, Melnick A, Irani M, Reichman D, Schattman G, Davis O, et al. Sliding scale HCG trigger yields equivalent pregnancy outcomes and reduces ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: analysis of 10,427 IVF-ICSI cycles. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176019 [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5404765/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Veeck LL, Zaninovic N. An Atlas of Human Blastocysts. 1st ed. New York: CRC Press; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Bellver J, Pellicer A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Ballesteros A, Remohi J, Meseguer M. Obesity reduces uterine receptivity: clinical experience from 9,587 first cycles of ovum donation with normal weight donors. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):1050–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bellver J, Martínez-Conejero JA, Labarta E, Alamá P, Melo MAB, Remohí J, et al. Endometrial gene expression in the window of implantation is altered in obese women especially in association with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2335–2341.e8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jungheim ES, Schon SB, Schulte MB, DeUgarte DA, Fowler SA, Tuuli MG. IVF outcomes in obese donor oocyte recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(10):2720–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Setton R, Chung A, Zimmerman L, Melnick A, Rosenwaks Z, Spandorfer SD. Body mass index is not associated with donor oocyte recipient success: an ideal study using a paired analysis of sibling-oocytes. F&S Reports. 2020;1(1):25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steiner N, Ates S, Shaulov T, Shrem G, Volodarsky-Perel A, Dahan SY, et al. A comparison of IVF outcomes transferring a single ideal blastocyst in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and normal ovulatory controls. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302(6):1479–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sha T, Wang X, Cheng W, Yan Y. A meta-analysis of pregnancy-related outcomes and complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF. Reprod BioMed Online. 2019;39(2):281–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Machtinger R, Combelles CM, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Fox JH, Racowsky C. The association between severe obesity and characteristics of failed fertilized oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(11):3198–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Robker RL. Evidence that obesity alters the quality of oocytes and embryos. Pathophysiology. 2008;15(2):115–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hou Y-J, Zhu C-C, Duan X, Liu H-L, Wang Q, Sun S-C. Both diet and gene mutation induced obesity affect oocyte quality in mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):18858.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldman KN, Hodes-Wertz B, McCulloh DH, Flom JD, Grifo JA. Association of body mass index with embryonic aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):744–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kroon B, Harrison K, Martin N, Wong B, Yazdani A. Miscarriage karyotype and its relationship with maternal body mass index, age, and mode of conception. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1827–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Landres IV, Milki AA, Lathi RB. Karyotype of miscarriages in relation to maternal weight. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(5):1123–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldman RH, Farland LV, Thomas AM, Zera CA, Ginsburg ES. The combined impact of maternal age and body mass index on cumulative live birth following in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(6):617.e1–617.e13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Romanski PA, Farland LV, Tsen LC, Ginsburg ES, Lewis EI. Effect of class III and class IV obesity on oocyte retrieval complications and outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(2):294–301.e1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Friedler S, Cohen O, Liberty G, Saar-Ryss B, Meltzer S, Lazer T. Should high BMI be a reason for IVF treatment denial? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(11):853–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Alexandra MacWade for her help in proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Spandorfer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

IRB approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board at Weill Cornell Medical College.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romanski, P.A., Bortoletto, P., Magaoay, B. et al. Live birth outcomes in infertile patients with class III and class IV obesity following fresh embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 38, 347–355 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02011-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-02011-1

Keywords

Navigation