Skip to main content
Log in

Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We used computer assisted sperm selection (MSOME) during cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection to test whether this technique improves results over traditional ICSI protocols. We also used the TUNEL assay to test whether MSOME could deselect physiologically abnormal spermatozoa.

Methods

Individual spermatozoa were examined with MSOME. Normal and abnormal spermatozoa were tested for the level of DNA fragmentation using TUNEL assay. In a prospective, randomized trial, patients were selected for standard ICSI, or IMSI techniques. We tested the two groups for biological and clinical parameters.

Results

64.8% of spermatozoa, otherwise selectable for ICSI, were characterized by abnormalities after computer-assisted sperm analysis. These sperm were also characterized by an increase in the level of DNA fragmentation. We noted an increase in embryo quality, pregnancy and implantation rates after computerized sperm selection during ICSI procedures.

Conclusions

Computerised selection of spermatozoa during ICSI procedures deselects physiological abnormal spermatozoa and improves clinical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Palermo GD, Cohen J, Alikani M, Adler A, Rosenwaks Z. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel treatment for all forms of male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1231–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim AS, Tsakok MF. Age-related decline in fertility: a link to degenerative oocytes? Fertil Steril. 1997;68:265–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherins RJ, Thorsell LP, Dorfmann A, Dennison-Lagos L, Calvo LP, Krysa L, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection facilitates fertilization even in the most severe forms of male infertility: pregnancy outcome correlates with maternal age and number of eggs available. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:369–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauer MV. The impact of age on reproductive potential: lessons learned from oocyte donation. Maturitas. 1998;30:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kini S, Morrell D, Thong KJ, Kopakaki A, Hillier S, Irvine DS. Lack of impact of semen quality on fertilization in assisted conception. Scott Med J. 2010;55:20–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell AJ, Irvine DS. Male infertility and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Br Med Bull. 2000;56:616–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ménézo Y, Dale B. Paternal contribution to successful embryogenesis. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1326–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl. 2002;23:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Ellenbogen A, Peer S, Feldberg D, Bartoov B. Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1787–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Lederman H, Peer S, Ellenbogen A, Feldberg B, et al. How to improve IVF-ICSI outcome by sperm selection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:634–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cassuto NG, Bouret D, Plouchart JM, Jellad S, Vanderzwalmen P, Balet R, et al. A new real-time morphology classification for human spermatozoa: a link for fertilization and improved embryo quality. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1616–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chelli MH, Albert M, Ray PF, Guthauser B, Izard V, Hammoud I, et al. Can intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection be used to select normal-sized sperm heads in infertile patients with macrocephalic sperm head syndrome? Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1347. e1-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Nicoletti AP, Baruffi RL, et al. Motile sperm organelle morphology examination is stricter than Tygerberg criteria. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:320–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, Katz N, Barr I, Fishman A, et al. The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1067–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nadalini M, Tarozzi N, Distratis V, Scaravelli G, Borini A. Impact of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection on assisted reproduction outcome: a review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 3:45–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H, et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hazout A, Dumont-Hassan M, Junca AM, Cohen Bacrie P, Tesarik J. High-magnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, d’Angelo D, et al. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:835–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kacem O, Sifer C, Barraud-Lange V, Ducot B, De Ziegler D, Poirot C, et al. Sperm nuclear vacuoles, as assessed by motile sperm organellar morphological examination, are mostly of acrosomal origin. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:132–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schlegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2008;89:823–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Benchaib M, Lornage J, Mazoyer C, Lejeune H, Salle B, François Guerin J. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:93–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Meseguer M, Santiso R, Garrido N, García-Herrero S, Remohí J, Fernandez JL. Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on pregnancy outcome depends on oocyte quality. Fertil Steril. 2010;(in press).

  25. De Placido G, Wilding M, Strina I, Alviggi E, Alviggi C, Mollo A, et al. High outcome predictability after IVF using a combined score for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2402–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wen SW, Leader A, White RR, Léveillé MC, Wilkie V, Zhou J, et al. A comprehensive assessment of outcomes in pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150:160–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hindryckx A, Peeraer K, Debrock S, Legius E, de Zegher F, Francois I, et al. Has the Prevalence of Congenital Abnormalities after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Increased? The Leuven Data 1994 –2000 and a Review of the Literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70:11–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ludwig AK, Hansen A, Katalinic A, Sutcliffe AG, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Thyen Ute. Assessment of vision and hearing in children conceived spontaneously and by ICSI: a prospective controlled, single-blinded follow-up study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:391–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilding M, Di Matteo L, D'Andretti S, Montanaro N, Capobianco C, Dale B. An oocyte score for use in assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:350–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L. Morphological selection of gametes. Placenta. 2008;29(Suppl B):115–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sartorius GA, Nieschlag E. Paternal age and reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:65–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sathananthan AH. Functional competence of abnormal spermatozoa. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;8:141–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Frattarelli JL, Leondires MP, Miller BT, Segars JH. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection increases embryo fragmentation without affecting clinical outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:207–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A grant from Merck-Serono was provided to Dr Coppola for this work. We thank Vincenzo Monfrecola for his assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Wilding.

Additional information

Capsule

The use of computer assisted sperm selection improves results after ICSI due to the deselection of physiologically abnormal spermatozoa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilding, M., Coppola, G., di Matteo, L. et al. Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 28, 253–262 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9505-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9505-5

Keywords

Navigation