Skip to main content
Log in

Cumulative exposure to high estradiol levels during the follicular phase of IVF cycles negatively affects implantation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of the cumulative exposure to estradiol (E2) during the follicular phase on IVF outcome.

Methods: Patients were stimulated with recombinant FSH after GnRH agonist suppression and had a day 3-embryo transfer. Estrogen exposure was determined as the area under the curve (AUC) for serum E2 levels measured from the first day of stimulation through the day after hCG administration.

Results: E2 AUC thresholds for 10th and 90th percentiles were 4704 pg/ml and 16338 pg/ml, respectively. The pregnancy and implantation rates were highest in the 10th–90th percentile group, and were statistically higher in this group than in the >90th percentile group (54.6% vs. 33.3% and 24.8% and 12.9%, respectively, for pregnancy and implantation rates, P < 0.05). Recovered mature oocytes, fertilization, and number and mean score of transferred embryos were similar.

Conclusions: High cumulative E2 exposure during the follicular phase of IVF cycles has detrimental effects on implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muasher SJ. Treatment of low responders. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;10:112–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Karande V, Gleicher N. A rational approach to the management of low responders in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1744–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoolcraft W, Schlenker T, Gee M, Stevens J, Wagley L. Improved controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in poor responder in vitro fertilization patients with a microdose follicle-stimulating hormone flare, growth hormone protocol. Fertil Steril 1997;67:93–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones HW Jr, Acosta A, Andrews MC, Garcia JE, Jones GS, Mantzavinos T, et al. The importance of the follicular phase to success and failure in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1983;40:317–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okamoto S, Healy DL, Howlett DT, Rogers PA, Leeton JF, Trounson AO, Wood EC. An analysis of plasma estradiol concentrations during clomiphene citrate-human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in an in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1986;63:736–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Forman R, Fries N, Testart J, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Frydman R. Evidence for an adverse effect of elevated serum estradiol concentrations on embryo implantation. Fertil Steril 1988;49: 118–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pellicer A, Ruiz A, Castellvi RM, Calatayud C, Ruiz M, Tarin JJ, Miro F, Bonilla-Musoles F. Is the retrieval of high numbers of oocytes desirable in patients treated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) and gonadotrophins? Hum Reprod 1989;4:536–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chenette PE, Sauer MV, Paulson RJ. Very high serum estradiol levels are not detrimental to clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;54:858–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 1990;53:870–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Toner JP, Brzyski RG, Oehninger S, Veeck LL, Simonetti S, Muasher SJ. Combined impact of the number of pre-ovulatory oocytes and cryopreservation on IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 1991;6:284–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon C, Cano F, Valbuena D, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2432–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. High estradiol levels and high oocyte yield are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1999;72:401–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu Ng EH, Yeung WS, Yee Lan Lau E, So WW, Ho PC. High serum oestradiol concentrations in fresh IVF cycles do not impair implantation and pregnancy rates in subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 2000;15:250–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Papageorgiou T, Guibert J, Goffinet F, Patrat C, Fulla Y, Janssens Y, Zorn JR. Percentile curves of serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian stimulation in 905 cycles stimulated with recombinant FSH show that high estradiol is not detrimental to IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2846–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levi AJ, Drews MR, Bergh PA, Miller BT, Scott RT Jr. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation does not adversely affect endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2001;76: 670–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pena JE, Chang PL, Chan LK, Zeitoun K, Thornton MH 2nd, Sauer MV. Supraphysiological estradiol levels do not affect oocyte and embryo quality in oocyte donation cycles. Hum Reprod 2002;17:83–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones GS, Garcia JE, Rosenwaks Z. The role of pituitary gonadotropins in follicular stimulation and oocyte maturation in the human. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984;59:178–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Padilla SL, Bayati J, Garcia JE. Prognostic value of the early serum estradiol response to leuprolide acetate in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;53:288–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kolibianakis EM, Albano C, Kahn J, Camus M, Tournaye H, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Exposure to high levels of luteinizing hormone and estradiol in the early follicular phase of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles is associated with a reduced chance of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003;79:873–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arslan M, Bocca S, Mirkin S, Barroso G, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization: two decades of experience after the birth of Elizabeth Carr. Fertil Steril 2005;84:555–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arslan M, Boca S, Jones E, Mayer J, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S. Effect of coasting on the implantation potential of embryos transfereed after cryopreservation and coasting. Fertil Steril 2005;84:867–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Csemiczky G, Wramsby H, Landgren BM. Luteal phase oestradiol and progesterone levels are stronger predictors than follicular phase follicle stimulating hormone for the outcome of in-vitro fertilization treatment in women with tubal infertility. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2396–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirkin S, Jones EL, Mayer JF, Stadtmauer L, Gibbons WE, Oehninger S. Impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on performance and outcome of transcervical uterine embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003;20:318–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Veeck LL. Preembryo grading. In: Atlas of human oocyte and early conceptus. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins 1991;2:121–44

  25. Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salzmann J, Roulier R. Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2427–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004;19:41–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Balasch J, Penarrubia J, Fabregues F, Vidal E, Casamitjana R, Manau D, Carmona F, Creus M, Vanrell JA. Ovarian responses to recombinant FSH or HMG in normogonadotrophic women following pituitary desensitization by a depot GnRH agonist for assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;7:35–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ertzeid G, Storeng R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice. Hum Reprod 2001;16: 221–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McKiernan SH, Bavister BD. Gonadotrophin stimulation of donor females decreases post-implantation viability of cultured one-cell hamster embryos. Hum Reprod 1998;13:724–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tarin JJ, Pellicer A. Consequences of high ovarian response to gonadotropins: a cytogenetic analysis of unfertilized human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1990;54:665–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Valbuena D, Martin J, de Pablo JL, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C. Increasing levels of estradiol are deleterious to embryonic implantation because they directly affect the embryo. Fertil Steril 2001;76:962–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ng EH, Lau EY, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Oocyte and embryo quality in patients with excessive ovarian response during in vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003;20:186–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Simon C, Garcia Velasco JJ, Valbuena D, Peinado JA, Moreno C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Increasing uterine receptivity by decreasing estradiol levels during the preimplantation period in high responders with the use of a follicle-stimulating hormone step-down regimen. Fertil Steril 1998;70:234–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharara FI. Low and high responders–at what levels of serum estradiol do things start to get fuzzy? Fertil Steril 1999;71:583–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Terriou P, Sapin C, Giorgetti C, Hans E, Spach JL, Roulier R. Embryo score is a better predictor of pregnancy than the number of transferred embryos or female age. Fertil Steril 2001;75: 525–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Remohi J, Ardiles G, Garcia-Velasco JA, Gaitan P, Simon C, Pellicer A. Endometrial thickness and serum oestradiol concentrations as predictors of outcome in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2271–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mirkin S, Gimeno TG, Bovea C, Stadtmauer L, Gibbons WE, Oehninger S. Factors associated with an optimal pregnancy outcome in an oocyte donation program. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003;20:400–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Caligara C, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Simon C. Factors that determine discordant outcome from shared oocytes. Fertil Steril 2003;80:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Toner JP, Hassiakos DK, Muasher SJ, Hsiu JG, Jones HW Jr. Endometrial receptivities after leuprolide suppression and gonadotropin stimulation: histology, steroid receptor concentrations, and implantation rates. Ann NY Acad Sci 1991;622:220–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Oehninger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arslan, M., Bocca, S., Arslan, E.O. et al. Cumulative exposure to high estradiol levels during the follicular phase of IVF cycles negatively affects implantation. J Assist Reprod Genet 24, 111–117 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9101-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9101-x

Keywords

Navigation