Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Light exposure of the ovum and preimplantation embryo during ART procedures

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposure to visible light (400–700 nm wavelengths) is an unnatural stress factor to preimplantation embryos cultured in vitro. This study investigated the spectral composition and intensity of light during IVF procedures, and calculated radiation doses reaching the embryo during handling and manipulation. The study shows that normal IVF procedure may result in stressing radiation doses, unless filters are applied. This is at present not sufficiently recognised. No Danish IVF clinics use filters to protect embryos against visible light. 95% of the radiation was from microscopes. Ambient light, in contrast, was not a significant contributor to light stress and the use of dark laboratories is not justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Takahashi M, Saka N, Takahashi H et al: Assessment of DNA damage in individual hamster embryos by comet assay. Mol Reprod Dev 1999;54: l–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Umaoka Y, Noda Y, Nakayama T et al: Effect of visual light in vitro on embryonic development in the hamster. Theriogenology 1992;38:1045–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schumacher A, Fischer B: Influence of visible light and room temperature on cell proliferation in preimplantation rabbit embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 84:197–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barlow P, Puissant F, Van Der Zwalmen P et al: In vitro fertilization, development, and implantation after exposure of mature mouse oocytes to visible light. Mol Reprod Dev 1992;33:297–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel JC: Cleavage of Mammalian Ova inhibited by Visible Light. Nature 1964;201:316–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schumacher A, Kesdogan J, Fischer B: DNA ploidy abnormalities in rabbit preimplantation embryos are not increased by conditions associated with in vitro culture. Mol Reprod Dev 2004;50:30–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kruger T, Stander FSH: The effect of fluorescent light on the cleavage of two-cell mouse embryos. South African Med J 1985;68:744–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Squirrell JM, Wokosin DL, White JG et al: Long-term two photon flourescence imaging of mammalian embryos without compromising viability. Nature Biotechnol 1999;17:763–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirao Y, Yanagimachi R: Detrimental effect of visible light on meiosis of mammalian eggs in vitro. J Exp Zool 1978;206: 365–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hockberger PE, Skimina TA, Centonze VE et al: Activation of flavin-containing oxidases underlies light-induced production of H2O2 in mammalian cells. PNAS 1999;96:6255–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aggarwal BB, Quintanilha AT, Cammack R et al: Damage to mitochondrial electron transport and energy coupling by visible light. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1978;502:367–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramadan-Talib Z, Prebble J: Photosensitivity of respiration in Neurospora mitochondria. A protective role for carotenoid. Biochem J 1978;176:767–75.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM: The Chemistry of oxygen radicals and other oxygen derived species. In: Halliwell B, Gutterdge JCM, editors. Free Radicals in Biology and medicine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1989, pp. 22–85.

  14. Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Lewis JB et al: Biological effects of blue light from dental curing units. Dent Mater 2004;20:150–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Noda Y, Goto Y, Umoka Y, Shiotani M, Nakayama T, Moti T: Culture of human embryos in alpha modification of Eagle's medium under low oxygen tension and low illumination. Fertil Steril 1994;62(5):1022–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Findley W, Gibbons WE: Environmentally controlled in vitro incubator. 1990;US patent no US4892830.

  17. Barnett DK, Bavister BD: What is the relationship between the metabolism of preimplantation embryos and their developmental competence? Mol Reprod Dev 1996;43(1):105–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Danish Medical Research Council, The Beckett Foundation, The Foundation of 17/12-1981, The Toyota Foundation, the A.P. Moller Foundation for the advancement of Medical Science and Clinical Institute Aarhus University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars D. M. Ottosen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ottosen, L.D.M., Hindkjær, J. & Ingerslev, J. Light exposure of the ovum and preimplantation embryo during ART procedures. J Assist Reprod Genet 24, 99–103 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9081-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9081-x

Keywords

Navigation