Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of maturation, meiotic competence, and chromosome aneuploidy of oocytes derived from two protocols for in vitro culture of mouse secondary follicles

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose : To compare maturation rates of mouse preantral follicles cultured using two previously reported follicle in vitro follicle culture protocols, and to compare the aneuploidy of oocytes derived from the two protocols with in vivo-matured control oocytes.

Methods : Mouse preantral follicles were either mechanically isolated then cultured in individual microdroplets, or enzymatically isolated and cultured in groups in a modified culture medium. Maturation of the follicles/oocytes and resulting oocyte aneuploidy rates were evaluated and compared.

Results : The mechanical isolation and individual culture protocol (M/I) resulted in higher follicle survival than the enzymatic isolation and group culture protocol (E/G) (89.1% versus 79.1%, p < 0.01), and better maturation to the metaphase 2 stage (61.5% versus 39.5%, p = 0.01) The rate of aneuploidy of oocytes not significantly higher in oocytes from the E/G group than the M/I group (15.4% versus 9.9%), but hypoploidy was significantly increased (4.7% versus 0.9%, p < 0.05). Both groups had a higher rate of aneuploidy than the control oocytes (2.9%, p < 0.02).

Conclusions : These results indicate an increased survival and competency of oocytes derived from the M/I protocol, compared to the E/G protocol. The data highlight an increased susceptibility to meiotic errors in early stage follicles undergoing in vitro culture, compared to in vivo-matured oocytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Macklon NS, Fauser BC: Follicle development during the normal menstrual cycle. Maturitas 1998;30:181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrell DT, Moskovtsev S, Chohan KR, Peterson CM: Ovarian folliculogenesis: Emerging role of in vitro maturation of oocytes and follicles in clinical practice. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003;46:239–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Qvist R, Blackwell LF, Bourne H, Brown JB: Development of mouse ovarian follicles from primary to preovulatory stages in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1990;89:169–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spears N, Boland NI, Murray AA, Gosden RG: Mouse oocytes derived from in vitro grown primary ovarian follicles are fertile. Hum Reprod 1994;9:527–532

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu J, Van der Elst J, Van den Broecke R, Dhont M: Live offspring by in vitro fertilization of oocytes from cryopreserved primordial mouse follicles after sequential in vivo transplantation and in vitro maturation. Biol Reprod 2001;64:171–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O'Brien MJ, Pendola JK, Eppig JJ: A revised protocol for in vitro development of mouse oocytes from primordial follicles dramatically improves their developmental competence. Biol Reprod 2003;68:1682–1686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem AC: In-vitro maturation, fertilization and embryo development of immature oocytes from early preantral follicles from prepuberal mice in a simplified culture system. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2656–2666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Demeestere I, Delbaere A, Gervy C, Van Den Bergh M, Devreker F, Englert Y: Effect of preantral follicle isolation technique on in-vitro follicular growth, oocyte maturation and embryo development in mice. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2152–2159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smitz JE, Cortvrindt RG: The earliest stages of folliculogenesis in vitro. Reproduction 2002;123:185–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mailhes JB, Young D, Caldito G, London SN: Sensitivity of mouse oocytes to nicotine-induced perturbations during oocyte meiotic maturation and aneuploidy in vivo and in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod 2000;6:232–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassold T, Hunt P: To err (meiotically) is human: The genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2001;2:280–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adriaens I, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J: Differential FSH exposure in preantral follicle culture has marked effects on folliculogenesis and oocyte developmental competence. Hum Reprod 2004;19:398–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarkovski AK: An air-drying method for chromosome preparation from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 1966;5:394–400

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salamanca F, Armendares S: C bands in human metaphase chromosomes treated by barium hydroxide. Ann Genet 1974;17:135–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun F, Betzendahl I, Shen Y, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Eichenlaub-Ritter U: Preantral follicle culture as a novel in vitro assay in reproductive toxicology testing in mammalian oocytes. Mutagenesis 2004;19:13–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eppig JJ, Schroeder AC: Capacity of mouse oocytes from preantral follicles to undergo embryogenesis and development to live young after growth, maturation, and fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 1989;41:268–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eichenlaub-Ritter U: Mechanisms of nondisjunction in mammalian meiosis. Curr Top Dev Biol 1994;29:281–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Betzendahl I: Chloral hydrate induced spindle aberrations, metaphase I arrest and aneuploidy in mouse oocytes. Mutagenesis 1995;10:477–486

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yin H, Baart E, Betzendahl I, Eichenlaub-Ritter U: Diazepam induces meiotic delay, aneuploidy and predivision of homologues and chromatids in mammalian oocytes. Mutagenesis 1998;13:567–580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin H, Cukurcam S, Betzendahl I, Adler ID, Eichenlaub-Ritter U: Trichlorfon exposure, spindle aberrations and nondisjunction in mammalian oocytes. Chromosome 1998; 107:514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun F, Yin H, Eichenlaub-Ritter U: Differential chromosome behaviour in mammalian oocytes exposed to the tranquilizer diazepam in vitro. Mutagenesis 2001;16:407–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts R, Iatropoulou A, Ciantar D, Stark J, Becker DL, Franks S, Hardy K: Follicle-stimulating hormone affects metaphase 1 chromosome alignment and increases aneuploidy in mouse oocytes matured in vitro. Biol Reprod 2005;72(1): 107–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Golbus MS: The influence of strain, maternal age, and method of maturation on mouse oocyte aneuploidy. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1981;31:84–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsuchiya K, Kamiguchi Y, Sengoku K, Ishikawa M: A cytogenetic study of in-vitro matured murine oocytes after ICSI by human sperm. Hum Reprod 2002;17:420–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu Y, Betzendahl I, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Eichenlaub-Ritter U: Effects of low O2 and ageing on spindles and chromosomes in mouse oocytes from pre-antral follicle culture. Hum Reprod 2001;16:737–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burke DJ: Complexity in the spindle checkpoint. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000;10:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shah JV, Cleveland DW: Waiting for anaphase: Mad2 and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 2000;103:997–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas T. Carrell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrell, D.T., Liu, L., Huang, I. et al. Comparison of maturation, meiotic competence, and chromosome aneuploidy of oocytes derived from two protocols for in vitro culture of mouse secondary follicles. J Assist Reprod Genet 22, 347–354 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-6793-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-6793-2

Key Words

Navigation