Skip to main content
Log in

Outdoor open thin-layer microalgal photobioreactor: potential productivity

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 07 January 2015

Abstract

We have previously estimated the productivity and photosynthetic efficiency of the microalga Chlorella sp. grown in an outdoor open thin-layer photobioreactor under climate conditions typical of the Middle European region, i.e. with many days unsuitable for intensive growth of algae (cloudy and rainy days, low air temperature, low solar PAR input).To estimate the real potential productivity of the bioreactor, we collected data on algae yields obtained during clear summer day periods. Cultivation was performed in fed-batch cycles in a bioreactor with a 224 m2 culture area (length 28 m, slope 1.7%), and a 6–7 mm-thick layer of algal culture. The suspension volume in the bioreactor was 2,000 L. The mean values found for Třeboň (49°N), Czech Republic, as an average of several sunny summer cultivation periods in July, were: net areal productivity, P net = 38.2 g dry weight (DW) m-2 day-1; net volumetric productivity, Pvol, = 4.3 g algal DW L-1 day-1, photosynthetic efficiency (based on PAR), ηnet = 7.05%. The peak values were: P net about 50 g (DW) m-2 day-1, ηnet about 9%. Algal growth rate was practically linear up to high biomass densities (40–50 g DW L-1, corresponding to an areal density of 240–300 g DW m-2), at which point the culture was harvested. The concentration of dissolved oxygen increased from about 10 mg L-1 at the beginning to about 23 mg L-1 at the end of culture area at noon. Use of the above-described technology for economical production of bioethanol is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borowitzka MA (1999) Economic evaluation of microalgal processes and products. In: Cohen E (ed) Chemicals from microalgae. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 387–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucha J, Lívanský K (1995) Novel outdoor thin-layer high density microalgal culture system: productivity and operational parameters. Arch Hydrobiol 106/Algolog Stud 76:129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucha J, Lívanský K (1999) Process of outdoor thin-layer cultivation of microalgae and blue-green algae and bioreactor for performing the process. US Patent 5981271 A

  • Doucha J, Lívanský K (2006) Productivity, CO2/O2 exchange and hydraulics in outdoor open high density microalgal (Chlorella sp.) photobioreactors operated in a Middle and Southern European climate. J Appl Phycol 18:811–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doucha J, Straka F, Lívanský K (2005) Utilization of flue gas for cultivation of microalgae (Chlorella sp.) in an outdoor open thin-layer photobioreactor. J Appl Phycol 17:403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doušková I, Doucha J, Lívanský K, Machát J, Novák P, Umysová D, Vítová M (2008) Microalgae as a means for converting flue gas CO2 into biomass with high content of starch. Proceedings of the Conference “Bioenergy: Challenges and Opportunities”, 6–9 April 2008, Guimaräes, Portugal pp 191–196

  • EUREKA project OE 221 (2006 and 2007) Use of carbon dioxide from flue gas for production of microalgae (in Czech). Current Reports for 2006 and 2007

  • Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O’Hare M, Kamen DM (2006) Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311(5760):506–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grobbelaar JU, Soeder CJ, Stengel E (1990) Modeling algal productivity in large outdoor cultures and waste treatment systems. Biomass 21:297–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig P, Grobbelaar JU, Soeder CJ, Groeneweg J (1988) On the mass culture of microalgae: areal density as an important factor for achieving maximal productivity. Biomass 15:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(30):11206–11210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubín Š, Borns E, Doucha J, Seiss V (1983) Light absorption and production rate of Chlorella vulgaris in light of different spectral composition. Biochem Physiol Pflanzen 178:193–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita M, Watanabe Y, Okawa T, Saiki H (2001) Photosynthetic productivity of conical helical tubular photobioreactors incorporating Chlorella sp. under various culture medium flow conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng 74:136–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pushparaj B, Pelosi E, Tredici MR, Pinzani E, Materassi R (1997) An integrated culture system for outdoor production of microalgae and cyanobacteria. J Appl Phycol 9:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond A (1988) A prerequisite for industrial microalgaculture: efficient utilization of solar irradiance. In: Stadler T, Mollion J, Verdus MC, Karamanos Y, Morvan H, Christiaen D (eds) Algal biotechnology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukenik A, Levy RS, Levy Y, Falkowski PG, Dubinsky Z (1991) Optimizing algal biomass production in an outdoor pond: a simulation model. J Appl Phycol 3:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torzillo G, Carlozzi P, Pushparaj B, Montaini E, Materassi R (1993) A two-plane tubular photobioreactor for outdoor culture of Spirulina. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:891–898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tredici MR (2004) Mass production of microalgae: photobioreactors. In: Richmond A (ed) Handbook of microalgal culture. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 178–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonshak A, Abeliovich A, Boussiba S, Arad S, Richmond A (1982) Production of Spirulina biomass: effects of environmental factors and population density. Biomass 2:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Doucha.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0513-1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doucha, J., Lívanský, K. Outdoor open thin-layer microalgal photobioreactor: potential productivity. J Appl Phycol 21, 111–117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9336-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9336-2

Keywords

Navigation