Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic Re-Evaluation of the Laurencia Complex (Rhodophyta) with a Description of L. Succulenta Sp. Nov. from Korea

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laurencia succulenta sp. nov. (Rhodophyta) is described from Korea. This species exhibits vegetative and reproductive structures typical of the genus, but is distinct from similar species in its epiphytic habitat and the fleshy, robust, thick and subcompressed thalli with basically distichous branching. In addition, it is readily distinguished from the most similar species, such as L. nipponica Yamada and L. okamurae Yamada, by the cystocarps with a somewhat protuberant ostiole. In a phylogenetic analysis of 47 species of the Laurencia Lamouroux complex from various localities around the world based on 49 morphological characters, four major clades (Laurencia, Chondrophycus palisadus (Yamada) Nam group, C. cartilagineus (Yamada) Garbary et Harper group and Osmundea Stackhouse assemblage), each of which forms a monophyletic group, were recognized. Among these, the Laurencia clade is basal to the overall assemblage, and is defined by the vegetative axis with four rather than two pericentral cells. The Osmundea clade is supported by autapomorphic characters for the genus, features associated with spermatangial formation of the filament type and tetrasporangial production from epidermal cells. By contrast, Chondrophycus, a genus characterized by a combination of features (vegetative axis with two pericentral cells, trichoblast-type spermatangial development and tetrasporangial production from pericentral cells), is paraphyletic, and the species were separated into two well-supported clades, the C. palisadus group and C. cartilagineus group. These clades are distinguished from each other by the position of the first pericentral cell relative to the trichoblast, the presence or absence of fertility at the second pericentral cells and number of sterile pericentral cells in the tetrasporangial axis, the pattern of formation of spermatangial branches on trichoblasts, post-fertilization feature associated with the formation time of the auxiliary cell, and, probably, the number of pericentral cells in the procarp-bearing segment. Of these features, the side position of the first pericentral cell in the latter group (a synapomorphy for the C. cartilagineus group plus Osmundea) suggests that the C. cartilagineus group is more closely related to Osmundea than to the C. palisadus group. This cladistic analysis indicates that Chondrophycus is not monophyletic, suggesting that the C. palisadus group should be separated from Chondrophycus at the genus level. Based on this result, Palisada (Yamada) stat. nov. is proposed for the group, together with an emendation of the generic delineation of Chondrophycus, and relevant nomenclatural changes for several Chondrophycus species are also included. In addition, Corynecladia J. Agardh is reinstated for the type species L. clavata Sonder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe T, Masuda M, Kawaguchi S, Kamura S (1998) Taxonomic notes on Laurencia brongniartii (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Phycological Research 46: 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott IA, Hollenberg GJ (1976) Marine algae of California. Stanford Univ. Press.

  • Agardh C (1822) Species Algarum. Vol. 1, Pt. 2, Lund.

  • Agardh JA (1852) Species genera et ordines algarum. Vol. 2, Part 2, Lund.

  • Agardh JG (1876) Species genera et ordines algarum. Vol. 3. Lipsia [Leipzig].

  • Bold HC, Wynne MJ (1978) Introduction to the algae. Structure and reproduction. Prentice-Hall, INC., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bory de Saint-Vincent JB (1803) Essai sur les iles Fortunées.

  • Cormaci M, Furnari G, Serio D (1994) Two new species of Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the Mediterranean Sea: Laurencia pelagiensis sp. nov. and Laurencia verlaquei sp. nov. Japanese Journal of Phycology 42: 365–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cribb AB (1983) Marine Algae of the Southern Great Barrier Reef-Rhodophyta. Australian Coral Reef Society, Watson Ferguson and Co., Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii MT, Cordeiro-Marino M (1996) Laurencia translucida sp. nov. (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from Brazil. Phycologia 35: 542–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii MT, Collado-Vides L, Cordeiro-Marino M (1996) Morphological studies of Laurencia gemmifera and Laurencia poiteaui (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) from the Nichupte Lagoon System, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Botanica Marina 39: 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnari G, Serio D (1993a) The distinction of Laurencia truncata (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) in the Mediterranean Sea from Laurencia pinnatifida. Phycologia 32: 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnari G, Serio D (1993b) The reproductive structures of the Mediterranean alga Laurencia pelagosae (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). European Journal of Phycology 28: 141–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnari G, Serio D, Cormaci M (2004) Revision of Laurencia pedicularioides (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Taxon 53: 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbary DJ, Harper JT (1998) A phylogenetic analysis of the Laurencia complex (Rhodomelaceae) of the red algae. Cryptogamie Algologie 19: 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelin SG (1768) Historia Fucorum. Academia Scientarum, St Petersburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon-Mills EM (1987) Morphology and taxonomy of Chondria tenuissima and Chondria dasyphylla (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) from European waters. British Journal of Phycology 22: 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon-Millis EM, Womersley HBS (1987) The genus Chondria C. Agardh (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) in southern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 35: 477–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper JT, Garbary DJ (1997) Marine algae of Northern Senegal: The flora and its biogeography. Botanica Marina 40: 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey WH (1855) Some account of the marine botany of the colony of Western Australia. Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy 22: 525–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey WH (1862) Phycologica Australica. Vol. 4, London.

  • Howe MA (1918) Class 3, Algae. In Britton NL (ed), Flora of Bermuda (Illustrated). New York: pp 489–540.

  • Howe MA (1934) Hawaiian algae collected by Dr. Paul C. Galtsoff. Journal of Washington Academic Science 24: 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson V (1778) Flora anglica. Editio altera. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kylin H (1956) Die Gattungen der Rhodophyceen. Gleerups. Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamouroux M (1805) Dissertations sur plusieurs espèces de Fucus. Agen.

  • Lamouroux JV (1813) Essai sur les genres de la famille des Thallasiophyte non articulées. Annales du Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris 20: 21–47, 115–139, 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggs CA, Hommersand MH (1993) Seaweeds of the British Isles. Volume 1. Rhodophyta, Part 3A. Ceramiales. Natural History Museum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda M, Kogame K (1998) A taxonomic study of the genus Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from Vietnam. V. Laurencia concreta Cribb and L. dinhii sp. nov. Cryptogamie Algologie 19: 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda M, Kawaguchi S, Phang SM (1997a) Taxonomic notes on Laurencia similis and L. papillosa (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the Western Pacific. Botanica Marina 40: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuda M, Kogame K, Abe Y, Kamura S (1997b) Taxonomic notes on Laurencia parvipapillata (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the western Pacific. Cryptogamie Algologie 18: 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda M, Kogame K, Abe Y, Kamura S (1998a) A morphological study of Laurencia palisada (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Botanica Marina 41: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda M, Kogame K, Arisawa S, Suzuki M (1998b) Morphology and halogenated secondary metabolites of three Gran Canarian species of Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Botanica Marina 41: 265–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermid KJ (1988) Section V. Laurencia (Rhodophyta, Rhodomelaceae). In Abbott I.A. (ed.), Taxonomy of economic seaweeds. With reference to some Pacific and Caribbean species Volume II. Publication of California Sea Grant College Program: 264 pp.

  • McDermid K (1989) Laurencia crustiformans sp. nov. (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the Hawaiian Islands. Phycologia 28: 352–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor L, Maggs CA, Guiry MD, Hommersand MH (2002) Phylogenetic analysis of the geographically disjunct genus Osmundea Stackhouse (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Constancea 83 pp.

  • Montagne C (1840) Histoire naturelle des iles Canaries. Phytographia canariensis sectio ultima.

  • Nam KW (1990) Morphotaxonomic studies of genus Laurencia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Unpublished PhD Thesis. Hokkaido University, Japan.

  • Nam KW (1994) Vegetative and male reproductive anatomy of Laurencia intercalaris sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) in Korea. Journal of Plant Biology 37: 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW (1999) Morphology of Chondrophycus undulata and C. parvipapillata and its implications for the taxonomy of the Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) complex. European Journal of Phycology 34: 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW (2004) Laurencia complex: Morphology of Laurencia pinnata (Rhodophyta), with a key to Korean species. In Abbott IA, McDermid KJ (eds), Taxonomy of economic seaweeds. Vol. 9. Taxonomy of economic seaweeds. With reference to some Pacific and other locations Volume IX. Publication of Hawaii Sea Grant College Program: 255–271

  • Nam KW, Choi HG (1999) Developmental morphology of Osmundea crispa (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from California. Journal of Fisheries Science and Technology 2: 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Choi HG (2000) A detailed morphological study of the type species of Osmundea (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Botanica Marina. 43: 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Choi HG (2001) Morphology of Laurencia clavata and L. elata (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) in relation to generic circumscription in the Laurencia complex. European Journal of Phycology 36: 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Saito Y (1990) Morphology of Laurencia cartilaginea Yamada (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University 41: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Saito Y (1991a) Anatomical characteristics of Laurencia papillosa (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) from Guam and Palau. Micronesica 24: 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Saito Y (1991b) Laurencia similis (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta), a new species from Queensland, Australia. British Phycological Journal 26: 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Saito Y (1994) A re-examination of Laurencia hybrida (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the British Isles: vegetative and reproductive morphology. Phycologia 33: 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Saito Y (1995) Vegetative and reproductive anatomy of some Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) species with a description of L. maris-rubri sp. nov. from the Red Sea. Phycologia 34: 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Sohn CH (1994) Laurencia kangjaewonii sp. nov. (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from Korea. Phycologia 33: 397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Saito Y, Sohn CH (1994) Vegetative structure and reproduction of Laurencia nipponica Yamada (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Korean Journal of Phycology 6: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Choi HG, Lee S, Park EJ, Kang KH, Kim YS (2000a) Vegetative and reproductive development of Laurencia venusta (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Cryptogamie Algologie 21: 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Maggs CA, Garbary DJ (1994) Resurrection of the genus Osmundea with an emendation of the generic delineation of Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 33: 384–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KW, Maggs CA, McIvor L, Stanhope MJ (2000b) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Osmundea (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) in Atlantic Europe. Journal of Phycology 36: 759–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y (1967) Studies on Japanese species of Laurencia, with special reference to their comparative morphology. Memoirs of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University 15: 1–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y (1969a) On morphological distinctions of some species of Pacific North American Laurencia. Phycologia 8: 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y (1969b) The algal genus Laurencia from the Hawaiian Islands, the Philippine Island and adjacent areas. Pacific Science 23: 148–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y (1982) Morphology and infrageneric position of three British species of Laurencia (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 21: 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y, Womersley HBS (1974) The Southern Australian Species of Laurencia (Ceramiales: Rhodophyta). Australian Journal of Botany 22: 815–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serio D, Cormaci M, Furnari G (1999) Osmundea maggsiana sp. nov. (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the Mediterranean Sea. Phycologia 38: 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GM, Hollenberg GJ (1943) On some Rhodophyceae from the Monterey Peninsula, California. American Journal of Botany 30: 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonder OG (1853) Plantae Muellerianae. Algae. Linnaea 25: 657–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stackhouse J (1809) Tentamen marino-cryptogamicum. Mémoires de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 2: 50–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0 beta. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng CK (1943) Marine algae of Hong Kong. IV. The genus Laurencia. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters 28: 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womersley HBS (2003) The marine benthic flora of southern Australia. Part IIID. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra and the State Herbarium of South Australia. Pirion, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne MJ, Ballantine DL (1991) Laurencia iridescens sp. nov. (Rhodomelaceae, Ceramiales) from the Caribbean Sea. Phycologia 30: 394–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada Y (1931) Notes on Laurencia, with special reference to the Japanese species. University of California Publications in Botany 16: 185–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoneshigue-Valentin Y, Fujii MT, Gurgel CFD (2003) Osmundea lata (M. Howe & W.R. Taylor) comb. nov. (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the Brazilian south-eastern continental shelf. Phycologia 42: 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. W. Nam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nam, K.W. Phylogenetic Re-Evaluation of the Laurencia Complex (Rhodophyta) with a Description of L. Succulenta Sp. Nov. from Korea. J Appl Phycol 18, 679–697 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-006-9073-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-006-9073-3

Key words

Navigation