Skip to main content
Log in

Plagiarism Intervention Using a Game-Based Tutorial in an Online Distance Education Course

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This project assesses the ability of a game tutorial, “Goblin Threat” to increase university students’ ability to recognize plagiarized passages. The game tutorial covers information about how to cite properly, types and consequences of plagiarism, and the differences between paraphrasing and plagiarism. The game involves finding and clicking on “goblins” who ask questions about various aspects of plagiarism. Sound effects and entertaining visuals work to keep students’ attention. One group of 177 students enrolled in an online Psychology of Adolescence course answered four multiple choice plagiarism recognition questions in the months after completing the online game tutorial while another group of over 400 students in the same online psychology course did not have access to the game tutorial, but answered the same multiple choice plagiarism recognition questions over the same period of time. The group who played the game tutorial showed an 11% improvement in recognizing plagiarized passages over the comparison group, a statistically significant difference. Results suggest the ability to keep students focused may be an important ingredient for plagiarism interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett, J.J. (2007). Adolescence and emerging adulthood, third edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • Bradley, E. G. (2015). Using computer simulations and games to prevent student plagiarism. Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 240–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broussard, M. J. S. (2011). Goblin threat. In T. R. McDevitt (Ed.), Let the games begin! Engaging students with field-tested interactive information literacy instruction (pp. 132–133). New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Broussard, M. J. S. (2012). Digital games in academic libraries: A review of games and suggested best practices. Reference Services Review, 40(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broussard, M. J. S. (2014). Using games to make formative assessment fun in the academic library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broussard, M. J. S. & Oberlin, J. U. (2011). Using online games to fight plagiarism: A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down. Indiana Libraries, 30(1), 28–39. Available at http://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/IndianaLibraries/article/view/1912/1823. Accessed 4 May 2014.

  • Brown, C. A., Dickson, R., Humphreys, A.-L., McQuillan, V., & Smears, E. (2008). Promoting academic writing/referencing skills: Outcome of an undergraduate e-learning pilot project. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00735.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasoma, R., Thompson, C., & Pennycook, A. (2004). Beyond plagiarism: Transgressive and nontransgressive intertextuality. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 3(3), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chankova, M. (2017) Dealing with students’ plagiarism pre-emptively through teaching proper information exploitation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11 (2), Article 4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110204.

  • Chauhan, P. K., Wood, E., Plummer, T., & Forsyth, G. (2018). Peer-based interventions on academic integrity: Assessing immediate and long term learning. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9296-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chertok, I. R. A., Barnes, E., & Gilleland, D. (2014). Academic integrity in the online learning environment for health sciences students. Nurse Education Today, 34(10), 1324–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers, C., & Bruton, S. (2016). “Should it be considered plagiarism?” student perceptions of complex citation issues. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9250-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, S., & Anyinam, C. (2012). Trialing a contextual approach to academic honesty. Nurse Educator., 37(2), 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colella-Sandercock, J. (2016). Self-reporting in plagiarism research: How honest is this approach? Journal of Research Practice, 12(2), Article V3. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/558/456. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.

  • Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59, 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes-Vera, J., Garcia, T. J., & Gutierrez, A. (2017). Knowing and improving paraphrasing skills of Mexican college students. Information and Learning Science, 118(9/10), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-05-2017-0042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J. E., Willis, R. P., & Copper, C. (1992). Effect of overlearning on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, S. E. (2017). Comparative analysis of institutional policy definitions of plagiarism: A pan-Canadian university study. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 48(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-017-9300-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elander, J., Pittamb, G., Lusherc, J., Fox, P., & Paynee, N. (2010). Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estow, S., Lawrence, E. K., & Adams, K. A. (2011). Practice makes perfect: Improving students' skills in understanding and avoiding plagiarism with a themed course. Teaching of Psychology, 38(4), 255–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germek, G. (2012). The lack of assessment in the academic library plagiarism prevention tutorial. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 19(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., Walkem, K., Smith, L. M., Shearer, T., & Stirling, C. (2014). Postgraduate nursing student knowledge, attitudes, skills, and confidence in appropriately referencing academic work. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(8), 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullifer, J. M., & Tyson, G. A. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking student’s understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1202–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckler, N. C., Forde, D. R., & Hobson Bryan, C. (2013). Using writing assignment designs to mitigate plagiarism. Teaching Sociology, 41(1), 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, E. A. (2012). Education improves plagiarism detection by biology undergraduates. BioScience, 62(6), 585–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, E. A., Fagerheim, B., & Durham, S. (2014). Online plagiarism training falls short in biology classrooms. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husain, F. M., Al-Shaibani, G. K. S., & Mahfood, O. H. A. (2017). Perceptions of and attitudes toward plagiarism and factors contributing to plagiarism: A review of studies. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15, 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9274-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, D. C. (2014). Does the online environment promote plagiarism? A comparative study of dissertations from brick-and-mortar versus online institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 272–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, D. C. (2016). Academic misconduct and the internet. In D. M. Velliaris (Ed.), Handbook of research on academic misconduct in higher education (pp. 82–111). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1610-1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, S. (2013). What students’ use of sources reveals about advanced writing skills. Across the Disciplines, 10(4). Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/jamieson.cfm. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.

  • Jocoy, C., & DiBiase, D. (2006). Plagiarism by adult learners online: A case study in detection and remediation. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashian, N., Cruz, S. M., Jang, J.-W., & Silk, K. J. (2015). Evaluation of an instructional activity to reduce plagiarism in the communication classroom. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13, 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9238-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K., Nowak, S., Raghuraman, R., Thomas, J., & Davis, S. F. (2000). Academic dishonesty and distance learning: Student and faculty views. College Student Journal, 34(2), 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreaux, M., Darnell, K., Sheehan, E., & Tusher, C. (2012). Educating students about plagiarism. Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology, 1–7.

  • Löfström, E., Huotari, E., & Kupila, P. (2017). Conceptions of plagiarism and problems in academic writing in a changing landscape of external regulation. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9285-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, M. (2013). Gaming and gamification. Public Services Quarterly, 9(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2013.815502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marusic, A., Wager, E., Utrobicic, A., Rothstein, H. R., & Sambunjak, D. (2016). Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (Issue 4), Art. No.: MR000038. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.

  • McCabe, D. L. (2009). Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: An empirical investigation. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(11), 614–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, S., & Lightbody, M. (2008). Enhancing students’ understanding of plagiarism within a discipline context. Accounting Education, 17(3), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, T. M. (2014). Combating plagiarism using a community of practice approach. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(4), 1315–1331.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, S. (2013). Stages of memory - Encoding storage and retrieval. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/memory.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.

  • Moss, S. A., White, B., & Lee, J. (2017). A systematic review into the psychological causes and correlates of plagiarism, Ethics & Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2017.1341837. Published online: 16 Jun 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, F. J., Wright, J. D., & Newton, J. D. (2014). Skills training to avoid inadvertent plagiarism: Results from a randomised control study. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(6), 1180–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.911257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, C., & White, F. A. (2013). A 5-year systematic strategy to reduce plagiarism among first-year psychology university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2009). Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 34(2), 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlen, T. P. (1983). Japan’s high schools. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.

  • Smedley, A., Crawford, T., & Cloete, L. (2015). An intervention aimed at reducing plagiarism in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 15, 168–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. G., & Cannoy, S. D. (2010). Business communication: Instructional strategies to prevent plagiarism, Business Education Forum, 23–25.

  • Stagg, A., Kimmins, L., & Pavlovski, N. (2013). Academic style with substance: A collaborative screencasting project to support referencing skills. The Electronic Library, 31(4), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2012-0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetter, M. E. (2013). Teaching students about plagiarism using a web-based module. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(5), 675–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W. & Zucho, A. (2002). Adolescence in China and Japan: Adapting to a changing environment. In B. B. Brown, R. Larson, & T. S. Saraswathi (Eds.) The world's youth: Adolescence in eight regions of the globe (pp. 141–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Stuber-McEwen, D., Wiseley, P., & Hoggatt, S. (2009). Point, click, and cheat: Frequency and type of academic dishonesty in the virtual classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, XII(III).

  • Tewell, E., & Angell, K. (2015). Far from a trivial pursuit: Assessing the effectiveness of games in information literacy instruction. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnitin (2012). White paper: The Plagiarism Spectrum, www.turnitin.com. Accessed 8 June 2012.

  • Vardi, I. (2012). Developing students’ referencing skills: A matter of plagiarism, punishment and morality or of learning to write critically? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 921–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. L. (2008). Preventing unintentional plagiarism: A method for strengthening paraphrasing skills. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(4), 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to Mary Broussard for creating “Goblin Threat” and allowing me to use it for my courses and research. I would also like to thank Lara Apps and Adrienne Munro for their research assistance. This project was partially supported by two research grants from the Academic Research Committee of my university. I would also like to thank Andrew Chiarella and Cheuk Ng for reviewing earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl A. Kier.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Quiz Questions

 

Quiz 1

Option

Read the following passage from page 13 of your textbook: “For now, however, it should be emphasized that even though there is evidence to support a modified storm and stress view, this does not mean that storm and stress is typical of all adolescents in all places and times.” Which of the following is NOT plagiarised from the above passage?

a

It should be emphasized that even though there is evidence to support a modified storm and stress view, this does not mean that storm and stress is typical of all adolescents in all places and times.

b

Many, but not all, adolescents experience some aspects of storm and stress at some point in their development.

c

For now, however, it should be emphasized that even though there is evidence to support a modified storm and stress view, this does not mean that storm and stress is typical of all adolescents in all places and times.

d

Although there is evidence to support a modified storm and stress view, this does not mean that storm and stress is typical of all adolescents in all places and times

 

Quiz 2

Option

Read the following passage from page 177 of your textbook. “Had Luther grown up in a different time and place, he would have developed a much different identity.” Which of the following does NOT constitute plagiarism of the passage?

a

According to Arnett (2007), had Luther grown up in a different time and place, he would have developed a much different identity.

b

According to Arnett (2007, p.177), “Had Luther grown up in a different time and place, he would have developed a much different identity.”

c

Had Luther grown up in a different time and place, he would have developed a much different identity.

d

All of the above are plagiarised.

 

Quiz 3

Option

Read the following passage from page 197 of your textbook. “Fathers usually reported being in a good mood during the rare times they and their adolescents were doing something together”. Which of the following does NOT constitute plagiarism of the passage?

a

During the rare times fathers and their adolescents were doing something together, fathers usually reported being in a good mood.

b

Although fathers and adolescent daughters did not spend much time together, fathers tended to enjoy the time they did share (Arnett 2007).

c

Fathers usually reported being in a good mood during the rare times they and their adolescents were doing something together (Arnett 2007).

d

None of the above constitutes plagiarism.

 

Quiz 4

Option

Read the following passage that was taken from page 325 of your textbook: “Certainly it is true that with longer school days, a longer school year, cram schools, and private tutors, Japanese adolescents have far less time for after-school leisure and informal socializing with friends than American adolescents do (Rohlen 1983; Stevenson and Zusho 2002).” Which of the following does NOT plagiarise the above passage?

a

It is true that because of longer school days, a longer school year, cram schools and private tutors, Japanese adolescents have far less time for after-school leisure and informal socializing than American adolescents do (Rohlen 1983; Stevenson and Zusho 2002).

b

Japanese adolescents have far less time for after-school leisure and informal socializing with friends than American adolescents do because of longer school days, a longer school year, cram schools, and private tutors (Rohlen 1983; Stevenson and Zusho 2002; as cited in Arnett 2007).

c

In Japan, adolescents do not have much time for extracurricular activities because they spend so much more time with schooling than American students do (Rohlen 1983; Stevenson and Zusho 2002; as cited in Arnett 2007).

d

All of the above are plagiarised.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kier, C.A. Plagiarism Intervention Using a Game-Based Tutorial in an Online Distance Education Course. J Acad Ethics 17, 429–439 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09340-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09340-6

Keywords

Navigation