Skip to main content
Log in

Turning a Blind Eye: Faculty Who Ignore Student Cheating

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, 40.3% of faculty members admitted to ignoring student cheating on one or more occasions. The quality of past experience in dealing with academic integrity violations was examined. Faculty members with previous bad experiences were more likely to prefer dealing with cheating by ignoring it. The data were further analysed to determine beliefs and attitudes that distinguish between faculty who have never ignored an instance of cheating and those who indicated that they have ignored one or more instances in the past. The stated reasons for ignoring cheating included insufficient evidence, triviality of the offense, and insufficient time; however, it was demonstrated that faculty who ignored academic integrity violations felt more stressed when speaking to students about cheating, preferred to avoid emotionally charged situations, and indicated that if a student were likely to become emotional, they were less likely to speak to him or her.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, A., & Levine, K. (2001). Surveying the social world: Principles and practice in survey research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, R., & Cox, A. L. (2005). At least they’re learning something: the hazy line between collaboration and collusion. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, E. (2002, July). Northumbria University lecturers’ experiences of plagiarism and collusion. Paper presented at the First Northumbria Conference—Educating for the Future, Newcastle on Tyne, UK.

  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dordoy, A. (2002, July). Cheating and plagiarism: Student and staff perceptions at Northumbria. Paper presented at the First Northumbria Conference—Educating for the Future, Newcastle on Tyne, UK.

  • Greene, A. S., & Saxe, L. (1992). Everyone (else) does it: Academic cheating. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association Convention, Boston, MA. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED347931)

  • Hibbert, C. (1998). Nelson: A personal history. Toronto: HarperCollins Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith-Spiegel, P., Tabachnick, B. G., Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Washburn, J. (1998). Why professors ignore cheating: opinions of a national sample of psychology instructors. Ethics and Behavior, 8(3), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainka, C., & Raeburn, S. (2006). Investigating staff perceptions of academic misconduct: First results in one school. Paper presented at the Second International Plagiarism Conference, The Sage Gateshead, UK.

  • Mangione, T. W. (1995). Mail surveys: Improving the quality. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2004a). Academic integrity: Rutgers University faculty survey. Retrieved from http://integrity.rutgersedu/rutgersfac.asp

  • McCabe, D. L. (2004b, October 9–11) Student cheating: Crisis or opportunity? Paper presented at the Center for Academic Integrity Conference, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

  • Meyer, G. D., & Bloemer, H. (2006). Plagiarism in the department of mechanical engineering in the Russ College of Engineering at Ohio University. Retrieved from http://www.ohio.edu/outlook/media/BMIR.cfm

  • Rettinger, D. A., Jordan, A. E., & Peschiera, F. (2004). Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: a vignette experiment. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 873–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, A. J. (2005). Schools for scandal. New England Review, 26(3), 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southey, R. (1908). The life of Horatio Lord Nelson. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/947.

  • Stern, E. B., & Havlicek, L. (1986). Academic misconduct: results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys. Journal of Allied Health, 5(2), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., Keith-Spiegel, P., & Pope, K. S. (1991). Ethics of teaching: beliefs and behaviours of psychologists as educators. American Psychologist, 46(5), 506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, R., Davidson, L., & Bell, M. C. (2008). Faculty attitudes and behaviors concerning student cheating. College Student Journal, 42(1), 164–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasley, P. (2006, August 11). The plagiarism hunter. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Coren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coren, A. Turning a Blind Eye: Faculty Who Ignore Student Cheating. J Acad Ethics 9, 291–305 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9147-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9147-y

Keywords

Navigation