Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring Academic Dishonesty among University Students in Barbados: An Extension to the Theory of Planned Behaviour

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper applies Beck and Ajzen’s (Journal of Research in Personality 25:285–301, 1991) extended version of the theory of planned behaviour model to the decisions of students to engage in academic dishonesty (cheating and lying). The model proposes that students’ intentions to engage in dysfunctional behaviours may be influenced by attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control and moral obligation. This study was done using a survey questionnaire of 363 undergraduate students at a West Indian University. Based on the extended version of the theory of planned behaviour, with the exception of subjective norms which only predicted students’ intentions to cheat, it was found that attitudes, perceived behavioural control and moral obligation were significant predictors of students’ intentions to perform academic dishonesty behaviours in the form of cheating and lying. The results of the study have given further support to the use of the extended version of the theory of planned behaviour. Implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We differentiate these academic behaviours based on intentional and unintentional acts. We argue that an act that has not been done intentionally should not be considered. Of course, it may be difficult to determine this; however, it is outside of the scope of this study.

  2. This current study focuses on intentions rather than actual behaviour.

  3. Readers are directed to Rest’s (1986) for a wider discussion on his four stage ethical decision-making model.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2002). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alleyne, P., Devonish, D., Nurse, J., & Cadogan-McClean, C. (2006). Perceptions of moral intensity among undergraduate accounting students in Barbados. Journal of Eastern Caribbean Studies, September, 31(3), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alleyne, P., Devonish, D., Allman, J., Charles-Soverall, W., & Young Marshall, A. (2010). Measuring ethical perceptions and intentions among undergraduate students in Barbados. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 15(2), 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2008). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (12th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J., Polimeni, R., & Slavin, N. (2007). Academic dishonesty: A crisis on campus. The CPA Journal, May LXXVII (5), http:www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2007/507/essentials/p58.htm.

  • Carpenter, T. D., & Reimers, J. L. (2005). Unethical and fraudulent financial reporting: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, K. J., Davis, R., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2004). Academic integrity in the business school environment: I’ll get by with a little help from my friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lambert, K. D., Ellen, N., & Taylor, L. (2003). Cheating—What is it and why do it: A study in New Zealand tertiary institutions of the perceptions and justifications for academic dishonesty. Journal of American Academy of Business, 3(1/2), 98–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devonish, D., Alleyne, P., Cadogan-McClean, C., & Greenidge, D. (2009). An empirical study of future professionals’ intentions to engage in unethical business practices. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(3), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emeen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (1996). Accounting students’ perceptions of questionable academic practices and factors affecting their propensity to cheat. Accounting Education, 5(3), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in academics and business: A cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., & Passow, H. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haswell, S., Jubb, P., & Wearing, B. (1999). Accounting students and cheating: A comparative study for Australia, South Africa and the UK. Teaching Business Ethics, 3, 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, R., & Eastman, J. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty: Are business students different from other college students? Journal of Education For Business, 82(2), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, R., & Eastman, J. K. (2008). The impact of unethical reasoning on academic dishonesty: Exploring the moderating effect of social desirability. Marketing Education Review, 18(2), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes and proposed actions. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. The Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006). Factors influencing engineering students’ decision to cheat vary by type of assignment. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 643–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. The Journal of Education for Business, 68, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T., Kisamore, J., & Jahawar, I. (2007). Predicting academic dishonesty: theory of planned behaviour and personality. Proceedings of the 2007 Management Education Division of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

  • Stone, T., Jahawar, I., & Kisamore, J. (2009). Using the theory of planned behaviour and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, E. A., & Storch, J. B. (2003). Academic dishonesty and attitudes towards academic dishonest acts: Support for cognitive dissonance theory. Psychological Reports, 92, 174–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. (1972). Short homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability sacle. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weygandt, J. J., Kieso, D. R., & Kimmel, P. D. (2003). Financial Accounting (4th ed.). USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A Review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Keith-Speigel, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator’s guide. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., Nelson, A. B., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 41(9/10), 657–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philmore Alleyne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alleyne, P., Phillips, K. Exploring Academic Dishonesty among University Students in Barbados: An Extension to the Theory of Planned Behaviour. J Acad Ethics 9, 323–338 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9144-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9144-1

Keywords

Navigation