Abstract
Using patients as teaching tools raise many ethical issues like informed consent, privacy, confidentiality and beneficence. The current study highlights issues on respecting patient’s choice and acquiring informed consent with its spirit rather than as mere formality. The study was conducted in out-patient department of The Kidney Center Postgraduate Training Institute Karachi Pakistan in May 2008 to July 2008. All patients who had come for the first time to see the author were included in the study. The said study explored the willingness of patients to allow medical students to be present during history taking and physical examination by the consultant. There were 18 male and 03 female patients. Age ranging from 22 to 73 years with mean age of 53.5 ± 13.7 years. There were total of 21 patient–students encounters out of which two encounters were with male students only and two with female students only. So in 17 Patient–students encounters, students of both genders were present. All patients permitted history taking in the presence of medical students except one who had a history of extramarital sexual contact and signs and symptoms suggestive of sexually transmitted disease. Of the male patients 50% (9/18) did not allow intimate examination before medical students. Out of these nine patients who refused, four consented earlier but when enquired again about their true willingness, they expressed their preference not to have medical students in the room while undergoing digital rectal and external genital examinations. Physicians need to develop sensitivity to acquire informed consent in its true essence rather than just as a formality by exploring actual willingness of the patient. One should refrain from being judgmental on the basis of gender, looks, religion or norms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amir, M., Rabbani, M. Z., & Parvez, M. B. (2009). Informed consent in elective surgical procedures: “what do the patients think?”. JPMA, 59(10), 679–682.
Annas, G. J. (1980). The care of private patients in teaching hospitals: legal implications. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 56, 403–411.
Bendapudi, N. M., Berry, L. L., Frey, K. A., Parish, J. T., & Rayburn, W. L. (2006). Patient’s perspectives on ideal physician behaviours— Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81(3), 338–344. http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/81/3/338.full.
Boyle, R. J. (2005). The process of informed consent. In Fletcher’s introduction to clinical ethics (3rd ed., pp. 139–156). Maryland: Hagerstown.
Gordon, L. A. (1994). An inquiry into surgical academia. In L. A. Gordon (Ed.), Gordon’s guide to the surgical morbidity and mortality conference (pp. 85–87). Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus.
Gostin, L. O. (1995). Informed consent, cultural sensitivity and respect for persons. JAMA, 245, 844–845.
Jafarey, A. (2006). Informed consent: views from Karachi. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 12, S50–S55. Supplement 1.
Knapp, M. B. (1983). Legal implications of clinical supervision of medical students and residents. Journal of Medical Education, 58, 293–299.
Matiti, M. R., & Trorey, G. (2004). Perceptual adjustment levels: patients’ perspective of their dignity in the hospital setting. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 735–744.
Moazam, F., & Zaman, R. M. (2003). The role of the ethics consultant at the interface of cultures. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 14(4), 246–258.
Moazm, F. (2000). Families, patients, and physicians in medical decision making: A Pakistani perspective. Hastings Center Report, 30, 28–37.
O’Flynn, N., Spencer, J., & Jones, R. (1997). Consent and confidentiality in teaching in general practice: survey of patients’ views on presence of students. BMJ, 315, 1142.
Shooner, C. (1997). The ethics of learning from patients. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 156(4), 535–538.
Siegel, J. H. (1980). Surgical training, quality surgical care and informed consent. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 56, 433–452.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahmud, S.M., Ahmad, A. Patients as Teaching Tools: Merely Informed or True Consent. J Acad Ethics 7, 255–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9099-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9099-7