Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patients as Teaching Tools: Merely Informed or True Consent

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using patients as teaching tools raise many ethical issues like informed consent, privacy, confidentiality and beneficence. The current study highlights issues on respecting patient’s choice and acquiring informed consent with its spirit rather than as mere formality. The study was conducted in out-patient department of The Kidney Center Postgraduate Training Institute Karachi Pakistan in May 2008 to July 2008. All patients who had come for the first time to see the author were included in the study. The said study explored the willingness of patients to allow medical students to be present during history taking and physical examination by the consultant. There were 18 male and 03 female patients. Age ranging from 22 to 73 years with mean age of 53.5 ± 13.7 years. There were total of 21 patient–students encounters out of which two encounters were with male students only and two with female students only. So in 17 Patient–students encounters, students of both genders were present. All patients permitted history taking in the presence of medical students except one who had a history of extramarital sexual contact and signs and symptoms suggestive of sexually transmitted disease. Of the male patients 50% (9/18) did not allow intimate examination before medical students. Out of these nine patients who refused, four consented earlier but when enquired again about their true willingness, they expressed their preference not to have medical students in the room while undergoing digital rectal and external genital examinations. Physicians need to develop sensitivity to acquire informed consent in its true essence rather than just as a formality by exploring actual willingness of the patient. One should refrain from being judgmental on the basis of gender, looks, religion or norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amir, M., Rabbani, M. Z., & Parvez, M. B. (2009). Informed consent in elective surgical procedures: “what do the patients think?”. JPMA, 59(10), 679–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, G. J. (1980). The care of private patients in teaching hospitals: legal implications. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 56, 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N. M., Berry, L. L., Frey, K. A., Parish, J. T., & Rayburn, W. L. (2006). Patient’s perspectives on ideal physician behaviours— Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81(3), 338–344. http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/81/3/338.full.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, R. J. (2005). The process of informed consent. In Fletcher’s introduction to clinical ethics (3rd ed., pp. 139–156). Maryland: Hagerstown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. A. (1994). An inquiry into surgical academia. In L. A. Gordon (Ed.), Gordon’s guide to the surgical morbidity and mortality conference (pp. 85–87). Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. O. (1995). Informed consent, cultural sensitivity and respect for persons. JAMA, 245, 844–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarey, A. (2006). Informed consent: views from Karachi. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 12, S50–S55. Supplement 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. B. (1983). Legal implications of clinical supervision of medical students and residents. Journal of Medical Education, 58, 293–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matiti, M. R., & Trorey, G. (2004). Perceptual adjustment levels: patients’ perspective of their dignity in the hospital setting. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 735–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moazam, F., & Zaman, R. M. (2003). The role of the ethics consultant at the interface of cultures. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 14(4), 246–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moazm, F. (2000). Families, patients, and physicians in medical decision making: A Pakistani perspective. Hastings Center Report, 30, 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn, N., Spencer, J., & Jones, R. (1997). Consent and confidentiality in teaching in general practice: survey of patients’ views on presence of students. BMJ, 315, 1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shooner, C. (1997). The ethics of learning from patients. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 156(4), 535–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. H. (1980). Surgical training, quality surgical care and informed consent. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 56, 433–452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Mamun Mahmud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahmud, S.M., Ahmad, A. Patients as Teaching Tools: Merely Informed or True Consent. J Acad Ethics 7, 255–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9099-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9099-7

Keywords

Navigation