Skip to main content
Log in

Being, Doing, and Knowing: Developing Ethical Competence in Health Care

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a growing interest in ethical competence-building within nursing and health care practising. This tendency is accompanied by a remarkable growth of ethical guidelines. Ethical demands have also been laid down in laws. Present-day practitioners and researchers in health care are thereby left in a virtual cross-fire of various legislations, codes, and recommendations, all intended to guide behaviour. The aim of this paper was to investigate the role of ethical guidelines in the process of ethical competence-building within health care practice and medical research. A conceptual and critical philosophical analysis of some paragraphs of the Helsinki Declaration and of relevant literature was performed. Three major problems related to ethical guidelines were identified, namely, the interpretation problem (there is always a gap between the rule and the practice, which implies that ethical competence is needed for those who are to implement the guidelines); the multiplicity problem (the great number of codes, declarations, and laws might pull in different directions, which may confuse the health care providers who are to follow them); and the legalisation problem (ethics concerns may take on a legal form, where ethical reflection is replaced by a procedure of legal interpretations). Virtue ethics might be an alternative to a rule based approach. This position, however, can turn ethics into a tacit knowledge, leading to poorly reflected and inconsistent ethical decisions. Ethical competence must consist of both being (virtues) and doing (rules and principles), but also of knowing (critical reflection), and therefore a communicative based model is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, R. (Ed.) (1993). Codification of medical morality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley, A. M. (2005). Practising virtue: A challenge to the view that a virtue centred approach to ethics lacks practical content. Nursing Ethics, 12(6), 622–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluhm, J., & Summers, C. (1992). The influence of the Canadian code of ethics for psychologists on ethical decision-making. Canadian Psychology, 33(2a), 494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosek, M. S. (2002). Effective communication skills: The key to preventing and resolving ethical situations. JONAS Health Care Law and Ethics Regulation, 4, 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. A. (1999). Proposed revisions to the declaration of Helsinki: Will they weaken the ethical principles underlying human research? New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 527–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B. A. (1999). The ethics of biomedical research: An international perspective. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, M. E. (1996). Virtue ethics for nurses in health care. Journal of Nursing Law, 4(1), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, L., & Baldwin, S. (1997). Ethical policy guidelines development for general hospital nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 34(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2002) Profession, code, and ethics. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, S. (2003) Mapping the debate on informed consent. In M. G. Hansson & M. Levine (Eds.), Biobanks as resources for health (pp. 165–196). Uppsala: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterhuizen, P. (1996). Is the professional code still the cornerstone of clinical nursing practice? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(1), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, K. (2004). Codes of conduct. Standards for ethics in research. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. C., & Wertz, D. C. (1999). The case for proposed international guidelines on ethical issues in medical genetics. In I. Nippert, H. Neitzel, & G. Wolff (Eds.), The new genetics: From research into health care. Social and ethical implications for users and providers (pp. 107–112). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, H. P. (2001). The 2000 revision of the declaration of Helsinki: A step forward or more confusion? The Lancet, 358, 1449–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, P. A. (2003). A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(5), 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatter, R. (1997). Communicative ethics for bioethics. Bioethics Examiner, 1(3), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, M. G. (2002). Imaginative ethics: Bringing ethical praxis into sharper relief. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 5, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbig, B., Bussing, A., & Ewert, T. (2001). The role of tacit knowledge in the work context of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(5), 687–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, D. (2004). Varför etiska kommittéer? (Why ethical committees?) Dissertation, Lund University.

  • Höglund, A. T. (2005). Inga lätta val. Om riktlinjer och etisk kompetens vid prioriteringar i vården. En studie i empirisk etik. (No easy choices. On guidelines and ethical competence in priority setting in health care. A study in empirical ethics). Uppsala Studies in Faiths and Ideologies, 15. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

  • International Bioethics Committee (2002). Preliminary report on the possibility of elaborating a universal instrument on bioethics. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M., & Fernell, E. (2006). Professor Gillberg och hans medarbetare måste få upprättelse. (Professor Gillberg and his co-workers must obtain redress). Läkartidningen, 103(17), 1341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jormsri, P., Kunaviktikul, W., Ketefian, S., & Chaowalit, A. (2005). Moral competence in nursing practice. Nursing Ethics, 12(6), 582–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassirer, J. P. (2001). Pseudoaccountability. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134, 587–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kälvemark, S., Höglund, A. T., Hansson, M. G., Westerholm, P., & Arnetz, B. (2004). Living with conflicts: Ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1075–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, K. (2006). A defence of unqualified medical confidentiality. American Journal of Bioethics, 6, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurie, G. (2002). Genetic privacy: A challenge to medico-legal norms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. J. (1999). The need to revise the Declaration of Helsinki. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 531–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meulenbergs, T., Verpeet, E., Schotsmans, P., & Gastmans, C. (2004). Professional codes in a changing nursing context: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(3), 331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J., & Cocking, D. (2001). Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, R. D. (2000). The ethics of professional practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, S. (2001). Are nursing codes of practice ethical? Nursing Ethics, 8(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. (2002). Professionalism, profession and the virtues of the good physician. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 69, 378–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, B. (1994). Forskning och etiska koder: En introduktion till forskningsetik. (Research and ethical codes: An introduction to research ethics). Nora: Nya Doxa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1983). Documents of life. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnick, A. (2002). The ground of dialogical bioethics. Health Care Analysis, 10(4), 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B., & Jones, M. (2002). Regulating human genetics: The changing politics of biotechnology governance in the European union. Health, Risk & Society, 4, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, C. (1997). Developing and maintaining ethical competence. HEC Forum, 9, 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silfverberg, G. (1999). Praktisk klokhet. (Practical wisdom). Stockholm: Symposion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F. E. (2002). Moving from codes of ethics to ethical relationships for midwifery practice. Nursing Ethics, 9, 522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, R. (1998). The ethics of care: A feminist virtue ethics of care for health care practioners. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 23(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tröhler, U. (2002). Human research: From ethos to law, from national to international regulations. In A.-H. Maehle, & J. Geyer-Kordesh (Eds.), Historical and philosophical perspectives on biomedical ethics. From paternalism to autonomy? (pp. 95–117). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Luk, W., Arthur, D., & Wong, T. (2001). Nursing competencies: Personal characteristics contributing to effective nursing performance. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(4), 467–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • The Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. WMA General Assembly, 2004.

  • Swedish Act on Ethical Review (2003:460).

  • Swedish Biobanks Act (2002:297).

  • Swedish Secrecy Act (1980:100).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. T. Höglund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eriksson, S., Helgesson, G. & Höglund, A.T. Being, Doing, and Knowing: Developing Ethical Competence in Health Care. J Acad Ethics 5, 207–216 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9029-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-007-9029-5

Key words

Navigation