Skip to main content
Log in

Brief Report: Examining Test-Retest Reliability of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) Calibrated Severity Scores (CSS)

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Describing the relative severity and change in autism symptoms is crucial for the appropriate characterization of clinical and research populations. The calibrated severity score (CSS) of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 (ADOS-2; Lord et al., 2012) was created to better describe autism symptom severity consistently across different ages and language levels. The CSS has been widely used to quantify and compare symptom severity on a 10-point scale across Modules; however, its test re-test reliability has not been studied. With 608 ADOS observations, we showed strong test re-test reliability of the CSS across all ADOS Modules. The results support the use of the ADOS CSS as a reliable tool to quantify autism symptom severity across development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the children, adults, and families who participated in the study. The authors also thank Shanping Qiu, MA, of Weill Cornell Medicine, for her help with analyses and data management. The authors would like to acknowledge the research participation of the families who contributed their time to this research project

Funding

This study was funded by NIMH (1R01MH114925-01 awarded to S.H.K.; R01MH066496 awarded to C.L.,) and NICHD (5R01HD081199-06 awarded to C.L.). Findings from this publication were presented in a poster symposium at the International Society for Autism Research in May of 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data were performed by CL and SHK. Data analyses were carried out by SHK, YBC, DJ and CK. All authors drafted, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to So Hyun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Lord has received royalties from Western Psychological Services for publication of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Dr. Kim and Mss. Klein, Choi and Janvier report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of respective institutional research committees. The Human Investigation Committee (IRB) of University of Michigan and Weill Cornell Medical College approved this study.

Consent to Participate

Participants whose data was included in this study consented to the inclusion of their data in our research repository for retrospective chat review. This project was approved by both IRB Committees at the University of Michigan and Weill Cornell Medical College.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janvier, D., Choi, Y.B., Klein, C. et al. Brief Report: Examining Test-Retest Reliability of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) Calibrated Severity Scores (CSS). J Autism Dev Disord 52, 1388–1394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04952-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04952-7

Keywords

Navigation