Skip to main content
Log in

An In-Depth Analysis of Expository Writing in Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using detailed linguistic analysis, this study examined the expository writing abilities of school-age children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in comparison to neurotypical (NT) children. Associations between executive functioning (EF) and writing ability in children with and without ASD were also explored. Compared to NT peers, children with ASD wrote shorter expository texts that contained more grammatical errors, and needed more assistance from the experimenter to complete the writing assessment. However, the texts of children with and without ASD did not differ in their lexical diversity, use of writing conventions, and overall quality. Analyses also revealed that greater EF was associated with better writing outcomes in both groups. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asaro-Saddler, K. (2016). Evidence-based practices and writing instruction for children with autism spectrum disorder. Preventing School Failure, 60, 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7750(00)80010-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35, 735–771. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908008787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W. (2015). Interdisciplinary frameworks for schools: Best professional practices for serving the needs of all students. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Cook, C. R., & Nagy, W. (2017). Relationships of attention and executive functions to oral language, reading, and writing skills and systems in middle childhood and early adolescence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415617167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, C., & Oehler, K. (2013). “I hate to write!”: Tips for helping students with autism spectrum and related disorders increase achievement, meet academic standards, and become happy, successful writers. Shawnee Mission, KS: AAPC Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. M. (2013). Academic achievement of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder with in-depth focus on written expression (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.

  • Brown, H. M., Johnson, A. M., Smyth, R., & Oram Cardy, J. (2014). Exploring the persuasive writing skills of students with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1482–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.07.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. M., & Klein, P. D. (2011). Writing, Asperger syndrome, and theory of mind. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1464–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1168-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, T. P. (2014). Test review: Social responsiveness scale, second edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913517525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, A. B., Smith Myles, B., Rogers, J., & Szakacs, W. (2016). Supporting the writing skills of individuals with autism spectrum disorder through assistive technologies. In T. A. Cardon (Ed.), Technology and the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder (pp. 59–74). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • College Entrance Examination Board. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work… or a ticket out. National commission on writing for America’s families, schools, and colleges (pp. 1–40). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. P. (2012). Social Responsiveness Scale (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2010). The corpus of contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25, 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, E. A., Lampit, A., Quintana, D. S., Naismith, S. L., Song, Y. J. C., Pye, J. E., et al. (2018). Autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis of executive function. Molecular Psychiatry, 23, 1198–1204. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockrell, J. E., Ricketts, J., Charman, T., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Exploring writing products in students with language impairments and autism spectrum disorders. Learning and Instruction, 32, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigsti, I. M., de Marchena, A. B., Schuh, J. M., & Kelley, E. (2011). Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: A developmental review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2015). Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1993). Self-regulated strategy development: Helping students with learning problems develop as writers. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/461758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2004). Writing instruction. In B. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 281–313). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Olinghouse, N. (2007). Addressing executive function problems in writing. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (pp. 216–236). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. E., & McLaren, J. A. (1991). Motivational factors and writing: The role of topic interestingness. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 6, 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (Research Report No. 3). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

  • Kenworthy, L., Yerys, B. E., Anthony, L. G., & Wallace, G. L. (2008). Understanding executive control in autism spectrum disorders in the lab and in the real world. Neuropsychological Review, 18, 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-008-9077-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kongs, S. K., Thompson, L. L., Iverson, G. L., & Heaton, R. K. (2000). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test—64 Card Version. Lutz, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushki, A., Chau, T., & Anagnostou, E. (2011). Handwriting difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorders: A scoping review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1706–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1206-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A., & Perry, A. (2011). Outcomes in adolescents and adults with autism: A review of the literature. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.01.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundine, J. P., & McCauley, R. J. (2016). A tutorial on expository discourse: Structure, development, and disorders in children and adolescents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25, 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magnifico, A. M. (2010). Writing for whom? Cognition, motivation, and a writer’s audience. Educational Psychologist, 45, 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.493470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2006). Frequency of reading, math, and writing disabilities in children with clinical disorders. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2008). WISC-IV and WIAT-II profiles in children with high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0410-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2018). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), Research Version. Middleton, WI: SALT Software LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A. (2016). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults (4th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., & Ward-Lonergan, J. M. (2010). Argumentative writing in pre-adolescents: The role of verbal reasoning. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 26, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659009349979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olinghouse, N. G., Graham, S., & Gillespie, A. (2015). The relationship of discourse and topic knowledge to fifth graders’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, R. C., & Delano, M. E. (2012). Writing instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612451318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapin, I., & Dunn, M. (2003). Update on the language disorders of individuals on the autism spectrum. Brain Development, 25, 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J. S., Polse, L., & Lai, J. (2017). Written narratives in children with autism. In E. Segers & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Developmental perspectives in written language and literacy (pp. 379–398). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saddler, B. (2012). Teacher’s guide to effective sentence writing. What works for special-needs learners series. New York: Guilford Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Van Bourgondien, M. E., Wellman, G. J., & Love, S. R. (2010). Childhood Autism Rating Scale (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. M. (2010). Assessing expository texts produced by school-age children and adolescents. In M. A. Nippold & C. M. Scott (Eds.), Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults (pp. 191–213). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. M., & Windsor, J. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written narrative and expository discourse of school-age children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivertson, K. (2010). Stories from the spectrum: How special interest areas affect writing quality for students with autism spectrum disorders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Duluth, Minnesota: University of Minnesota-Duluth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H., Edelson, L., & Luyster, R. (2011). Language and communication in autism spectrum disorders. In D. Amaral, D. Geschwind, & G. Dawson (Eds.), Autism spectrum disorders (pp. 172–185). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volden, J., & Lord, C. (1991). Neologisms and idiosyncratic language in autistic speakers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., Semel, E., & Secord, W. A. (2013). Children’s evaluation of language fundamentals (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajic, M. C., McIntyre, N., Swain-Lerro, L., Novotny, S., Oswald, T., & Mundy, P. (2018). Attention and written expression in school-age, high-functioning children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 22, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316675121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the Arthur J. Schmitt Foundation (Dissertation Fellowship in Leadership and Service, E. Hilvert, PI). Additional funding was provided by the NICHD (T32 HD07489, S. Hartley, PI). We would like to thank all the children, families, and staff at the schools who participated in this research study. We would also like to thank Drs. Perla Gámez and Molly Losh for their input on the study design. Special thanks to Peyton Holleran for her help with transcription and coding. Portions of this research were presented at the annual meeting for the International Society for Autism Research, Rotterdam, Netherlands. This data was collected as part of the first author’s doctoral dissertation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EH conceived of the study design, coordinated the study, performed measurement, and drafted the manuscript; DD participated in the design and interpretation of the data, and helped to draft and revise the manuscript; CMS provided input on study design and interpretation of the data, and helped to draft and revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Hilvert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the host institution and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hilvert, E., Davidson, D. & Scott, C.M. An In-Depth Analysis of Expository Writing in Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 49, 3412–3425 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04057-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04057-2

Keywords

Navigation