Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Singapore

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our study examines the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual—Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual—Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) when applied concurrently against the best estimate clinical diagnoses for 110 children (5.1–19.6 years old) referred for diagnostic assessments of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in a Singaporean outpatient speciality clinic. DSM-IV-TR performed slightly better, yielding sensitivity of 0.946 and specificity of 0.889, compared to DSM-5 (sensitivity = 0.837; specificity = 0.833). When considering the ASD sub-categories, sensitivity ranged from 0.667 to 0.933, and specificity ranged from 0.900 to 0.975. More participants with a PDD-NOS best estimate clinical diagnosis (40%) were misclassified on DSM-5. Merits and weaknesses to both classification systems, and implications for access to services and policy changes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sensitivity = true positive ÷ (true positive + false negative).Specificity = true negative ÷ (true negative + false positive).Precision/positive predictive value = true positive ÷ (true positive + false positive).Accuracy = (true positive + true negative) ÷ (true positive + false positive + false negative + true negative).

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the clinical team at IMH Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry for their participation and clinical input. They include but are not limited to Dr. Chin Chee Hon, Dr. Lim Choon Guan, Ms. Kheng Joo Lian, Ms. Pearl Lock Shern Xi, Mr. Oon Jit Hui, Ms. Magdalene Foo Tze Suang, Ms. Cindy Kua Shu Mei, Mr. Soh Wei Jie, and Ms. Jade Jang Leong Yeok. We would also like to express our thanks to the medical students, Ms. Hui Tian Yi and Ms. Lim Ee Wen, who helped to tabulate the data for the blind review in the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MS conceived of the study and facilitated its coordination; TJG designed the study, oversaw its execution, and conducted the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data; BLJT and JSC both assisted in the data processing and analysis. LHSA facilitated its execution and provided advice to the clinical team. All authors participated in drafting, reading, and approval of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Sung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sung, M., Goh, T.J., Tan, B.L.J. et al. Comparison of DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Singapore. J Autism Dev Disord 48, 3273–3281 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3594-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3594-x

Keywords

Navigation