Abstract
In this discourse analytic study, we examine interactions between adolescents with autism spectrum condition (ASC) and their typically developing (TD) peers during the construction of fictional narratives within a group intervention context. We found participants with ASC contributed fewer narrative-related turns at talk than TD participants. The groups organized the activity as a means to subvert moral and social norms, and youth with ASC participated in negotiating new norms with varying degrees of success. Further, participants with ASC often prioritized making explicit links between narrative events over creative interpretations of narrative, which illustrated differing orientations to the narrative project. Our findings add an interactional dimension to existing research focusing on the psychological aspects of narrative production in individuals with ASC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We use the term ‘condition’ instead of ‘disorder’, as it represents a neutral stance on the diagnosis. See Baron-Cohen et al. (2009) for a discussion of terminology.
Interestingly, Jessy Park’s work is so detail-focused that it does not include a ‘vantage point’; each square is considered without relation to the work as a whole or the perspective of the observer, leaving her paintings with a two-dimensional feel.
It is interesting to note, but beyond the scope of this paper to analyze in great detail, that Nathan links his contribution to the prior utterance with the preface ‘and’, instead of with ‘by’. His utterance provides a mechanism by which the children are blinded (i.e., by forcing them to look directly into the sun), which is causally prior to the previous utterance, rather than the subsequent event. Prior research has shown that individuals with ASC are less likely to provide causal statements (Tager-Flusberg 1995), so it is noteworthy that Nathan provides a causal statement masked by his use of the connector ‘and’ as a next-event statement.
An appeal to logical consistency and linearity, further described in the next section.
References
Arnold, J. E., Bennetto, L., & Diehl, J. J. (2009). Reference production in young speakers with and without autism: Effects of discourse status and processing constraints. Cognition, 110, 131–146.
Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson, M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Barnes, J. L., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Language in autism: Pragmatics and theory of mind. In J. Guidouzi, F. Loncke, & M. J. Williams (Eds.), The handbook of psycholinguistic and cognitive processes: Perspectives in communication disorders (pp. 731–745). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Barnes, J. L., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). The big picture: Storytelling ability in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1557–1565.
Baron-Cohen, S., Scott, F. J., Allison, C., Williams, J., Bolton, P., Matthews, F. E., et al. (2009). Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 500–509.
Bottema-Beutel, K., Louick, R., & White, R. (in press). Repetition, response mobilization, and face: Analysis of group interactions with a 19-year-old with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Communication Disorders.
Bottema-Beutel, K., Mullins, T. S., Harvey, M. N., Gustafson, J. R., & Carter, E. W. (2015). Avoiding the “brick wall of awkward”: Perspectives of youth with autism spectrum disorder on social-focused intervention practices. Autism.
Bottema-Beutel, K., & Smith, N. (2013). The interactional construction of identity: An adolescent with autism in interaction with peers. Linguistics and Education, 24, 197–214.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21.
Bruner, J., & Feldman, C. F. (1993). Theories of mind and the problem of autism. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2008). Finding identity: Theory and data. Multilingua, 27, 151–163.
Capps, L., Losh, M., & Thurber, C. (2000). “The frog ate the bug and made his mouth sad”: Narrative competence in children with autism. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28(2), 193–204.
Colle, L., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2008). Narrative discourse in adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 28–40.
Craig, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Creativity and imagination in autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(4), 319–326.
Dean, M., Adams, G. F., & Kasari, C. (2013). How narrative difficulties build peer rejection: A discourse analysis of a girl with autism and her female peers. Discourse Studies, 15(2), 147–166.
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York, NY: Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goldman, S. (2008). Brief report: Narratives of personal events in children with autism and developmental language disorders: Unshared memories. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1982–1988.
Goodwin, A., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. R. (2012). Comprehension of wh-questions precedes their production in typical development and autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 5, 109–123.
Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5–25.
Jarrold, C. (2003). A review of research into pretend play and autism. Autism, 7(4), 379–390.
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., & Volkmar, F. (2003). The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philosophical Transcripts from the Royal Society of London B, 358, 345–360.
Losh, M., & Capps, L. (2003). Narrative ability in high-functioning children with autism or Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(3), 239–251.
Losh, M., & Gordon, P. C. (2014). Quantifying narrative ability in autism spectrum disorder: A computational linguistic analysis of narrative coherence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 3016–3025.
Loveland, K.A., McEvoy, R.E., Tunali, B., & Kellye, M.L. (1990). Narrative story telling in autism and Down's syndrome. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 9–23.
Nicolopoulou, A., & Richner, E. S. (2004). ‘When your powers combine, I am Captain Planet’: The developmental significance of individual- and group-authored stories by preschoolers. Discourse Studies, 6(3), 347–371.
Nicolopoulou, A., & Richner, E. S. (2007). From actors to agents to persons: The development of character representation in young children’s narratives. Child Development, 78(2), 412–429.
Nicolopoulou, A., & Weintraub, J. (1998). Individual and collective representations in social context: A modest contribution to resuming the interrupted project of a sociocultural developmental psychology. Human Development, 41, 215–235
Norbury, C., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Narrative skills of children with communication impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 3, 287–313.
Ochs, E. (2004). Narrative lessons. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 269–289). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T., Sirota, K. G., & Solomon, O. (2004). Autism and social world: An anthropological perspective. Discourse Studies, 6, 147–183.
Ochs, E., & Solomon, O. (2004). Introduction: Discourse and autism. Discourse Studies, 6, 139–146.
Paul, R., Orlovski, S. M., Marcinko, H. C., & Volkmar, F. (2009). Conversational behaviors in youth with high-functioning ASD and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 115–125.
Preece, A. (1992). Collaborators and critics: The nature and effects of peer interaction on children’s conversational narratives. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 2, 277–292.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Siller, M., Swanson, M. R., Serlin, G., & Teachworth, A. G. (2014). Internal state language in the storybook narratives of children with and without autism spectrum disorder: Investigating relations to theory of mind abilities. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 589–596.
Simmons, E. S., Paul, R., & Volkmar, F. (2014). Assessing pragmatic language in autism spectrum disorder: The Yale in vivo pragmatic protocol. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 2162–2173.
Solomon, O. (2004). Narrative introductions: Discourse competence of children with autism spectrum disorders. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 253–276.
Sterponi, L. (2004). Construction of rules, accountability and moral identity by high-functioning children with autism. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 207–228.
Sterponi, L., de Kirby, K., & Shankey, J. (2014). Rethinking language in autism. Autism, advance online publication.
Sterponi, L., & Fasulo, A. (2010). “How to go on”: Intersubjectivity and progressivity in the communication of a child with autism. Ethos, 38, 116–142.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1995). ‘Once upon a rabbit’: Stories narrated by autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 45–59.
Tappan, M. B. (1991). Narrative, authorship, and the development of moral authority. New Directions for Child Development, 54, 5–25.
Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolfberg, P., DeWitt, M., Young, G. S., & Nguyen, T. (2015). Integrated play groups: Promoting symbolic play and social engagement with typical peers in children with ASC across settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(3), 830–845.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Melanie Berry, Olivia Flint, Jennifer Selke, Angela Yen, and the adolescents who participated in this social group intervention. We would also like to thank Rebecca Louick and Caitlin Malloy for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. The first author received partial funding from OSEP Grant# H325D060036.
Author contribution
KB-B designed and directed this study and drafted the manuscript; RW participated in the conceptual framing of the study, data analysis, and revision of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Transcription Conventions (Adapted from Atkinson and Heritage 1984)
Appendix: Transcription Conventions (Adapted from Atkinson and Heritage 1984)
. | Period indicates a falling, or final, intonation contour, not necessarily the end of a sentence |
? | Question mark indicates rising intonation, not necessarily a question |
, | Comma indicates ‘‘continuing’’ intonation, not necessarily a clause boundary |
↑↓ | Upward and downward pointing arrows indicate marked rising and falling shifts in intonation |
::: | Colons indicate stretching of the preceding sound, proportional to the number of colons |
- | A hyphen after a word or a part of a word indicates a cut-off or self-interruption |
word | Underlining indicates some form of stress or emphasis on the underlined item |
WOrd | Upper case indicates loudness. |
°word° | Degree signs enclose whispered speech |
= | Equal sign indicate no break or delay between the words thereby connected |
<word> | Speeding up |
>word< | Slowing down |
(()) | Double parentheses enclose descriptions of conduct |
(word) | When all or part of an utterance is in parentheses, this indicates uncertainty on the transcriber’s part |
() | Empty parentheses indicate that something is being said, but no hearing can be achieved |
(1.2) | Numbers in parentheses indicate silence in tenths of a second |
(.) | A dot in parentheses indicated a ‘‘micropause,’’ hearable but not readily measurable; ordinarily less than 2/10 of a second |
[ | Separate left square brackets, one above the other on two successive lines with utterances by different speakers, indicates a point of overlap onset |
] | Separate right square brackets, one above the other on two successive lines with utterances by different speakers, indicates a point of overlap ending |
(…) | Indicates that several turns have elapsed |
→ | Indicates a transcript segment that is highlighted in the text |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bottema-Beutel, K., White, R. By the Book: An Analysis of Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Condition Co-constructing Fictional Narratives with Peers. J Autism Dev Disord 46, 361–377 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2524-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2524-4