Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Choice on Social Outcomes of Adults with ASD

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores social outcomes for adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in comparison to adults with developmental disabilities other than ASD by investigating the relationships between the constructs Social Participation and Relationships, Social Determination, and Personal Control. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test a model of the relationships among constructs of interest and structured means analysis was used to test for mean group differences on these constructs. Results indicated that individuals with ASD had lower levels of Social Determination and Friendships than individuals with other developmental disabilities. SEM analyses yielded significant relationships between constructs. Results provide insight with regards to novel statistical, theoretical, and practical approaches to the study of social outcomes for individuals with ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Statistics regarding assumption testing can be made available by the author upon request.

  2. This was a post hoc analysis conducted to address the research question with regards to group differences in social relationships between individuals with ASD and individuals with DD other than ASD. Due to the nature of the derived measurement model, this research question could not be adequately addressed without some temporary adjustment to the model to create a latent variable more directly related to social relationships than “Social Participation and Relationships”.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5h ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billstedt, E., Gillberg, I. C., & Gillberg, C. (2005). Autism after adolescence: Population-based 13- to 22-year follow-up study of 120 individuals with autism diagnosed in childhood. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(3), 351–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Billstedt, E., Gillberg, I. C., & Gillberg, C. (2011). Aspects of quality of life in adults diagnosed with autism in childhood: A population-based study. Autism, 15(1), 7–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., & Faw, G. (2002). Residential preferences in person-centered planning. In S. Holburn & P. M. Vietze (Eds.), Person-centered planning: Research, practice and future directions (pp. 203–221). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, D. M. (2006). Comparing groups on latent variables: A structural equation modeling approach. Work, 26(4), 429–436.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. C., & Ho, H. H. (2008). Young adult outcomes of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 739–747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engstrom, I., Ekstrom, L., & Emilsson, B. (2003). Psychosocial functioning in a group of Swedish adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Autism, 7(1), 99–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Johnston, R. A. (2008). Nonnormality of data in structural equation models. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2082, 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, T., Miller, A. B., & Hsieh, K. (2002). Eight-year follow-up of the impact of environmental characteristics on well-being of adults with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 40(5), 366–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P. (2003). Outcomes in high-functioning adults with autism with and without early language delays: Implications for the differentiation between autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 3–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P. (2005). Outcomes in autism spectrum disorders. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders, Vol. 1: Diagnosis, Development, Neurobiology (3rd ed., pp. 201–220). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P., Goode, S., Hutton, J., & Rutter, M. (2004). Adult outcome for children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 212–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P., Mawhood, L. M., & Rutter, M. (2000). Autism and developmental receptive language disorder: A follow-up comparison in early adult life: II. Social, behavioural and psychiatric outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 561–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P. A., & Yates, P. (1999). The potential effectiveness of social skills groups for adults with autism. Autism: The International Journal of Research & Practice, 3(3), 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Services Research Institute & National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services. (2011). National core indicators adult consumer survey 2009–2010 final report. Cambridge, MA: HSRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Services Research Institute & National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services. (2012). National core indicators adult consumer survey 2010–11 final report. Cambridge, MA: HSRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corporation. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

  • IBM Corporation. (2012). IBM SPSS amos for windows, Version 20. Somers, NY: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A., & Perry, A. (2011). Outcomes in adolescents and adults with autism: A review of the literature. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(4), 1271–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., & Venter, A. (1992). Outcome and follow-up studies of high functioning autistic individuals. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), High functioning individuals with autism (pp. 187–200). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magaziner, J., Zimmerman, S., Gruber-Baldini, A. L., Hebel, J. R., & Fox, K. M. (1997). Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status comparison with self-reports and observations of performance. American Journal of Epidemiology, 146, 418–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehling, M. H., & Tassé, M. J. (2014). Empirically derived measurement model of social outcomes and predictors for Adults with ASD using National Core Indicator data. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 52(4), 282–295.

  • Mawhood, L. M., Howlin, P., & Rutter, M. (2000). Autism and developmental receptive language disorder: A follow-up comparison in early adult life: I. Cognitive and language outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 547–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely-Barnes, S., Marcenko, M., & Weber, L. (2008). Does choice influence quality of life for people with mild intellectual disabilities? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 12–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nordin, V., & Gillberg, C. (1998). The long-term course of autistic disorders: Update on follow-up studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 97, 99–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orsmond, G. I., Krauss, M. W., & Seltzer, M. M. (2004). Peer relationships and social and recreational activities among adolescents and adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(3), 245–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renty, J. O., & Roeyers, H. (2006). Quality of life in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorders: The predictive value of disability and support characteristics. Autism, 10, 511–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, L. A., & Dalrymple, N. J. (1996). An alternative view of outcome in autism. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: What we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48(3), 203–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, M. M., Schattuck, P., Abbeduto, L., & Greenberg, J. S. (2004). Trajectory of development in adolescents and adults with autism. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10, 234–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith G., & Ashbaugh J. (2001) National core indicators project: Phase II consumer survey technical report. Retrieved from http://www.hsri.org.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichá, R., Hewitt, A., Nord, D., & Larson, S. (2013). System and individual outcomes and their predictors in services and support for people with IDD. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 298–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, A. J., Watt, H. J., Line, E. A., & Bishop, D. V. (2009). Adult psychosocial outcomes of children with specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment, and autism. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44(4), 511–528.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Robert Cudeck, Ph.D. and Rebecca Andridge Ph.D. for their consultation regarding the statistical analyses carried out in this study. Authors would also like to acknowledge Human Services Research Institute (HSRI) and the National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services (NASDDDS) and thank these organizations for their contribution of the National Core Indicators (NCI) dataset to this study. This study was supported in part with funding from the U.S. Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Grant #99-DD-0621.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret H. Mehling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mehling, M.H., Tassé, M.J. Impact of Choice on Social Outcomes of Adults with ASD. J Autism Dev Disord 45, 1588–1602 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2312-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2312-6

Keywords

Navigation