Abstract
This study examined the sequential relationship between parent attentional cues and sustained attention to objects in young children with autism during a 20 min free-play interaction session. Twenty-five parent–child dyads with a preschool child with autism participated. Results indicated that (a) parent attentional cues that maintained the child’s focus of attention were more likely to support child sustained object attention than parent attentional cues that redirected the child from his or her focus of attention or introduced a new focus of attention (d = 4.46), and (b) parent attentional cues that included three or more parent behaviors were more likely to support child sustained object attention than parent attentional cues that included one or two parent behaviors (d = 1.03).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamson, L. B., & Bakeman, R. (1991). The development of shared attention during infancy. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (pp. 1–41). Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Ltd.
Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Academic Press.
Bakeman, R., Adamson, L. B., & Strisik, P. (1989). Lags and logs: Statistical approaches to interaction. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 241–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bartko, J. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19(1), 3–11.
Bloom, L. (1993). The transition from infancy to language: Acquiring the power of expression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bruckner, C. T., Yoder, P. J., & McWilliam, R. A. (2006). Generalizabilty and decision studies: An example using conversational language samples. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(2), 139–153.
Carpenter, M., Pennington, B., & Rogers, S. J. (2002). Interrelations among social-cognitive skills in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(2), 91–106.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Deák, G. O., Walden, T. A., Kaiser, M. Y., & Lewis, A. (2008). Driven from distraction: How infants respond to parents’ attempts to elicit and re-direct their attention. Infant Behavior and Development, 31(1), 34–50.
Felce, D., Bowley, C., Baxter, H., Jones, E., Lowe, K., & Emerson, E. (2000). The effectiveness of support staff: Evaluating active support training using a conditional probability approach. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21(4), 243–255.
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1996). The neuropsychology of autism. Brain, 119, 1377–1400.
Hayman, C. G., & Tulving, E. (1989). Contingent dissociation between recognition and fragment completion: The method of triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(2), 228–240.
Hollich, G. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Brand, R. J., Brown, E., Chung, H. L., et al. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(3), 1–138.
Landry, S. H., & Chapieski, M. L. (1989). Joint attention and infant toy exploration: Effects of Down syndrome and prematurity. Child Development, 60, 103–118.
Leekam, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Perrett, D., Milders, M., & Brown, S. (1997). Eye-direction detection: A dissociation between geometric and joint attention skills in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 77–95.
Leekam, S. R., Hunnisett, E., & Moore, C. (1998). Targets and cues: Gaze-following in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(7), 951–962.
Leekam, S. R., López, B., & Moore, C. (2000). Attention and joint attention in preschool children with autism. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 261–273.
Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Jr., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.
McWilliam, R. A., & Ware, W. B. (1994). The reliability of observations of young children’s engagement: An application of generalizabilty theory. Journal of Early Intervention, 18(1), 34–47.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Mullen, E. M. (1992). Mullen scales of early learning. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological.
Mundy, P., Sigman, M., Ungerer, J., & Sherman, T. (1986). Defining the social deficits of autism: The contribution of non-verbal communication measures. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27(5), 657–669.
Pierce, K., & Courchesne, E. (2001). Evidence for a cerebellar role in reduced exploration and stereotyped behavior in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 655–664.
Rosenthal, J. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21, 37–59.
Sameroff, A. J., & Chandler, M. J. (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In F. D. Horowitz, M. Hetherington, S. Scarr-Salapatck, & G. Siegel (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4, pp. 187–244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sanders, J., Johnson, K. A., Garavan, H., Gill, M., & Gallagher, L. (2008). A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research in autistic spectrum disorders: Attention, inhibition and cognitive flexibility. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 1–16.
Smith, D., Felce, D., Ahmed, Z., Fraser, W. I., Kerr, M., Kiernan, C., et al. (2002a). Sedation effects on responsiveness: Evaluating the reduction of antipsychotic mediation in people with intellectual disability using a conditional probability approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(6), 464–471.
Smith, C., Felce, D., Jones, E., & Lowe, K. (2002b). Responsiveness to staff support: Evaluating the impact of individual characteristics on the effectiveness of active support training using a conditional probability approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(8), 594–604.
Smith, C., Kerr, M., Felce, D., Baxter, H., Lowe, K., & Meek, A. (2004). Exploring the evaluation of antiepilectic drug change in people with intellectual disabilities and high-frequency epileptic seizures: Seizure control and sustained responsiveness to the environment. Epilepsy & Behavior, 5(1), 58–66.
Smoski, M. J., & Bachorowski, J. (2003). Antiphonal laughter between friends and strangers. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 327–340.
Tapp, J., & Walden, T. (1993). PROCODER: A professional tape control, coding, and analysis system for behavioral research using videotape. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(1), 53–56.
Tapp, J., Wehby, J., & Ellis, D. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27(1), 25–31.
Thompson, T., Symons, F., & Felce, D. (2000). Principles of behavioral observation. In T. Thompson, D. Felce, & F. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 3–16). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Whalen, C., & Schreibman, L. (2003). Joint attention training for children with autism using behavior modification procedures. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(3), 456–468.
Yoder, P. J., Short-Meyerson, K., & Tapp, J. (2004). Measurement of behavior with a special emphasis on sequential analysis of behavior. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson, & T. R. Parmenter (Eds.), The international handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities (pp. 179–199). New York: Wiley.
Yoder, P. J., & Stone, W. (2006). Randomized comparison of two communication interventions for preschoolers with autism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 426–435.
Yoder, P. J., & Tapp, J. (2004). Empirical guidance for time-window sequential analysis of single cases. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13(4), 227–246.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript was prepared based on the doctoral dissertation by the first author. This research was conducted with a subset of participants from a larger research study by the second author that was supported in part by the National Institute for Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant R01CD03581.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brigham, N.B., Yoder, P.J., Jarzynka, M.A. et al. The Sequential Relationship Between Parent Attentional Cues and Sustained Attention to Objects in Young Children with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 40, 200–208 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0848-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0848-7