Skip to main content
Log in

The Sequential Relationship Between Parent Attentional Cues and Sustained Attention to Objects in Young Children with Autism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the sequential relationship between parent attentional cues and sustained attention to objects in young children with autism during a 20 min free-play interaction session. Twenty-five parent–child dyads with a preschool child with autism participated. Results indicated that (a) parent attentional cues that maintained the child’s focus of attention were more likely to support child sustained object attention than parent attentional cues that redirected the child from his or her focus of attention or introduced a new focus of attention (d = 4.46), and (b) parent attentional cues that included three or more parent behaviors were more likely to support child sustained object attention than parent attentional cues that included one or two parent behaviors (d = 1.03).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamson, L. B., & Bakeman, R. (1991). The development of shared attention during infancy. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development (pp. 1–41). Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., Adamson, L. B., & Strisik, P. (1989). Lags and logs: Statistical approaches to interaction. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 241–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartko, J. J. (1966). The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychological Reports, 19(1), 3–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. (1993). The transition from infancy to language: Acquiring the power of expression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, C. T., Yoder, P. J., & McWilliam, R. A. (2006). Generalizabilty and decision studies: An example using conversational language samples. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(2), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., Pennington, B., & Rogers, S. J. (2002). Interrelations among social-cognitive skills in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(2), 91–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deák, G. O., Walden, T. A., Kaiser, M. Y., & Lewis, A. (2008). Driven from distraction: How infants respond to parents’ attempts to elicit and re-direct their attention. Infant Behavior and Development, 31(1), 34–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felce, D., Bowley, C., Baxter, H., Jones, E., Lowe, K., & Emerson, E. (2000). The effectiveness of support staff: Evaluating active support training using a conditional probability approach. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21(4), 243–255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1996). The neuropsychology of autism. Brain, 119, 1377–1400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, C. G., & Tulving, E. (1989). Contingent dissociation between recognition and fragment completion: The method of triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(2), 228–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollich, G. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Brand, R. J., Brown, E., Chung, H. L., et al. (2000). Breaking the language barrier: An emergentist coalition model for the origins of word learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(3), 1–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, S. H., & Chapieski, M. L. (1989). Joint attention and infant toy exploration: Effects of Down syndrome and prematurity. Child Development, 60, 103–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leekam, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Perrett, D., Milders, M., & Brown, S. (1997). Eye-direction detection: A dissociation between geometric and joint attention skills in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leekam, S. R., Hunnisett, E., & Moore, C. (1998). Targets and cues: Gaze-following in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(7), 951–962.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leekam, S. R., López, B., & Moore, C. (2000). Attention and joint attention in preschool children with autism. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 261–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Jr., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, R. A., & Ware, W. B. (1994). The reliability of observations of young children’s engagement: An application of generalizabilty theory. Journal of Early Intervention, 18(1), 34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, E. M. (1992). Mullen scales of early learning. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, P., Sigman, M., Ungerer, J., & Sherman, T. (1986). Defining the social deficits of autism: The contribution of non-verbal communication measures. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 27(5), 657–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, K., & Courchesne, E. (2001). Evidence for a cerebellar role in reduced exploration and stereotyped behavior in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 655–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, J. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sameroff, A. J., & Chandler, M. J. (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In F. D. Horowitz, M. Hetherington, S. Scarr-Salapatck, & G. Siegel (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4, pp. 187–244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., Johnson, K. A., Garavan, H., Gill, M., & Gallagher, L. (2008). A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research in autistic spectrum disorders: Attention, inhibition and cognitive flexibility. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Felce, D., Ahmed, Z., Fraser, W. I., Kerr, M., Kiernan, C., et al. (2002a). Sedation effects on responsiveness: Evaluating the reduction of antipsychotic mediation in people with intellectual disability using a conditional probability approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(6), 464–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Felce, D., Jones, E., & Lowe, K. (2002b). Responsiveness to staff support: Evaluating the impact of individual characteristics on the effectiveness of active support training using a conditional probability approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(8), 594–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Kerr, M., Felce, D., Baxter, H., Lowe, K., & Meek, A. (2004). Exploring the evaluation of antiepilectic drug change in people with intellectual disabilities and high-frequency epileptic seizures: Seizure control and sustained responsiveness to the environment. Epilepsy & Behavior, 5(1), 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoski, M. J., & Bachorowski, J. (2003). Antiphonal laughter between friends and strangers. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, J., & Walden, T. (1993). PROCODER: A professional tape control, coding, and analysis system for behavioral research using videotape. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(1), 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapp, J., Wehby, J., & Ellis, D. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27(1), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T., Symons, F., & Felce, D. (2000). Principles of behavioral observation. In T. Thompson, D. Felce, & F. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 3–16). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, C., & Schreibman, L. (2003). Joint attention training for children with autism using behavior modification procedures. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(3), 456–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, P. J., Short-Meyerson, K., & Tapp, J. (2004). Measurement of behavior with a special emphasis on sequential analysis of behavior. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson, & T. R. Parmenter (Eds.), The international handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities (pp. 179–199). New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, P. J., & Stone, W. (2006). Randomized comparison of two communication interventions for preschoolers with autism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 426–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, P. J., & Tapp, J. (2004). Empirical guidance for time-window sequential analysis of single cases. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13(4), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was prepared based on the doctoral dissertation by the first author. This research was conducted with a subset of participants from a larger research study by the second author that was supported in part by the National Institute for Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant R01CD03581.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolette Bainbridge Brigham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brigham, N.B., Yoder, P.J., Jarzynka, M.A. et al. The Sequential Relationship Between Parent Attentional Cues and Sustained Attention to Objects in Young Children with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 40, 200–208 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0848-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0848-7

Keywords

Navigation