Abstract
We investigated perception of social and physical causality and animacy in simple motion events, for high-functioning children with autism (CA = 13, VMA = 9.6). Children matched 14 different animations to pictures showing physical, social or non-causality. In contrast to previous work, children with autism performed at a high level similar to VMA-matched controls, recognizing physical causality in launch and social causality in reaction events. The launch deficit previously found in younger children with autism, possibly related to attentional/verbal difficulties, is apparently overcome with age. Some events involved squares moving non-rigidly, like animals. Children with autism had difficulties recognizing this, extending the biological motion literature. However, animacy prompts amplified their attributions of social causality. Thus children with autism may overcome their animacy perception deficit strategically.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, F., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2000). Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Journal of Cognitive Development, 15, 1–20.
Allen, G., & Courchesne, E. (2001). Attention function and dysfunction in autism. Frontiers in Bioscience, 6, 105–119.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). New York: American Psychiatric Association.
Baron Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.
Baron Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1986). Mechanical, behavioural and Intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. British Journal of developmental psychology, 4(2), 113–125.
Biro, S., & Leslie, A. M. (2007). Infants’ perception of goal-directed actions: Development through cue-based bootstrapping. Developmental Science, 10, 379–398.
Blake, R. M., Turner, L. M., Smoski, M. J., Pozdol, S. L., & Stone, W. L. (2003). Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism. Psychological Science, 14(2), 151–157.
Blakemore, S. J., Boyer, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Meltzoff, A., Segebarth, C., & Decety, J. (2003). The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 13(8), 837–844.
Blakemore, S. J., Fonhlupt, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Darmon, C., Boyer, P., Meltzoff, A. N., et al. (2001). How the brain perceives causality: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroReport, 12(17), 3741–3746.
Bowler, D., & Thommen, E. (2000). Attribution of mechanical and social causality to animated displays by children with autism. Autism, 4(2), 147–171.
Carter, A. S., Ornstein Davis, N., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2005). Social development in autism. In R. Paul, F. Volkmar, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and PDD (Vol. 1, pp. 312–334). NY: Wiley.
Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(8), 1839–1849.
Chawarska, K., & Volkmar, F. (2005). Autism in infancy and early childhood. In R. Paul, F. Volkmar, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and PDD (Vol. 1, pp. 223–246). NY: Wiley.
Cohen, L. B., & Amsel, G. (1998). Precursors to infant’s perception of the causality of a simple event. Infant behaviour and development, 21(4), 713–731.
Courchesne, E., Townsend, J., Akshoomoff, N. A., Saitoh, O., Yeung-Courchesne, R., Lincoln, A. J., et al. (1994). Impairment in shifting attention in autistic and cerebellar patients. Behavioural Neuroscience, 108(5), 848–865.
Dakin, S., & Frith, U. (2005). Vagaries of visual perception in autism. Neuron, 48, 497–507.
Dawson, G., Meltzoff, A., Osterling, J., & Rinaldi, J. (1998). Neuropsychological correlates of early symptoms of autism. Child Development, 69, 1276–1285.
Freitag, C. M., Konrad, C., Häberlen, M., Kleser, C., von Gontard, A., Reith, W., et al. (2007). Perception of biological motion in Autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1480–1494.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 287–292.
Happé, F. (2005). The weak central coherence account of autism. In R. Paul, F. Volkmar, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and PDD (Vol. 1, pp. 640–650). NY: Wiley.
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5–25.
Harris, N. S., Courchesne, E., Townsend, J., Carper, R. A., & Lord, C. (1999). Neuroanatomic contributions to slowed orienting of attention in children with autism. Cognitive Brain research, 8, 61–71.
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.
Herrington, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Singh, K. D., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M., et al. (2007). The role of MT+/V5 during biological motion perception in Asperger Syndrome: An fMRI study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 14–27.
Hood, B. M., Atkinson, J., & Braddick, O. J. (1998). Selection for action and the development of orienting and visual attention. In J. E. Richards (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention, a developmental perspective. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jarrold, C., & Brock, J. (2004). To match or not to match? Methodological issues in autism-related research. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 34, 81–86.
Johansson, G. (1973). Biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211.
Joliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal on the embedded figures test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 527–534.
Kanizsa, G., & Vicario, G. (1968). La percezione della reazione intenzionale (the perception of intentional reaction). In G. Kanizsa & G. Vicario (Eds.), Ricerche Sperimentali sulla percezione (Experimental research on perception), 71–126.
Klin, A. (2000). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The social attribution task. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 41(7), 831–846.
Klin, A., & Jones, W. (2008). Altered face scanning and impaired recognition of biological motion in a 15-month-old infant with autism. Developmental Science, 11(1), 40–46.
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R. T., & Volkmar, F. R. (2003). The Enactive Mind–from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 358, 345–360.
Klin, A., Volkmar, F. R., & Sparrow, S. S. (1992). Autistic social dysfunction: Some limitations of the theory of mind hypothesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(5), 861–876.
Landry, R., & Bryson, S. E. (2004). Impaired disengagement of attention in young children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(6), 1115–1122.
Langdell, T. (1978). Recognition of faces: An approach for the study of autism. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 19, 255–268.
Leslie, A. M. (1988). The necessity of illusion: Perception throughout infancy. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.), Thought without language (pp. 185–210). Oxford: Oxford Science Publications.
Leslie, A. M. (1995). A theory of agency. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A Multidisciplinary debate (pp. 121–141). Oxford [England], New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.
Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265–288.
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism diagnostic observation schedule–wps (ados–wps). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Loveland, K. A., & Landry, S. H. (1986). Joint attention and language in autism and developmental language delay. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16(3), 335–349.
Lunney, G. H. (1970). The use of analysis of variance with a dichotomous variable: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 263–269.
Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 16, 601–608.
Michotte, A. E. (1946/1963). The perception of causality. (tr. By T. R. Miles & E. Miles). London: Methuen.
Mottron, L., & Belleville, S. (1993). A study of perceptual analysis in a high-level autistic subject with exceptional graphic abilities. Brain and Cognition, 23(2), 279–309.
Mottron, L., & Burack, J. A. (2001). Enhanced perception functioning in the development of autism. In J. A. Burack, T. Charman, N. Yrimiya, & P. R. Zelazo (Eds.), The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research (pp. 131–148). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: London.
Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulières, I., Hubert, B., & Burack, J. A. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: An updated model, and eight principle of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, special issue: perception in autism, 36(1), 27–43.
Mundy, P., & Neal, R. A. (2001). Neural plasticity, joint attention, and a transactional social-orienting model of autism. In L. M. Glidden (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation: Autism (pp. 139–168). San Diego: Academic Press.
Mundy, P., Sigman, M., & Kasari, C. (1990). A longitudinal study of joint attention and language development in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20(1), 115–128.
Oakes, L. M., & Cohen, L. B. (1994). Infant causal perception. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 9, pp. 1–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Osterling, J., & Dawson, G. (1994). Early recognition of children with autism: A study of first birthday home videotapes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(3), 247–257.
Osterling, J. A., Dawson, G., & Munson, J. A. (2002). Early recognition of 1-year-old infants with autism spectrum disorders versus mental retardation. Development and psychopathology, 14(2), 239–251.
Ozonoff, S., Strayer, D. L., McMahon, W. M., & Filloux, F. (1994). Executive functioning abilities in autism and Tourette syndrome: An information processing approach. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 35(6), 1015–1032.
Pellicano, E., Gibson, L., Maybery, M., Durkin, K., & Badcock, D. R. (2005). Abnormal processing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: A possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coherence? Neuropsychologia, 43, 1044–1053.
Plaisted, K. (2001). Reduced generalization in autism: An alternative to weak central coherence. In J. A. Burack, T. Charman, N. Yirmiya, & P. R. Zelazo (Eds.), The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research (pp. 149–169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Plaisted, K., Swettenham, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 40, 733–742.
Ray, E., & Schlottmann, A. (2007). The perception of social and mechanical causality in young children with autism. Research in autism spectrum disorders, 1(3), 266–280.
Rogers, S., Cook, I., & Meryl, A. (2005). Imitation and play in autism. In R. Paul, F. Volkmar, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and PDD (Vol. 1, pp. 382–405). NY: Wiley.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. NY: McGraw Hill.
Rutherford, M. D., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (2006). The perception of animacy in young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(8), 983–992.
Schlottmann, A. (1999). Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: How children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 303–317.
Schlottmann, A. (2000). Is perception of causality modular? Trends in cognitive science, 4(12), 441–442.
Schlottmann, A., Allen, D., Linderoth, C., & Hesketh, S. (2002). Children’s intuitions of perceptual causality. Child Development, 73(6), 1656–1677.
Schlottmann, A., & Ray, E. D. (2004). Perceptual animacy in schematic motion events. Perception, 33 (ECVP 2004 Supplement), 308.
Schlottmann, A. & Ray, E. (2009). Goal attribution to schematic animals: Do 6-months-olds perceive biological motion as animate. Developmental Science, (in press).
Schlottmann, A., Ray, E. D., Mitchell, A., & Demetriou, N. (2006). Perceived physical and social causality in animated motions: Spontaneous reports and ratings. Acta Psychologica, 123(1–2), 112–143.
Schlottmann, A., & Surian, L. (1999). Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance? Perception, 28, 1105–1113.
Schlottmann, A., Surian, L., & Ray, E. (2009). The perception of action-and-reaction sequences in 8- to 10-months-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(1), 87–107.
Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in cognitive science, 4(8), 299–309.
Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1983). An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24(4), 613–620.
Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1993). Why do autistic individuals show superior performance on the block design task? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(8), 1351–1364.
Stechler, G., & Latz, E. (1966). Some observations on attention and arousal in the human infant. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 5, 517–525.
Tager-Flusberg, H., Paul, R., & Lord, C. (2005). Language and communication in autism. In R. Paul, F. Volkmar, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and PDD (Vol. 1, pp. 335–364). NY: Wiley.
Thommen, E., Dumas, A., Erskine, J., & Reymond, J. (1998). Perception and conceptualization of intentionality in children. British journal of developmental psychology, 16, 255–272.
Townsend, J., Harris, N. S., & Courchesne, E. (1996). Visual attention abnormalities in autism: Delayed orienting to location. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(6), 541–550.
Vivanti, G., Nadig, A., Ozonoff, S., & Rogers, S. J. (2008). What do children with autism attend to during imitation tasks? Journal of experimental child psychology, 101(3), 186–205.
Volkmar, F. R., & Mayes, L. C. (1990). Gaze behaviour in autism. Developmental Psychopathology, 2, 61–70.
Wainwright, J. A., & Bryson, S. E. (1996). Visual-spatial orienting in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(4), 423–438.
Wainwright-Sharp, J. A., & Bryson, S. E. (1993). Visual orienting deficits in high-functioning people with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 23(1), 1–13.
Watts, N., Schlottmann, A., & Ray, E. (2007). The role of contact and self-initiated motion in perceptual causality. Paper presented at the society for the research on child development, Boston, MA.
Wechsler, D. (1986). Wisc-r scala di intelligenza wechsler per bambini riveduta. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
Winer, B. J., Brown, D., & Michels, K. (1991). Statistical procedures in experimental design (3rd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.
Acknowledgments
This paper is based on SC’s doctoral dissertation submitted to the University of Siena. SC was supported by a doctoral fellowship of Regione Sardegna and by the University of Siena, AS and ER were supported by ESRC grant R000230198. Many thanks to the children and parents involved, in particular to Giacomo Vivanti for his comments and his help in testing children with autism, to the staff at the Neuropsychiatry Unit at the Hospital in Siena, and L’Aquila, to the staff at the Quartu S.E. primary school, and to Luca Surian for discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Congiu, S., Schlottmann, A. & Ray, E. Unimpaired Perception of Social and Physical Causality, but Impaired Perception of Animacy in High Functioning Children with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 40, 39–53 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0824-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0824-2