Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Special Education Versus Inclusive Education: The Role of the TEACCH Program

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our study aimed at comparing, over a period of 3 years, the effectiveness of three different educational approaches addressed to children with autism and severe mental retardation. The first one was a treatment and education of autistic and related communication handicapped children (TEACCH) program implemented in a residential center; the second was a TEACCH program implemented at home and at mainstream schools, after a specific parent psychoeducational training; the third approach referred to inclusive education in mainstream schools, in which a nonspecific approach was implemented. Each subject was assessed twice, using the Psycho-Educational Profile-Revised (PEP-R) and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS)-survey form. Effectiveness of TEACCH appeared to be confirmed, showing positive outcomes in the natural setting, and revealing its inclusive value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, TSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P., Karlof, K. L., & Siperstein, G. N. (2008). Maternal involvement in the education of young children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 12(47), 47–63. doi:10.1177/1362361307085269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behaviour problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini, M. (1989). Sviluppo intellettivo e sociale nella sindrome di Down: Fattori rilevanti. In R. Ferri & A. Spagnolo (Eds.), La sindrome di Down. Roma: Pensiero Scientifico.

  • Dunlap, G., Johnson, L. F., & Robbins, F. R. (1990). Preventing serious behavior problems through skill development and early intervention. In A. C. Repp & N. N. Singh (Eds.), Perspectives on the use of nonaversive and aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlin, P. (1998). Practitioner review: psychological and educational treatments for autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(3), 307–322. doi:10.1017/S0021963097002138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, K., & Odom, S. (2007). Effects of an individual work system on the independent functioning of students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(6), 1166–1180. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0260-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ijichi, N., & Ijichi, S. (2006). TEACCH should be inclusive. Autism, 10(5), 526. doi:10.1177/136236130601000509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Bimbela, A., & Screibman, L. (1996). Collateral effects of parent training on family interactions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(3), 347–359. doi:10.1007/BF02172479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McConachie, H., & Diggle, T. (2007). Parent implemented early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13(1), 120–129. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00674.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesibov, G., & Howley, M. (2003). Accessing the curriculum for pupils with autistic spectrum disorders: using the TEACCH programme to help inclusion. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshew, N. J., & Williams, D. L. (2007). The new neurobiology of autism. Archives of Neurology, 64(7), 945–950. doi:10.1001/archneur.64.7.945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moes, D. R., & Frea, W. D. (2002). Contextualized behavioral support in early intervention for children with autism and their families. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(6), 519–533. doi:10.1023/A:1021298729297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Committee on educational interventions for children with autism. In C. Lord & J. P. McGee (Eds.), Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgate, R. (1998). Reducing self-injurious behaviour in a child with severe learning difficulties: enhancing predictability and structure. Educational Psychology in Practice, 14, 176–182. doi:10.1080/0266736980140304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., & Cathcart, K. (1998). Effectiveness of a home program intervention for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28(1), 25–32. doi:10.1023/A:1026006818310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panerai, S. (1999). Importanza ed efficacia dell’insegnamento strutturato e degli ausili visivi: presentazione di un caso clinico con diagnosi di autismo associato a ritardo mentale grave. Ciclo evolutivo e disabilità, 2(2), 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panerai, S., Ferrante, L., & Caputo, V. (1997). The TEACCH strategy in mentally retarded children with autism: a multidimensional assessment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27(3), 345–347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panerai, S., Ferrante, L., Caputo, V., & Impellizzeri, C. (1998). Use of structured teaching for treatment of children with autism and severe and profound mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panerai, S., Ferrante, L., & Zingale, M. (2002). Benefits of the treatment and education of autistic and communication handicapped children (TEACCH) programme as compared with a non-specific approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(4), 318–327. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00388.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, P., & Leppert, T. (2008). Brief report: Outcomes of a teacher-training program for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (in press).

  • Reeve, C. E., & Carr, E. G. (2000). Prevention of severe behavior problems in children with developmental disorders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 144–160. doi:10.1177/109830070000200303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Le Couteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003). ADI-R: Autism diagnostic interview—revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, A. R., & Zelman, J. G. (1981). The learning accomplishment profile (revised edition). Winston Salem (CA): Kaplan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E. (1994). A statewide program for the treatment and education of autistic and related communication handicapped children (TEACCH). Psychoses and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, 3, 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Mesibov, G. B., & Hearsey, K. (1995). Structured teaching in the TEACCH system. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., Bashford, A., Lansing, M. D., & Marcus, L. M. (1990). Individualised assessment and treatment for autistic and developmentally disabled children, vol. I: Psychoeducational Profile Revised (PEP/R). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Lansing, M. D. (1980). Individualised assessment and treatment for autistic and developmentally disabled children, vol.2: Teaching strategies for parents and professionals. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. (1988). The childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siaperas, P., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2006). A case study of the use of a structured teaching approach in adults with autism in a residential home in Greece. Autism, 10(4), 330–343. doi:10.1177/1362361306064433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. (1994). Vineland adaptive behaviour scale (survey form). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, S. K., Shek, D. T., Lam, L. L., Tang, F. L., & Cheung, P. M. (2007). Brief report: Application of the TEACCH program on Chinese pre-school children with autism. Does culture make a difference? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(2), 390–396. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0199-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for the help of the parents, operators and children who participated in this study. Some of this data were presented at XXIX International Congress of Psychology, Berlin, Germany, July 20–25, 2008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simonetta Panerai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panerai, S., Zingale, M., Trubia, G. et al. Special Education Versus Inclusive Education: The Role of the TEACCH Program. J Autism Dev Disord 39, 874–882 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0696-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0696-5

Keywords

Navigation