Abstract
There has been much research concerning functional assessment over the past 20 years, but several important research considerations have yet to be explained. One is the comparison of different types of functional assessment (e.g., experimental functional analysis and non-experimental functional assessment). The current study aims to compare the different methodologies of functional assessment and their effectiveness in ascribing function to a target behavior and in the treatment selection that follows such an assessment. Quantitative synthesis data were used to answer questions regarding behavioral function, assessment type, and treatment effectiveness. Results indicate that assessment type can impact treatment effectiveness and that there is a relationship between behavior type and ascribed function.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, D. B., Faith, M. S., & Franklin, R. D. (1995). Antecedent exercise in the treatment of disruptive behavior: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 279–303.
Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (1993). Calculating effect sizes for meta-analysis: The case of the single case. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 621–631.
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: Fourth edition text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Applegate, H., Matson, J. L., & Cherry, K. E. (1999). An evaluation of functional variables affecting severe problem behaviors in adults with mental retardation by using the questions about behavioral function scale (QABF). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 229–237.
Axelrod, S. (1987). Functional and structural analyses of behavior: Approaches leading to reduced use of punishment procedures. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 165–178.
Campbell, J. M. (2003). Efficacy of behavioral interventions for reducing problem behavior in persons with autism: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 120–138.
Campbell, J. M. (2004). Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject designs. Behavior Modification, 28, 234–246.
Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800–816.
Carr, E. G., Langdon, N. A., & Yarborough, S. C. (1999). Hypothesis-based intervention for severe problem behavior. In A. C. Repp, & R. H. Horner, (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior (pp. 9–31). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Chitiyo, M. S. (2005). Functional/Structural analysis: A brief review of functional assessment studies conducted with people with challenging behaviours. The International Journal of Special Education, 20, 102–110.
Dawson, J. E., Matson, J. L., & Cherry, K. E. (1998). An analysis of maladaptive behaviors in persons with autism, PDD-NOS, and mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 19, 439–448.
Derby, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Northup, J., Cigrand, K., & Asmus, J. (1992). Brief functional assessment techniques to evaluate aberrant behavior in an outpatient setting: A summary of 79 cases. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 713–721.
Didden, R., Duker, P. C., & Korzilius, H. (1997). Meta-analytic study on treatment effectiveness for problem behaviors with individuals that have mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 387–399.
Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99–117.
Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1992). The motivation assessment scale (MAS) administration guide. Topeka, KS: Monaco and Associates.
Faith, M. S., Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (1996). Meta-analysis of single-case research. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds), Design and analysis of single-case research (pp. 245–277). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fombonne, E. (2005). Epidemiological studies or pervasive developmental disorders. In F. R.Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 42–69). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Gresham, F. M., McIntyre, L. L., Olson-Tinker, H., Dolstra, L., McLaughlin, V., & Van, M. (2004). Relevance of functional behavioral assessment research for school-based interventions and positive behavioral support. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 19–37.
Horner, R. H. (1994). Functional assessment: Contributions and future directions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 401–404.
Horner, R. H., & Carr, E. G. (1997). Behavioral support for students with severe disabilities: Functional assessment and comprehensive intervention. Journal of Special Education, 31, 84–104.
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Strain, P. S., Todd, A. W., & Reed, H. K. (2002). Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 423–446.
Horner, R. H., Day, H. M., & Day, J. R. (1997). Using neutralizing routines to reduce problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 601–614.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments (1997). Pub.L. No. 105–117, USC 1400 et seq.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act Amendments (2004). Pub.L. No. 108–446.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994a). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209 (reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Dorsey, M. F., Zarcone, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., Smith, R. G., Rodgers, T. A., Lerman, D. C., Shore, D. A., Mazaleski, J. L., Goh, H., Cowdery, G. E., Kalsher, M. J., McCosh, K. C., & Willis, K. D. (1994b). The functional analysis of self-injurious behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 215–240.
Johnson, W. L., & Baumeister, A. (1978). Self-injurious behavior: A review and analysis of methodological details of published studies. Behavior Modification, 2, 465–484.
Kahng, S., Iwata, B. A., & Lewin, A. B. (2002a). Behavioral treatment of self-injury, 1964–2000. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 212–221.
Kahng, S., Iwata, B. A., & Lewin, A. B. (2002b). The impact of functional assessment on the treatment of self-injurious behavior. In S. R. Schroeder, M. L. Oster-Granite, & Thompson, (Eds.), Self-injurious behavior: Gene-brain-behavior relationships (pp. 119–131). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Kern, L., Hilt, A. M., & Gresham, F. (2004). An evaluation of the functional behavioral assessment process used with students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 440–452.
Kincaid, D., Knoster, T., Harrower, J. K., Shannon, P., & Bustamante, S. (2002). Measuring the impact of positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 109–117.
Laski, F. (1987). Epilogue. In: D. Guess, E. Helmstetter, H. R. Turnbull, & S. Knowlton, (Eds.), Use of aversive procedures with persons who are disabled: A historical review and critical analysis. Seattle, WA: The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps.
Lundervold, D., & Bourland, G. (1988). Quantitative analysis of treatment of aggression, self-injury, and property destruction. Behavior Modification, 12, 590–617.
Martin, N. T., Gaffan, E. A., & Williams, T. (1999). Experimental functional analyses for challenging behavior: a study of validity and reliability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 125–146.
Matson, J. L., Bamburg, J. W., Cherry, K. E., & Paclawskyj, T. R. (1999). A validity study on the questions about behavioral function (QABF) scale: predicting treatment success for self-injury, aggression, and stereotypies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 163–176.
Matson, J. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (1995). User’s guide: Questions about behavioral function (QABF). Baton Rouge, LA: Scientific Publishers Inc.
Matson, J. L., & Taras, M. E. (1989). A 20 year review of punishment and alternative methods to treat problem behaviors in developmentally delayed persons. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 85–104.
McClintock, K., Hall, S., & Oliver, C. (2003). Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 405–416.
Mesibov, G. B., Browder, D. M., & Kirkland, C. (2002). Using individualized schedules as a component of positive behavioral support for students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 73–79.
Myers, J. L., & Well, A. D. (2003). Research design and statistical analysis (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Northup, J., Wacker, D., Sasso, G., Steege, M., Cigrand, K., Cook, J., & Deraad, A. (1991). A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 509–522.
O’Brien, S., & Repp, A. C. (1990). Reinforcement-based reductive procedures: A review of 20 years of their use with persons with severe to profound mental retardation. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15, 148–159.
O’Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., Sprague, J. R., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment of problem behavior: A practical assessment guide. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Pelios, L., Morren, J., Tesch, D., & Axelrod, S. (1999). The impact of functional analysis methodology on treatment choice for self-injurious and aggressive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 32, 185–195.
Piazza, C. C., Hanley, G. P., & Fisher, W. W. (1996). Functional analysis of cigarette pica. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 29, 437–439.
Repp, A., & Horner, R. H. (Eds.). (1999). Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Scotti, J. R., Evans, I. M., Meyer, L. H., & Walker, P. (1991). A meta-analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 233–256.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Cook, S. B., & Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 260–271.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221–242.
Shogren, K. A., Faggella-Luby, M. N., Bae, S. J., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). The effect of choice-making as an intervention for problem behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 6, 228–237.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
Sturmey, P. (1995). Analog baselines: A critical review of the methodology. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 269–284.
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. R. (1999). Functional assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice to research. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 223–227.
Toogood, S., & Timlin, K., (1996). The functional assessment of challenging behavior: A comparison of informant-based, experimental and descriptive methods. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 206–222.
Vollmer, T. R. (1994). The concept of automatic reinforcement: implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 187–207.
Wehmeyer, M. L., (1995). Intra-individual factors influencing interventions for stereotyped behaviours: A meta-analysis. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 39, 205–214.
Wieseler, N. A., Hanzel, T. E., Chamberlain, T. P., & Thompson, T. (1985). Functional taxonomy of stereotypic and self-injurious behavior. Mental Retardation, 23, 230–234.
Wicks-Nelson, R., & Israel, A. C. (1999). Autism and schizophrenia. In: R. Wicks-Nelson, & A. C. Israel, (Eds.), Behavior disorders of early childhood (pp. 330–363). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wolery, M., Bailey, D. B., & Sugai, G. M. (Eds.). (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Needham, MA: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank David L. Gast and A. Michele Lease for their support and constructive comments regarding this study. We also thank Jane F. Morton for rating and coding several studies for reliability purposes.
This quantitative review was completed as part of the requirements for the Masters of Arts degree in Educational Psychology for Caitlin V. Herzinger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herzinger, C.V., Campbell, J.M. Comparing Functional Assessment Methodologies: A Quantitative Synthesis. J Autism Dev Disord 37, 1430–1445 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0219-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0219-6