Skip to main content
Log in

Lexical Knowledge and Lexical Use in Autism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One aspect of autistic language that has been infrequently researched is vocabulary and the conceptual knowledge underpinning individual words or word types. In this descriptive study we investigate anomalous vocabulary use in a 70,000-word corpus of conversational autistic language and examine evidence that concept formation, and hence vocabulary, is abnormal in autism. Particular attention is paid to the expression of artifact and temporal concepts which some believe may develop abnormally in autism. Little evidence is found of anomalous use of artifact terms, though errors with temporal (and also spatial) expressions are relatively common. We discuss why this may be and consider several potential explanations for why underlying lexical knowledge in autism may not necessarily be reflected in lexical use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Fast mapping refers to the ability of typically developing young children to connect a new word with an underlying concept after only a brief encounter with the word.

  2. Referred to as ‘RES’ in the transcript examples below.

  3. Testing of the participant referred to as George was stopped part way through as he appeared to find the process particularly stressful and taxing.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edition) (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). Perceptual role taking and protodeclarative pointing in autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Baldwin, D., & Crowson, M. (1997). Do children with autism use the speaker’s direction of gaze strategy to crack the code of language? Child Development, 68, 48–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolucci, G., Pierce, S., & Streiner, D. (1980). Cross-sectional studies of grammatical morphemes in autistic and mentally retarded children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10, 39–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellugi, U., Marks, S., Bihrle, A., & Sabo, H. (1988). Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. In D. V. M. Bishop, & K. Mogford, (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances (pp. 177–189). London: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60, 1–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children’s naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 8, 200–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, J. (2001). ‘Lost in a sea of time’: time-parsing and autism. In C. Hoerl, & T. McCormack, (Eds.), Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 111–135). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesendruck, G., Markson, L., & Bloom, P. (2003). Children’s reliance on the creator’s intent in extending names for artifacts. Psychological Science, 14, 164–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbinson, S. (2000). Repetitiveness and Productivity in the Language of Adults with Autism. Unpublished PhD, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.

  • Dobbinson, S., Perkins, M. R., & Boucher, J. (1997). A comparison of two autistic language users. Collected Papers from the Conference on Therapeutic Intervention in Autism: Perspectives from Research and Practice, 1996, (pp. 231–258). University of Durham.

  • Dobbinson, S., Perkins, M. R., & Boucher, J. (1998). Structural patterns in conversations with a woman who has autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31(2), 113–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbinson, S., Perkins, M. R., & Boucher, J. (2003). The interactional significance of formulas in adult autistic language. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17, 299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2000). Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it. Cognition, 76, 91–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillberg, C., & Peeters, T. (1995). Autism: Medical and educational aspects. London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F. G. E. (1994). Autism: An inroduction to psychological theory. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P. (1993). Autism and the development of mind. Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P., & Lee, A. (1989). Emotion-related and abstract concepts in autistic people: evidence from the British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 4, 601–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold, C., Boucher, J., & Russell, J. (1997). Language profiles in children with autism: Theoretical and methodological implications. Autism, 1, 57–76l.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbance of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemler-Nelson, D. G., Frankenfield, A., Morris, C., & Blair, E. (2000). Young children’s use of functional information to categorize artifacts: three factors that matter. Cognition, 77, 133–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kjelgaard, M. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). An investigation of language impairment in autism: implications for genetic subgroups. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(2/3), 287–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, L., & Dawson, G. (1995). A fresh look at categorisation abilities in persons with autism. In E. Schopler, & G. Mesibov, (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism (pp. 119–136). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., & Paul, R. (1997). Communication in autism. In F. Volkmar, & D. Cohen, (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, third edition: volume 1: transcription format and programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. (1997). Communication. In D. J. Cohen, & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prizant, B. M. (1983). Language acquisition and communicative behaviour in autism: toward an understanding of the ‘whole’ of it. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 296–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stojanovik, V., Perkins M. R., & Howard S. (2004). Williams syndrome and specific language impairment do not support claims for developmental double dissociations and innate modularity. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 403–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (1985a). Basic level and superordinate level categorization by autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 450–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (1985b). The conceptual basis for referential word meaning in children with autism. Child Development, 56, 1167–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (1993). What language reveals about the understanding of minds in children with autism. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen, (Eds.), Understanding other minds. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerer, J. A., & Sigman, M. (1987). Categorization skills and receptive language development in autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 3–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children – Anglicised revised edition. Kent: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children (Revised). London: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. (2002). Temporal and spatial concepts in child language: conventional and configurational. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 195–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (1993). Vocabulary development in an autistic boy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 185–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, L. (1996). The autistic spectrum: A guide for parents and professionals. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by ESRC Grant R000223199. Thanks to Marcin Szczerbinski for statistical advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Perkins.

Appendix: Coding Categories

Appendix: Coding Categories

1 Vocabulary Codes

ACT: Activities

Actions or behaviours defined by their ongoing nature and without a specified beginning or ending

e.g. weightlifting, golf, relaxation

ARF: Artifacts

Entities that exist through human agency

e.g. house, clock, War and Peace

BDP: Body parts

e.g. head, face, arm

EVT: Events

Single instances of actions, activities or behaviours with a beginning and an end.

e.g. holiday, birthday, the Russian Revolution

FDD: Food

e.g. sweets, coffee, sausage

IPS: Proper names of individuals

Includes people and animals

e.g. Uncle Gerry, Winston Churchill, Fluffy

IPC: Proper names of places

Includes inanimate entities and locations

e.g. Hampstead Heath, Marks & Spencer’s, my sister’s

NAT: Natural kinds

Entities which occur naturally, not dependent on human agency

e.g. man, apple, water

NOM: Nominal kinds

Socio-culturally defined entities not otherwise identified in the other non-natural kind subcategories listed here.

e.g. wife, chemistry, government

Not coded

Various item such as:

  • colours and shapes

  • abstract items like temperature, communication, silence, life, freedom

2 Spatiotemporal Codes

Space absolute

Spatial entities whose location is specified independently of the location of the speaker and/or hearer or other entities

e.g. Sheffield, Big Ben, the Rhine

Space relative

Spatial entities whose location is specified relative to the location of the speaker and/or hearer or other entities

e.g. over there, near Dallas, this finger

Time absolute

Temporal events whose location in time is specified independently of the time of the speaker’s utterance or other temporal events

e.g. 2001, February, Christmas Eve

Time relative

Temporal events whose location in time is specified relative to the time of the speaker’s utterance or other temporal events

e.g. last year, tomorrow, in two weeks’ time

3 Error Codes

ARG: Omission of obligatory clause argument

e.g. *PEN: ^ do whatever ^ want in there.

ART: Errors in the use of articles

e.g. *TOM: think it is the Europe’s biggest country.

ASP: Aspectuality errors

e.g. *GAR: I’m feel sad.

COM: Comprehension errors

e.g. *RES: when did you start liking Keith?

*PEN: very much as well.

GRR: Grammatical role errors

e.g. *GEO: in case they ever have an accident or be died.

LEX: Lexical error

e.g.*TOM: within a generation it is in difficulty of not having any at all.

(difficulty selected instead of danger)

MOD: Modality errors

e.g.*TOM: they could have declared war on Russia.

*RES: they were gonna or they could have?

*TOM: I said they were almost at war with Russia <at times> [<].

OTH: Other miscellaneous errors

e.g.*GAR: that that corders me.

PREP: Preposition error

e.g.*MAR: I went on the end of July.

PRON: Pronoun error

e.g.*MAR: I says to me [should be ‘her’]

SYN: Syntagmatic sense errors

e.g.*TIN: what be able to do it a leopard.

TIM: Time errors

e.g.*RES: can you tell me what breakfast means?

*TOM: a first meal of the day prior to waking.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perkins, M., Dobbinson, S., Boucher, J. et al. Lexical Knowledge and Lexical Use in Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 36, 795–805 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0120-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0120-3

Keywords

Navigation