Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ICT Proficiency and gender: a validation on training and development

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of innovative learning/instruction mode, embedded in the Certification Pathway System (CPS) developed by Certiport TM, is geared toward Internet and Computing Benchmark & Mentor specifically for IC³ certification. The Internet and Computing Core Certification (IC3), as an industrybased credentialing program, utilizes CPS and has been recognized by the Certification Recognition Program of the National Skill Standards Board (NSSB) in the US. The CPS, as an individualized learning plan, gears to guide learners through the learning process of pre-assessment, training, practice tests, and portfolio management. The study is to examine whether there are differential effects on computer competency and performance, specifically taking into account gender and types of enrolled program in relation to career and technical education. Our research addresses whether the gender-related differences along with enrolled programs and levels of study differ in performance of information and communications technologies (ICT) including the aspects of Computer Fundamentals (CF), Key Applications (KA), and Living Online (LO). A total of 185 university students were randomly assigned to participate in the CPS and encouraged to take a series of certifying exams. In addition to the official certifying exams, the participants took the CPS which focuses on the three learning processes, i.e., preassessment, training, practice tests. The results showed that gender-related differences exist in all three aspects of ICT performance. In terms of levels of study (LS), differences existed only in the aspects of CF and LO. Various types of enrolled programs (i.e. day program, evening program, weekend program) differ in all the three aspects (i.e., CF, KA, LO). Further discussion and implications were also included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bikson, T. K., & Panis, C. W. A. (1997). Computers and connectivity: Current trends. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet. Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 660–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1989). On the use of Structural Equation Models in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. (1998). What can we learn from the history of technology? Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M. M. (1998). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning: The implication of research related in education engineering. Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1).

  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couper, M., & Groves, R. (1996). Household-level determinants of survey nonresponse. New Directions for Evaluation: Advances in Survey Research, 70, 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, N., Bosker, R. J., & Harskamp, E. G. (In Press). Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.004. Computers & Education, In Press, Accepted Manuscript.

  • Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, M. (2008). Vocational education. Research Starters Education: Vocational Education, 1–1.

  • Dundell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes toward the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an east European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, W. H., Cheong, P. H., & Park, N. (2004). An ecology of constraints on e-learning in higher education: The case of virtual learning environment. Prometheus, 22(2), 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the pyschology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1), Online.

  • Games, P. A., & Howell, J. F. (1976). Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with Unequaln’s and/or Variances: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, L. (Ed.). (1994). Step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igbaria, M., & Livari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2823–2837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Y. (1956). Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics, 12, 309–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronsnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 537–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. A. (1998). Exploring personal computer adoption dynamics. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., & Overbaugh, R. C. (2009). Computer-mediated discussion, self-efficacy, and gender. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 999–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIlroy, D., Bunting, K., Tierney, K., & Gordon, M. (2001). The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxieties and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middendorf, E. (2002). Computernutzung und Neue Medien im Studium (Computer use and new media in higher education). Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.

  • Mitra A., Lenzmeier S., Steffensmeier T., Avon, R., Qu, N., & Hazen, M. (2000). Gender and computer use in an academic institution: report from a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 67-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachtigall, C., Ulf Kroehne, F. F., & Rolf, S. (2003). (Why) Should we use SEM? Pros and cons of Structural Equation Modeling. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSSB Recognizes First IT Certification Program. (2002). Vocational training newsletter, 33, 2.

  • Rubin, A. M. (Ed.). (2002). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh, N. (2009). The digital divide and social justice. Feliciter, 55(6), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaumburg, H. (2004). Laptop computers in the classroom—a way to overcome the technological gender gap among students? Medienpsychologie, 16, 142–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schottenbauer, M. A. (2004). Computers, anxiety, and gender: an analysis of reactions to the Y2K computer problem. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education, 40(4), 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M. R., & Stern, B. (2002). Consumer bidding behavior on Internet auction sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(1), 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1953). The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript. In the collected works of John W. Tukey VIII. Multiple comparisons, Vol. 1948–1983, pp. 1–300. New York: Chapman and Hall.

  • Varma, R. (2009). Gender differences in factors influencing students towards computing. Computer Science Education, 19(1), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., Spiel, C., & Wagner, P. (2003). Structural Equations Modeling in developmental research concepts and applications. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 75–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, I., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the Internet: Causes of variations in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 252–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. J. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A metal-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Business Administration, National Taichung University of Education, 227 Min-Shen Road, Taichung, 40306, Taiwan

    Shinyi Lin

  2. Biostatistics Division, inVentiv Clinical Solutions, LLC, 224 Schilling Circle, Suite 160, Hunt Valley, MD, 21031, USA

    Tse-Hua Shih

  3. Taiyuan Normal University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China

    Ruiling Lu

Authors
  1. Shinyi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tse-Hua Shih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruiling Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinyi Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, S., Shih, TH. & Lu, R. ICT Proficiency and gender: a validation on training and development. Int J Technol Des Educ 23, 179–190 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9173-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9173-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation