Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technology education for children in primary schools in Finland and Germany: different school systems, similar problems and how to overcome them

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even if the results of international student assessment studies such as PISA or TIMSS show that girls have been catching up in mathematics and natural sciences, there are still remarkable gender differences in the number of males and females studying and working in the technological fields after basic education. Technology is still a male-dominated area. This is true for the German and Finnish societies. Results of the studies conducted in the UPDATE project show that influences on interest in technological themes take place already in early childhood. Therefore, efforts should be put in developing early childhood education and elementary school education, to raise girls’ interests and motivation towards technology. This article reports the results of the UPDATE-WorkPackage3-project mainly in Finland and in Germany. It concentrates on studying elementary school pupils’ (age 6–12), particularly girls’ motivation towards the contents and methods of technology education. Various curriculum documents and national learning conditions are discussed and suggestions for the gender equitable technology education are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Endepohls-Ulpe, M. (2008). Hochbegabte Mädchen in Mathematik, Naturwissenschaft und Technik—Chancen und Risiken. In E. Sander & B. Kessler (Eds.), Ada-Lovelace Schriftenreihe. Heft 13, Remagen: Fachhochschule Koblenz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gila, H. (2001). Declining gender differences from FIMS to TIMSS. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 32(1), 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 387–467). New york: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lück, G. (2000). Naturwissenschaften im frühen Kindesalter. Untersuchungen zur Primärbegegnung von Kindern im Vorschulalter mit Phänomenen der unbelebten Natur. Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luomalahti, M. 2005. Naisopiskelijoiden teknologiasuuntautuminen luokanopettajakoulutuksessa. University of Tampere. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1065.

  • Möller, K. (1994). Entwicklungslinien im Technikbereich in der Primarstufe seit 1980. In J. Wiechmann (Ed.), Reformperspektiven für die Primarstufe (pp. 53–75). Kiel: IPN. S.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Framework Curriculum for Basic Education. (2004). POPS 2004. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikka, M. (1998). Teknologiakompetenssi. Teknologiakasvatuksen uudistamishaasteita peruskoulussa ja lukiossa. University of Jyväskylä. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research 141.

  • Parikka, M. & Rasinen, A. (1993). Technology education experiment. Curricular points of departure for the experiment. In I. Mottier, J. Ratt & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Technology education and the environment. Improving our environment through technology education. Proceedings PATT-6 conference. Eindhoven University of Technology, 189–206.

  • Prenzel, M., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Hammann, M., Klieme, E., et al. (Eds.). (2006). PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presentations in UPDATE-meeting, Aix-en Provence, France 22nd–23rd, May, 2008: Austria: Seiter, J. (curriculum available: www.bmukk.gv.at), Estonia: Lind, E., Paas, K., Pappel, K. and Soobik, M., Finland: Ikonen, P and Virtanen, S. (curriculum available 23rd Sept, 2008): http://www.oph.fi/english/page.asp?path=447,27598,37840,72101,72106), France: Chatoney, M., Germany: Endepohls-Ulpe, M. and von Zabern J. (Curriculum of North-Rhine-Westfalia, Bavaria, Berlin Mecklenburg West-Pommerania and Brandenburg).

  • Rasinen, A., Ikonen, P., & Rissanen, T. (2006). Are girls equal in technology education? In M. J. de Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education. Revieving the past twenty years (pp. 449–461). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasinen, A., Virtanen, S., & Miyakawa, H. (2009). Analysis of technology education in the five EU countries and challenges of technology education—the Finnish perspective. In H. Miyakawa (Ed.), Cross border: International cooperation in industrial technology education. Japan: Aichi University of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkama, E. & Wright, S. (2009). “Hei miten puukässä ja tietokoneet liittyy toisiinsa?” 5-luokkalaisten kokemuksia teknologiasta. “Hey, what has wood working and computers to do with each other?” Experiences of 5-graders of technology. University of Jyväskylä, Teacher Education Faculty. Pro gradu tutkielma.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aki Rasinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasinen, A., Virtanen, S., Endepohls-Ulpe, M. et al. Technology education for children in primary schools in Finland and Germany: different school systems, similar problems and how to overcome them. Int J Technol Des Educ 19, 367–379 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9097-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9097-5

Keywords

Navigation