Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Insights into the intrinsic and extrinsic challenges for implementing technology education: case studies of Queensland teachers

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study, embedded within the Researching School Change in Technology Education (RSCTE) project in Queensland, Australia, aimed to gain insights into the intrinsic and extrinsic challenges experienced by teachers during the implementation of technology education within primary school settings. The official publication and launch of the Technology years 1–10 syllabus and associated curriculum materials by the Queensland Studies Authority during 2003 saw the first formal Technology curriculum for primary schools in Queensland. The Queensland Government announced that all Queensland schools were to aim for full implementation of this new Key Learning Area (KLA) by 2007. This presented a challenge for Queensland teachers as they began to understand this new KLA and subsequently, were required to implement technology education for the first time. Education Queensland released a number of different strategies that were designed to assist this implementation, including research partnerships with universities. Thus, the RSCTE project, a partnership project between Education Queensland and Griffith University included implementation research within schools. Through the identification of insights into intrinsic and extrinsic challenges, this study, while recognising the limitations of transferability beyond the case studies presented, provides suggestions to assist the implementation of technology education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Academy of Technological Sciences, Engineering (2004). Technology is really a way of thinking. Victoria: Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, F. R. J. (1996). Developing professional knowledge during initial design and technology teacher education. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 1(2), 175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2004). From idea-generating to idea-focusing: Systematic inventive design and problem-solving methods. Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Learning for Innovation in Technology Education, December 2004 (Vol. 1, pp. 17–23). Gold Coast: Centre for Learning Research, Griffith University.

  • Björklund, L., & Klasander, C. (2004). Understanding technological systems: Classroom implications for a systems approach. Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Learning for Innovation in Technology Education, December 2004 (Vol. 1, pp. 78–86). Gold Coast: Centre for Learning Research Griffith University.

  • Brady, L., & Kennedy, K. (2003). Curriculum construction (2nd ed.). Sydney: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. R. (1997). Managing systematic curriculum change: A critical analysis of Hong Kong’s target-oriented curriculum initiative. International Review of Education, 43(4), 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Mannion, L., & Morrison, K. (2004). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V., & Jones, A. (1998). Reflecting on teacher development in technology education: Implications for future programmes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1992). Curriculum stability and change. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum. American Educational Research Association New York: MacMillan.

  • Curriculum Corporation (1994). A Statement on technology for Australian schools. Carlton: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custer, R. L. (1995). Examining the dimensions of technology. International Journal of Design and Technology Education, 5(3), 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland (2003a). Getting started. Queensland: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Queensland (2003b). Technology snap shot. Queensland: Curriculum Strategy Branch, Education Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, H. B., & English, A. C. (1958). A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytic terms. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, G., Adams-Jones, D., & Vickers, C. (2002). Teaching technology—design briefs and rich tasks: Contradictions and challenges facing future teachers. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Conference on Technology Education Research, Learning in Technology Education: Challenges for the 21st Century, December 2002, pp. 120–127. Gold Coast: Centre for Technology Education Research, Griffith University.

  • Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Houguet, B. (2004). Researching school change in technology education. Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Learning for Innovation in Technology Education, December 2004 (Vol. 1, pp. 189–198). Gold Coast: Centre for Learning Research, Griffith University.

  • Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Houguet, B. (2005). Teaching technology: From intention to implementation—the story so far. Gold Coast: Centre for Learning Research, Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (2000). Working technologically: Investigations into how young children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M., & Jane, B. (1999). Technology for children: Developing your own approach. Australia: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, I. S., McRobbie, C. J., Norton, S. J., & Davis, R. S. (2004). Perceptions of curriculum implementation needs in design and technology. Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Learning for Innovation in Technology Education, December 2004 (Vol. 1, pp. 210–218). Gold Coast: Centre for Learning Research, Griffith University.

  • Hill, A. M. (1997). Reconstructionism in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem solving in real-life contexts: An alternative for design in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1).

  • Houguet, B. (2005). The implementation of technology education: Intrinsic and extrinsic challenges for primary teachers. Unpublished Bachelor of Education (Primary) Honours Thesis. Queensland, Australia: Faculty of Education, Griffith University.

  • Jones, A., Harlow, A., & Cowie, B. (2004). New Zealand teachers’ experiences in implementing the technology curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (1999). Ways of knowing: Researching literacy. Newton: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, B. (2004). “Are you saying I’m to blame?” Exploring the influence of a principal on elementary science delivery. Research in Science Education, 34(2), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, B., & Fisher, D. (2004). The application of a primary science delivery evaluation questionnaire. Research in Science Education, 34, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. M. (1999). Two teachers’ conceptions of a reform-oriented curriculum: Implications for mathematics teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2, 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond ‘the design process’: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, C. (2004). Action research and technology education. The Technology Teacher, 63(8), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2003a). Technology years 1 to 10 syllabus. Queensland: QSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2003b). Technology years 1 to 10 initial in-service materials. Queensland: QSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2003c). Technology years 1 to 10 sourcebook guidelines. Queensland: QSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA) (2006). About the Queensland studies authority. Retrieved 26 May, 2006, from the World Wide Web: http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/qsa/index.html.

  • Raizen, S. A. (1997). Making way for technology education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, V., Ankiewicz, P., de Swardt, E., & Gross, E. (2003). The essential features of technology and technology education: A conceptual framework for the development of OBE (outcomes based education) related programs in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J. (2001). Teacher collaboration in curriculum change: The implementation of technology education in the primary school. Research in Science Education, 31, 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (2001). Science teaching and learning in Australian schools: Results of a national study. Research in Science Education, 31, 455–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sade, D., & Coll, R. K. (2003). Technology and technology education: Views of some Solomon Island primary teachers and curriculum development officers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stables, K. (1997). Critical Issues to consider when introducing technology education into the curriculum of young learners. Journal of Technology Education, 8(2).

  • Stein, S. J., Ginns, I. S., & McRobbie, C. J. (2002). An integrated approach to describing technology education classrooms. Paper presented at the 2nd Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Learning in Technology Education: Challenges for the 21st Century, December 2002 (Vol. 2, pp. 192–201). Gold Coast: Centre for Technology Education Research, Griffith University.

  • Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. (2000). Recognising uniqueness in the technology key learning area: The search for meaning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, S. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2001). Authentic program planning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 239–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Technology Education Federation of Australia (2005). A statement on technology for Australian schools. Retrieved 12 September, 2005, from the World Wide Web: http://www.pa.ash.org.au/tefa/wite.html.

  • Treagust, D. F., & Rennie, L. J. (1993). Implementing technology in the school curriculum: A case study involving six secondary schools. Journal of Technology Education, 5(1).

  • Upper Coomera State College (2005). Chisholm junior school enrolment package. Gold Coast: UCSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publicayions.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

    Glenn Finger

  2. Pimpama State School, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

    Belinda Houguet

Authors
  1. Glenn Finger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Belinda Houguet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn Finger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finger, G., Houguet, B. Insights into the intrinsic and extrinsic challenges for implementing technology education: case studies of Queensland teachers. Int J Technol Des Educ 19, 309–334 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9044-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-007-9044-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation