Skip to main content
Log in

An exploratory study on the perspectives of prospective computer teachers following project-based learning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates perceptions of 29 prospective teachers about a course based on Project-Based Learning (PBL) approach. The course, ‘Authoring Languages in PC Environment (B-320)’ lasted in 14 weeks in fall semester of 2004–2005. In this course each prospective teacher carried out a project that requires designing and developing courseware individually. This study is qualitative in nature and data were collected through an open ended questionnaire composed of seven items and analyzed by content analysis technique. The results show that prospective teachers found PBL as an effective way of learning. It also suggests that when efficient guidance about technical issues and time management is provided, PBL approach can be successfully implemented in computer related courses such as programming language and web designing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arends, R. I. (2001). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Humanities, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J., & Kahn, J. (2003). Research in education (9th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to teory and methods. Allyn & Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Celik, S., Senocak, E., Bayrakceken, S., Taskesenligil, Y., & Doymus, K. (2005). Aktif öğrenme stratejileri üzerine bir derleme çalışması (A Review on Active Learning Strategies). Journal of Kazim Karabekir Education Faculty, 11, 155–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Development Center, (2003). Promising practices in Project-based learning at ctcs. Retrieved March 12 2004 from http://www.america connects.net/ research/PBL.pdf

  • Fleming, D. S. (2000). A teacher’s guide to project-based learning, ERIC Database, ED469734

  • Frank, M., Lavy, I., & Elata, D. (2003). Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginestié, J. (2002). The industrial project method in French industry and in French schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 99–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. M. (1998). Project-based-learning: moving students toward meaningful learning, ERIC Database, ED422466

  • Hill, A. M. (1997). Reconstructionism in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem solving in real-life contexts: an alternative for design in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 203–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhl, L., Yearsley, K., & Silva, A. J. (1997). Interdisciplinary project-based learning through an environmental water quality. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(12), 14–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., & Hsiao, Y. P. (2002). Middle school students as multimedia designers: A project-based learning approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 311–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science: Challenges for practice and policy. Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 341–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcmillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. E. & Treagust D. F. (2003). Engineering education – is problem-based or project-based learnıng the answer? Australian Journal of Engineering Education, 4, Retrieved February 07 2004 from http://www.aaee.com.au/ journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf

  • National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Senocak, E., Taskesenligil, Y. & Sozbilir, M. (2006). A study on teaching gases to prospective primary science teachers through problem-based learning. Research in Science Education (in press). DOI 10.1007/s1116500690265.

  • Share, E., & Rogers, L. (1997). Get real! project-based learning. Learning, 25(4), 61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: A primer. Technology & Learning, 23(6), 20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Retrieved March 1 2004 from http://www.bobpearlman.org/ BestPractices/ PBL_Research.pdf

  • Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J. R., & Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning handbook for middle and high school teachers. Buck Institute for Education, Novato CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, K., & Duffrin, M. W. (2003). Utilizing project-based learning and competition to develop student skills and interest in producing quality food items. Journal of Food Science Education, 2, 69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştirma yöntemleri (Qualitative research methods in social sciences) (5th ed.). Seckin Publication, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, Z. (2005). Hypermedia as a cognitive tool: Student teachers’ experiences in learning by doing. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 107–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suat Celik.

Appendix I—Open ended questions

Appendix I—Open ended questions

  1. 1.

    Which challenge(s) did you experience during project work for “Authoring Languages in PC Environment “course according to you? How can those be overcome?

  2. 2.

    Would you want same teaching approach to be used in other course you will enroll?

  3. 3.

    What else could be done to improve project work? Please explain your answer?

  4. 4.

    When you become a teacher, will you use project based approach in your course as in this course? If your answer is yes, what will you do different activities from we did in this course?

  5. 5.

    Do you think you have really learnt using Macromedia Authorware? Please explain which factor affected your learning level?

  6. 6.

    What kind of skills do you think you acquire except using macromedia Authorware?

  7. 7.

    Have you got knowledge and skills which you can use in your professional life? Please explain your answer?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karaman, S., Celik, S. An exploratory study on the perspectives of prospective computer teachers following project-based learning. Int J Technol Des Educ 18, 203–215 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9021-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9021-1

Keywords

Navigation