Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Technology Education as Solo Activity or Socially Constructed Learning

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a continuing perception that current educational arrangements for technology education in modern liberal democracies are at odds with its actual delivery in the classroom (Dakers & Doherty 2003). The ‘technè versus poiesis’ tension (explained later) is one major contributor to this perception. Equally, the practice of ‘transmission versus constructivist’ pedagogies contributes to the mismatch between policy and practice.

This paper will investigate how factors relating to these two contributions affect the delivery of technological education. It will begin by discussing the derivation of the word ‘technology’ and how its modern incarnation has become not only amorphous, but confusing for technology education, in that the term can be taken to mean production on the one hand or process on the other. It will then explore technology teachers’ perceptions (and misperceptions) of what constitutes technology education, and discuss why this can lead to confusion. It will further consider how this can affect the pedagogy adopted. It will then examine two pedagogical frameworks which result from teachers’ perceptions of technology education as either; a process of internalisation of technological skills and functions as representations exclusively within the mind and unique to the individual, thus solo, or; a process of technological skills and functions embedded in sociocultural activity in which cognition is distributed across the internal mind and the external environment. Finally, the paper will offer a framework for the delivery of technology education set within a ‘community of learners’ paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • C. Ames (1992) ArticleTitle‘Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation’ Journal of Educational Psychology 84 IssueID3 261–271

    Google Scholar 

  • M. W. Apple J. A. Bean (1999) Democratic Schools: Lessons from the chalk face Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Barab T. M. Duffy (2000) ‘From Practice Fields to Communities of Practice’ D. H. Jonassen S. M. Land (Eds) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments Lawrence Erlbaum Associates New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Barlex (2003) Creativity in Crisis. Design and Technology at KS3 and KS4 Design and Technology Association Warwickshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Bauman (2003) The individualised society Polity, Blackwell publishing Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Benne, K. & Birbaum, M.: 1978, Teaching and Learning about Science and Social Policy . Boulder CO, USA: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education/Social Science Education Consortium.

  • J. S. Brown A. Collins P. Duguid (1989) ArticleTitle‘Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning Educational Researcher 18 IssueID1 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bruner (1996) The Culture of Education Harvard University Press Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Cole (1996) Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., Wertsch, J. V. (no date). Beyond the Individual-Social Antimony in Discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. www.prometheus.org.uk/Files/ColeAndWertschOnPiagetAndVygotsky. pdf, Accessed 22 September 2004.

  • Conference: 1868, Conference on Technical Education Held at Edinburgh, Friday 20th March 1868. Neiland Company, Edinburgh. (Publication held in University of Glasgow Special Collection, BG 57c. 17).

  • J. Dakers (2004a) ArticleTitleA Comparison Between Current Initiatives to Promote Science and Technology Education in Sweden and the Aspirations for Scotland The Scottish Educational Review, Dundee 36 IssueID2 206–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakers, J.: 2004b, The introduction of Practical Craft Skills into the Scottish Technology Curriculum: A new beginning or the beginning of the end?A reply to my critics.In E. W. L. Norman, David Spendlove, Peter Grover, Andy Mitchell (eds.), Creativity and Innovation: Conference book. DATA International Research and UK Education Conference Book, pp. 35–40.

  • J. Dakers R. Doherty (2003) Technology Education T. Bryce W. Humes (Eds) Scottish Education Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh 611–616

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dakers W. Dow (2004) ArticleTitle‘The Problem with Transition in Technology Education: A Scottish perspective’ The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 9 IssueID2 116–124

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE.: 2004, The National Curriculum Online: Design and Technology. http://www.nc.uk.net/index.html (Accessed 04 March 2004).

  • Dow, W.: 2004, ‘The Role of Implicit Theories in the Development of Creative Classrooms’, in E. W. L. Norman, D. Spendlove, P. Grover & A. Mitchell (eds.), Creativity and Innovation: Conference book. DATA International Research and UK Education Conference Book. pp. 61–66.

  • C. S. Dweck (1999) Self Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development Psychology Press Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J.: 1964, The Technological Society Vintage books, New York.

  • Y. Engeström R. Miettinen R. Punamäki (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory Cambridge University Press New York/Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Feenberg (2002) Transforming Technology Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouet, J-M. & Nouira, R.: 1995, Acquisition and Structuration of Knowledge Using Metaknowledge, IJCAI’95 ( International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligences).Workshop on Machine Learning, Montreal, Canada, August. http://bat710.univ-lyon1.fr/∼fouet/Wbienvenue.html (accessed 17 September 2004)

  • Hansen, J. W. & Lovedahl, G. G.: 2004, ‘Developing Technology Teachers: Questioning the Industrial Tool Use Model’, Journal of Technology Education 15:2. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v15n2/hansen.html (accessed 16 October 2004).

  • Harlen, W. & Holroyd, C.: 1996, ‘Primary Teachers’ Understanding of Concepts in Science and Technology. Interchange No. 34. Research and Intelligence Unit.

  • Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, San Fransisco. Harper and Row.

  • ITEA.: 2000, Standards for Technological Literacy. Content for the Study of Technology. International Technology Education Association, Virginia.

  • R. Kimbell (1997) Assessing Technology: International Trends in Curriculum and Assessment OU press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kimbell D. Perry (2001) Design and Technology in a Knowledge Economy Engineering Council London

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kroker (2004) The Will of Technology & the Culture of Nihilism University of Toronto Press Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kuhn (1991) The Skills of Argument Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lave (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday life Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lave (1993) ‘Situated Learning in Communities of Practice’ L. B. Resnick J. M. Levine S. D. Teasley (Eds) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition American Psychological Association Washington 17–36

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lemke (1997) ‘Cognition, Context and Learning. A social semiotic perspective’ D. Krishner J. A. Whitson (Eds) Situated Cognition, Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives Lawrence Erlbaum Associates New Jersey 37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Matusov (1998) ArticleTitle‘When Solo Activity is not Privileged: Participation and Internalisation Models of Development Human Development. Karger 41 326–349

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Mayor (1992) Cognition and Instruction: their historic meaning within educational psychology. Jounal of Educational psychology A.F. Ashman R.N.F. Conway (Eds) An Introduction to Cognitive Education Routledge New York 405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mead (1964) Continuities in Cultural Evolution Yale University Press New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Mumford (1934) Technics and Civilization Harcourt Brace & Company San Deigo

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Murphy J. Potts (2003) Culture and Technology PalgraveMacMillan New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NZCF: 2004, Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum. http://www.minedu.govt.nz/web/downloadable/dl3614_v1/tech-nzc.pdf (Accessed 04 March 2004).

  • Peters, M. A. 2002, National Education Policy Constructions of the ‘Knowledge Economy: Towards a Critique, Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(1), 2001.

  • L. B. Resnick (1987) ArticleTitle‘Learning in school and out’ Education Researcher, 16 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobek, II, D. K.: 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society of Engineering Education Conference. Available at www.coe.montana.edu/IE/faculty/sobek/ASEE01ERM.doc (Accessed 17 September 2004).

  • SCCC: 1996, Technology Education in Scottish Schools. A Statement of Position from Scottish CCC. Scotish Consultative Council on the Curriculum. Dundee.

  • P. Senge (1994) The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook. Stratagies and tools for building a learning organisation Doubleday New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Staudenmaier (1985) Technology’s Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric Society for the History of Technology and the M.I.T. Press Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Sternberg W.M. Williams (2002) Educational Psychology Allyn & Bacon Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Volti (2001) Society and Technological Change EditionNumber4 Worth Publishers New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L. S. Vygotsky (1978) Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes Harvard University Press Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Walkerdine (1997) ‘Redefining the subject in situated cognition theory’ D. Krishner J. A. Whitson (Eds) Situated Cognition, Social, Semiotic, and Psychological perspectives Lawrence Erlbaum Associates New Jersey 57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Wenger (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning Meaning and Identity Cabridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Williams (1996) ‘Philosophy of Technology Education’ J. Williams A. Williams (Eds) Technology Education for Teachers MacMillan Education Australia Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Winner (1977) Autonomous technology: Technics-Out-of-Control as a theme in political thought MIT Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Studies, University of Glasgow, II Eldon Street, Glasgow, G3 6 NH, UK

    John Dakers

Authors
  1. John Dakers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Dakers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dakers, J. Technology Education as Solo Activity or Socially Constructed Learning. Int J Technol Des Educ 15, 73–89 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-6196-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-6196-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation