Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate tax policy and incorporation in the EU

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Europe, declining corporate tax rates have come along with rising tax-to-GDP ratios. This paper explores to what extent income shifting from the personal to the corporate tax base can explain these diverging developments. We exploit a panel of European data on legal form of business to analyze income shifting via incorporation. The results suggest that the effect is significant and large. It implies that the revenue effects of lower corporate tax rates—possibly induced by tax competition—will partly show up in lower personal tax revenues rather than lower corporate tax revenues. Simulations suggest that between 12% and 21% of corporate tax revenue can be attributed to income shifting. Income shifting is found to have raised the corporate tax-to-GDP ratio by some 0.25% points since the early 1990s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alstadsæter, A. (2003). The dual income tax and firms’ income shifting through the choice of organizational form and real capital investments. CESifo working paper, no. 1018.

  • Auerbach, A. (2007). Why have corporate tax revenues declined? Another look. CESifo Economic Studies, 53(2), 153–171. doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifm008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., & Fuest, C. (2007). Globalisation generates higher corporate tax revenues. ETPF research paper.

  • De Angelo, H., De Angelo, L., & Skinner, D. J. (2004). Are dividends disappearing? Dividend concentration and the consolidation of earnings. Journal of Financial Economics, 72, 425–456. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00186-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mooij, R. A. (2005). Will corporate income taxation survive? De Economist, 153, 277–301. doi:10.1007/s10645-005-1989-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., & Klemm, A. (2002). Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition. Economic Policy, 35, 451–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., & Klemm, A. (2004). Why has the UK corporate tax raised so much revenue. IFS working paper 04/04.

  • Fuest, C., & Weichenrieder, A. (2002). Tax competition and profit shifting: on the relationship between personal and corporate tax rates. Ifo Studien: Zeitschrift fur Empirische Wirtshaftsforschung, 48, 611–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, A. (1998). Taxes, organizational form and the deadweight loss of the corporate income tax. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 143–152. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00009-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee, A. (2004). The impact of the corporate income tax: evidence from state organizational form data. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2283–2299. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. H., & MacKie-Mason, J. (1994). Tax distortions to the choice of organizational form. Journal of Public Economics, 55, 279–306. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(94)90055-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. H., & Slemrod, J. (2000). Are “real” responses to taxes simply income shifting between corporate and personal tax bases? In J. Slemrod (Ed.), Does Atlas Shrug? The economic consequences of taxing the rich (pp. 240–280). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., & Klemm, A. (2004). What has been the tax competition experience for the last 20 years? IFS Working Paper 04/05.

  • Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (Vol. 1, pp. 221–223). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKie-Mason, J. K., & Gordon, R. H. (1997). How much do taxes discourage incorporation? The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 477–505. doi:10.2307/2329487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicodème, G. (2007). Corporate tax competition and coordination in the European Union: what do we know? Where do we stand? In C. Read & G. N. Gregoriou (Eds.), International taxation handbook (pp. 171–208). London: Elsevier, chap. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrör, H. (2005). Business demography in Europe: results from 1997 to 2002. Statistics in Focus, 36, Eurostat.

  • Sørensen, P. B. (2007). Can capital income taxes survive? And should they? CESifo Economic Studies, 53(2), 172–228 doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifm010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Eije, H., & Megginson, W. (2006). Dividend policy in the European Union. Mimeo, University of Oklahoma.

  • Weichenrieder, A. J. (2005). (Why) do we need corporate taxation? CESifo working paper, no. 1495.

  • White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–830. doi:10.2307/1912934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007). Doing business database.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaëtan Nicodème.

Additional information

This research was carried out while Ruud de Mooij was a visiting fellow at DG ECFIN in October 2006. The views expressed in this Article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the European Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Mooij, R.A., Nicodème, G. Corporate tax policy and incorporation in the EU. Int Tax Public Finance 15, 478–498 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9072-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9072-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation