Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

We analyze the topical question of how the compensation of elected politicians affects the set of citizens choosing to run. To this end, we develop a sparse and tractable citizen-candidate model of representative democracy with ability differences, informative campaigning and political parties. Our results suggest that primaries, campaign costs and rewards have previously overlooked interactions that should be studied in a unified framework. Surprisingly, increasing the reward may lower the average candidate quality when the campaigning costs are sufficiently high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R. (1973). The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model. Public Choice, 14, 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (2004). Paying Politicians: Theory and Evidence. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T.,&Coate, S. (1997). An Economic Model of Representative Democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilodeau, M.,&Slivinski, Al. (1996). Toilet Cleaning and Department Chairing: Volunteering a Public Service. Journal of Public Economics, 59, 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C.,&Nalebuff, B. (1984). Dragon Slaying and Ballroom Dancing: The Private Supply of a Public Good. Journal of Public Economics, 25, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud, B.,&Tirole, J. (2002). Parties as Political Intermediaries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1453–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, J. D.,&Mariotti, T. (2001). Electoral Competition and Politician Turnover. European Economic Review, 45, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselli, F.,&Morelli, M. (2004). Bad Politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 759–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A. (2000). Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice, 50, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersbach, H. (2004). Competition of Politicians for Incentive Contracts and Elections. Public Choice, 121, 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersbach, H.,&Liessem, V. (2001). Reelection Threshold Contracts in Politics. CESifo Working Paper No. 622.

  • Holmström, B. (1982). Managerial Incentive Problem—A Dynamic Perspective. In Essays in economics and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Swedish School of Economics: Helsinki. Reprinted in Review of Economic Studies, (1999) 66, 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M.&Polborn, M. K. (2004). Paying Politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2423–2445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye Jr.,&Joseph S. (2002). Put Some Polish on Government Service. The Washington Post, Op-ed on August 21, 2001.

  • Osborne, M. J.,&Slivinski, A. (1996). A Model of Political Competition with Citizen Candidates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 65–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T.,&Tabellini, G. (2000). Political economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutvaara, P. (2003). Party Platforms with Endogenous Party Membership. Public Choice, 117, 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prat, A. (2002). Campaign Advertising and Voter Welfare. Review of Economic Studies, 69, 999–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles. American Economic Review, 80, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K.,&Sibert, A. (1988). Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles. Review of Economic Studies, 55, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, C. (2003). Strategic campaigns and Redistributive Politics. Mimeo, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panu Poutvaara.

Additional information

JEL Classification D70 · D72 · D79

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poutvaara, P., Takalo, T. Candidate quality. Int Tax Public Finan 14, 7–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-6691-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-6691-2

Keywords

Navigation