Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge-based clinical pathway for medical quality improvement

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical pathways have been adopted for various diseases in clinical departments for quality improvement as a result of standardization of medical activities in treatment process. Using knowledge-based decision support on the basis of clinical pathways is a promising strategy to improve medical quality effectively. However, the clinical pathway knowledge has not been fully integrated into treatment process and thus cannot provide comprehensive support to the actual work practice. Therefore this paper proposes a knowledge-based clinical pathway management method which contributes to make use of clinical knowledge to support and optimize medical practice. We have developed a knowledge-based clinical pathway management system to demonstrate how the clinical pathway knowledge comprehensively supports the treatment process. The experiences from the use of this system show that the treatment quality can be effectively improved by the extracted and classified clinical pathway knowledge, seamless integration of patient-specific clinical pathway recommendations with medical tasks and the evaluating pathway deviations for optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A hospital information system (HIS), is a comprehensive, integrated information system designed to manage the administrative and financial aspects of a hospital. Clinical information systems (CISs) are sometimes separated from HISs in that the former concentrate on patient-related and clinical-state-related data (electronic patient record) whereas the latter keeps track of administrative issues.

References

  • Andrew, P. S., & William, B. R. (1999). Information systems frontiers in knowledge management. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(3), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barjis, J., Gupta, A., & Sharda, R. (2010). Knowledge work and communication challenges in networked enterprises. Information Systems Frontiers. doi:10.1007/s10796-010-9240-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaser, R., Schnabel, M., Biber, C., Baumlein, M., Heger, O., Beyer, M., et al. (2007). Improving pathway compliance and clinician performance by using information technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S. (2001). Computerised clinical pathway as process quality improvement tool. Studies in health technology and informatics, 84(Pt 2), 1135–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuggia, M., Rossille, D., Arnault, A., Bouget, J., & Le Beux, P. (2007). Towards a decision support system for optimising clinical pathways of elderly patients in an emergency department. Paper presented at the Medinfo 2007: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics; Building Sustainable Health Systems, Amsterdam.

  • Darden, L. (2002). Strategies for discovering mechanisms: schema instantiation, modular subassembly, forward/backward chaining. Philosophy of Science, 69, S354–S365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, productivity & competitive position. New York: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eige, K. (2004). Clinical pathway compliance and quality improvement. Nursing standard, 18, 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, R. B., & Connelly, D. P. (1995). Computerized decision support systems in primary care. Prim Care, 22, 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlin, J., Dexter, P. R., & Overhage, J. M. (2007). Details of a successful clinical decision support system. Paper presented at the AMIA Annual Symposium

  • Grimshaw, J. M., & Russell, I. T. (1993). Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. The Lancet, 342(8883), 1317–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, K. F., & Abidi, S. S. R. (2007). Ontology engineering to model clinical pathways: towards the computerization and execution of clinical pathways. Paper presented at CBMS ’07: Proceedings of the Twentieth IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Maribor, Slovenia.

  • Johnston, M. E., Langton, K. B., Haynes, R. B., & Mathieu, A. (1994). Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome: a critical appraisal of research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, K. A., Lenz, R., Elstner, T., Siegele, H., & Moll, R. (2003). Experiences with a generator tool for building clinical application modules. Methods Information in Medicine, 42, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, R., & Kuhn, K. A. (2004). Towards a continuous evolution and adaptation of information systems in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, R., & Reichert, M. (2005). It support for healthcare processes. In B. B. W. van der Aalst, F. Casati, & F. Curbera (Eds.), Business process management (pp. 354–363). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Liu, K., Li, S., & Yang, H. (2008). Normative modeling for personalized clinical pathway using organizational semiotics methods. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Computer Science and Computational Technology, Shanghai, China.

  • Li, W., Liu, K., Li, S., & Yang, H. (2009). An agent based approach for customized clinical pathway. Paper presented at the 2009 International Forum on Information Technology and Applications, Chengdu, China.

  • Li, W., Liu, K., Li, S., & Yang, H. (2010). A semiotic multi-agent modeling approach for clinical pathway management. Journal of Computers, 5(2), 266–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobach, D. F., Kawamoto, K., Anstrom, K. J., Russell, M. L., Woods, P., & Smith, D. (2007). Development, deployment and usability of a point-of-care decision support system for chronic disease management using the recently-approved hl7 decision support service standard. Studies in health technology and informatics, 129(Pt 2), 861–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luc, K. D., & Todd, J. (2003). E-pathways: Computers and the patient’s journey through care. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathe, J. L., Martin, J. B., Miller, A., Lédeczi, Á., Weavind, L. M., Nadas, A., et al. (2009). A model-integrated, guideline-driven, clinical decision-support system. IEEE Software, 26(4), 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maviglia, S. M., Zielstorff, R. D., Paterno, M., Teich, J. M., Bates, D. W., & Kuperman, G. J. (2003). Automating complex guidelines for chronic disease: lessons learned. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, J. (2000). Quality meets process improvement. Management Services, 44(5), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein, A. H. (1999). Inpatient clinical decision support systems: determining the roi. Health Financial Management, 53(2), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, W. E., & Gibney, R. (1997). End-stage renal disease: a proving ground for quality improvement in health care. Seminars in Nephrology, 17(3), 218–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakofsky, S. (1996). Solving the corrective action dilemma. Journal for Quality & Participation, 19(6), 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman, R. N., Liaw, Y., Brandt, C. A., & Corb, G. J. (1999). Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 6, 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakamiya, S., & Yamauchi, K. (2009). What are the standard functions of electronic clinical pathways? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 543–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H., & Li, W. (2009). Modeling requirement driven architecture of adaptive healthcare system based on semiotics. Paper presented at the International Forum on Information Technology and Applications (IFITA), Chengdu, China.

  • Yang, H., & Li, W. (2009). An ontology-based approach for data integration in regionally interoperable healthcare systems. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, Beijing, China.

  • Yang, H., Liu, K., & Li, W. (2010). Adaptive requirement-driven architecture for integrated healthcare systems. Journal of Computers, 5(2), 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasnoff, W. A., & Miller, P. L. (2003). Decision support and expert systems in public health. In Public health informatics and information systems (pp. 494–512). New York: Springer.

  • Zielstorff, R. D. (1998). Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weizi Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, H., Li, W., Liu, K. et al. Knowledge-based clinical pathway for medical quality improvement. Inf Syst Front 14, 105–117 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-011-9307-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-011-9307-z

Keywords

Navigation