Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Taxonomy, technology and applications of smart objects

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deployment of embedded technologies is increasingly being examined in industrial supply chains as a means for improving efficiency through greater control over purchase orders, inventory and product related information. Central to this development has been the advent of technologies such as bar codes, Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems, and wireless sensors which when attached to a product, form part of the product’s embedded systems infrastructure. The increasing integration of these technologies dramatically contributes to the evolving notion of a “smart product”, a product which is capable of incorporating itself into both physical and information environments. The future of this revolution in objects equipped with smart embedded technologies is one in which objects can not only identify themselves, but can also sense and store their condition, communicate with other objects and distributed infrastructures, and take decisions related to managing their life cycle. The object can essentially “plug” itself into a compatible systems infrastructure owned by different partners in a supply chain. However, as in any development process that will involve more than one end user, the establishment of a common foundation and understanding is essential for interoperability, efficient communication among involved parties and for developing novel applications. In this paper, we contribute to creating that common ground by providing a characterization to aid the specification and construction of “smart objects” and their underlying technologies. Furthermore, our work provides an extensive set of examples and potential applications of different categories of smart objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armenio, F., et al. (2007). The EPC global architecture framework, resource document. EPCglobal, http://www.epcglobalinc.org/standards/architecture/architecture_1_2-framework-20070910.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • Batalin, M. A., & Sukhatme, G. S. (2002). Sensor coverage using mobile robots and stationary nodes. In Proceedings of scalability and traffic control in IP networks 2002, 31 July 2002 (Vol. 4868, pp. 269–276). Boston, USA.

  • Caruso, M. J., & Withanawasam, L. S. (1999). Vehicle detection and compass applications using AMR magnetic sensors. Resource document, Honeywell technical documentation. www.magneticsensors.com/datasheets/amr.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • Castillo-Effer, M., Quintela, D. H., Moreno, W., Jordan, R., & Westhoff, W. (2004). Wireless sensor networks for flash-flood alerting. In Proceedings of the fifth IEEE international caracas conference on devices, circuits and systems, 3–5 November 2004 (pp. 142–146). Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.

  • Cayirci, E., Tezcan, H., Dogan, Y., & Coskun, V. (2004). Wireless sensor networks for underwater surveillance systems. Elsevier Journal on Ad-hoc Networks, 4(4), 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, C. O. (2005). Growers sow the seeds of success. Resource document. RFID journal online. http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/1513/. Accessed 30 October 2008.

  • Duarte, M., & Hu, Y.-H. (2004). Vehicle classification in distributed sensor networks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 64(7), 826–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, G. L., Gilbert, D. C., & Barger, J. E. (1997). Acoustic counter-sniper system. In: Proceedings of SPIE international symposium on enabling technologies for law enforcement and security, 19 November (p. 262). Boston, USA.

  • Dutta, P., Grimmer, M., Arora, A., Bibyk, S., & Culler, D. (2005). Design of a wireless sensor network platform for detecting rare, random, and ephemeral events. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on information processing in sensor networks, 25–27 April (Article no. 70). Los Angeles, USA.

  • Edwards, J. (2007). Cold chain heats up RFID adoption. Resource document. RFID journal online. http://www.rfidjournal.com/magazine/article/3243/6/417/. Accessed 30 October 2007.

  • Emery, K. (2005). Distributed eventing architecture: RFID and sensors in a supply chain. MPhil thesis, MIT University.

  • EPCglobal Inc (2005). Class 1 generation 2 UHF air interface protocol standard version 1.0.9: ‘Gen 2’. Resource document. EPCglobal. http://www.epcglobalinc.org/standards/uhfc1g2/uhfc1g2_1_2_0-standard-20080511.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • EPCglobal Inc (2005). EPC TM tag data standards. Resource document. EPCglobal. http://www.epcglobalinc.org/standards/tds/tds_1_4-standard-20080611.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • EPCglobal Inc (2007). EPCglobal tag class definitions. Resource document. EPCglobal. http://www.epcglobalinc.org/standards/TagClassDefinitions_1_0-whitepaper-20071101.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • European Parliament (2002). Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Communities, L31/1L31/24.

  • Gilbert, A. (2004). HP developing ‘smart rack’ to ease data center work. Resource document. CNET news. http://news.cnet.com/HP-developing-smart-rack-to-ease-data-center-work/2100-1012_3-5432481.html. Accessed 30 October 2008.

  • IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (2006). 802.15.4, specific requirements Part 15.4: Wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (WPANs). Resource document. IEEE Computer Society. http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.15.4-2006.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • ISO/ICE (2006). Information technology –radio frequency identification (RFID) for item management application protocol: Encoding and processing rules for sensors and batteries. Technical document draft, ISO/ IEC WD 24753.

  • ISO/IEC (2007). Information technology –radio frequency identification for item management—part6: Parameters for air interface communications at 860MHz to 960MHz. Technical document, Working draft, ISO/ IEC WD 18000-6REV1.

  • Kevan, T. (2004). Theft and terror threats push sensors into supply chain. Resource document. Frontline Solutions. http://www.sensitech.com/PDFs/coldchain_info/Frontline_Solutions.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2008.

  • Kim, S., Pakzad, S., Culler, D., Demmel, J., Fenves, G., Glaser, S., et al. (2006). Wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on embedded networked sensor systems, 31 October–3 November 2006 (pp. 4270-428). Boulder, USA.

  • Konstantas, D., van Halteren, A. T., Bults, R. G. A., Wac, K. E., Jones, V. M., & Widya, I. A. (2004). Body area networks for ambulant patient monitoring over next generation public wireless networks. In Thirteenth IST mobile and wireless communications summit, 27–30 June 2004 (pp. 181–185). Lyon, France.

  • Kuck, M. (2007). The chill-on project: Novel technologies for a safe and transparent food supply. Resource online. http://www.chill-on.com/. Accessed 30 October 2008.

  • LandMarc Research Center (2007). Integrated sensor radio frequency identification (ISRFID). http://landmarc.gtri.gatech.edu. Accessed 15 April 2007.

  • Lee, K. (1999). A synopsis of the IEEE P1451- standards for smart transducer communication. Resource document. National Institute of Standards and Technology. ieee1451.nist.gov/1451synosis-599F.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • Levis, P. (2006). TinyOS 2.0 overview. Resource document. http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/overview.html. Accessed 20 October 2008.

  • Li, G-H., Zhao, J., & Wang Z. (2006). Research on forest fire detection based on wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the WCICA 2006, 21–23 June 2006 (275–279). Dalian China.

  • Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Culler, D., & Anderson, J. (2002). Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In Proceedings of the WSNA’02, 28 September 2002 (pp. 88–97). Atlanta, Georgia.

  • McFarlane, D. C., Sarma, S. E., Chirn, J. L., Wong, C. Y., & Ashton, K. (2002). The intelligent product in manufacturing control. Journal of EAIA, 54–64.

  • Mitsugi, J., Inaba, T., Patkai, B., Theodorou, L., Sung, J., Sanchez Lopez, T., et al. (2007). Architecture development for sensor integration in the EPCglobal network. Auto-ID Labs White Paper, White Paper Series 2007.

  • Nochta, Z., Oertel, N., & Spiess, P. (2005). Relocatable services and service classification scheme. Resource document. Project CoVIs. http://www.cobis-online.de/files/Deliverable_D101.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • Patkai, B., Theodorou, L., McFarlane, D., & Schmidt, K. (2007). Requirements for RFID-based sensor integration in landing gear monitoring—a case study. Technical report, AerospaceID Technologies Programme, University of Cambridge.

  • Ranasinghe, D. C., & Cole, P. H. (2008). Networked RFID systems. In Networked RFID systems and lightweight cryptography: Raising barriers to product counterfeiting (pp. 45–58). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberti, M. (2004a). BP leads the way on sensors. Resource document. RFID journal online. http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/1216/1/2. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • Roberti, M. (2004b). Navy revs up RFID sensors. Resource document. RFID journal online. http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/view/990/1/1. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • Ruhanen, A., et al. (2008). Sensor-enabled RFID tag handbook. Resource document. BRIDGE project. http://www.bridge-project.eu/data/File/BRIDGE_WP01_RFID_tag_handbook.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2009.

  • Sample, A. P., Yeager, D. J., Powledge, P. S., Mamishev, A. V., & Smith, J. R. (2008). Design of an RFID-based battery-free programmable sensing platform. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 57(11), 2608–2615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sha, K., Shi, K., & Watkins, O. (2006). Using wireless sensor networks for fire rescue applications: Requirements and challenges. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE international conference on electro/information technology, 7–10 May (pp. 239–244). East Lansing, USA.

  • Srini, V. P. (2006). A vision for supporting autonomous navigation in urban environments. IEEE Computer, 39(12), 68–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoianov, I., Nachman, L., Madden, S., & Tokmouline T. (2007). PIPENET A wireless sensor network for pipeline monitoring. In Proceedings of the information processing in sensor networks 2007, 25–27 April (pp. 264-273). Cambridge, USA.

  • Theodorou, S. (2006). A classification approach for RFID-based sensor integration. A thesis for the degree of Master of Philosophy, Hughes Hall, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge.

  • Welsh, M. (2005). CodeBlue: A wireless sensor network for medical care and disaster response. Resource document. http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~mdw/talks/ucsd-codeblue.pdf. Accessed October 30 2008.

  • Wong, C. Y., McFarlane, D., Zaharudin, A. H., & Agarwal, V. (2002). The intelligent product driven supply chain. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, 6–9 October (Vol. 4, 6 p.).

  • Yoo, S., Kim, J., Kim, T., Ahn, S., Sung, J., & Kim, D. (2007). A2S: Automated Agriculture system based on WSN. In Proceedings of the ISCE2007, 20–23 Jun (pp. 628–633). Dallas, Texas.

  • ZigBee Alliance (2006). ZigBee specification. Technical document 05347r13.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Department, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge, CB2 1RX, UK

    Tomás Sánchez López, Bela Patkai & Duncan McFarlane

  2. The School of Computer Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia

    Damith Chinthana Ranasinghe

Authors
  1. Tomás Sánchez López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Damith Chinthana Ranasinghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bela Patkai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Duncan McFarlane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomás Sánchez López.

Additional information

This work was partly funded as part of the BRIDGE project by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) IP Nr. IST-FP6-033546.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, T.S., Ranasinghe, D.C., Patkai, B. et al. Taxonomy, technology and applications of smart objects. Inf Syst Front 13, 281–300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9218-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9218-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation