Abstract
Purpose
To determine the area of the surface foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in children with posterior microphthalmos (PM), high hyperopia, and normal eyes using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA).
Methods
Thirty-six children were studied including 6 cases 12 eyes of PM (mean age 9.5 ± 5.2 years), 15 cases 30 eyes of high hyperopia (6.9 ± 1.5 years), and 15 cases 30 eyes of healthy individuals (8.7 ± 1.7 years). The B- and C-scan images in all children were recorded by OCT and OCTA with a scanning area of 3.0 × 3.0 mm centered on the fovea. All images were corrected for axial length differences, and the area of the FAZ surface and central macular thickness (CMT) was measured manually and compared.
Results
The area of FAZ in the PM group was 0.007 ± 0.003 mm2, which was significantly smaller than that in the high hyperopia eyes at 0.286 ± 0.108 mm2 and healthy eyes at 0.318 ± 0.129 mm2 (both P < 0.001). The CMT in the PM group was 401.58 ± 33.60 mm, which was significantly thicker than in the high hyperopia eyes at 202.93 ± 12.28 mm and the normal eyes at 204.43 ± 18.76 mm. The area of the FAZ and CMT in the hyperopia group did not differ significantly from that of the normal healthy eyes.
Conclusion
These findings indicate that patients with PM have a hypoplastic macular region, which must be considered in any treatment of these eyes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (Kozue Sasaki), upon reasonable request.
References
Elder MJ (1994) Aetiology of severe visual impairment and blindness in microphthalmos. Br J Ophthalmol 78:332–334. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.78.5.332
Duke-Elder S, Wybar KC Vol. VI (ed Stewart Duke-Elder) Ch. XIII, 513–534 (Henry Kimpton, 1973).
Relhan N et al (2016) High-hyperopia database, part I: clinical characterisation including morphometric (biometric) differentiation of posterior microphthalmos from nanophthalmos. Eye (Lond) 30:120–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.206
Zor KR, Kucuk E, Gunaydin NT, Onder F (2019) Ocular findings in posterior microphthalmos. Saudi J Ophthalmol 33:41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.10.007
Boynton JR, Purnell EW (1975) Bilateral microphthalmos without microcornea associated with unusual papillomacular retinal folds and high hyperopia. Am J Ophthalmol 79:820–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(75)90743-6
Spitznas M, Gerke E, Bateman JB (1983) Hereditary posterior microphthalmos with papillomacular fold and high hyperopia. Arch Ophalmol 101:413–417. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010413014
Nowilaty SR, Mousa A, Ghazi NG (2013) The posterior pole and papillomacular fold in posterior microphthalmos: novel spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings. Ophthalmology 120:1656–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.026
Kida Y, Kurome H, Hayasaka S (1995) Bilateral microphthalmos with poor visual acuity, high hyperopia, and papillomacular retinal folds in siblings. Jpn J Ophthalmol 39:177–179
Chui TYP, VanNasdale DA, Elsner AE, Burns SA (2014) The association between the foveal avascular zone and retinal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15446
Tan CS et al (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography evaluation of the parafoveal vasculature and its relationship with ocular factors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:OCT224–OCT234. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-18869
Karkhaneh R, Masoumi A, Ebrahimiadib N, Chams H, Abrishami M (2019) Multimodal imaging in posterior microphthalmos. J Curr Ophthalmol 31:335–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2019.01.001
Nitta C, Takemura T, Nitta M (2019) Ages related changes of refractive components during the age of ocular development from 3-to 18-years old. Folia Jpn de Ophthalmol 12:298–306
Meyer CH, Lapolice DJ, Freedman SF (2002) Foveal hypoplasia in oculocutaneous albinism demonstrated by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 133:409–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01326-5
Liu JJ, Chen YY, Zhang X, Zhao PQ (2018) Clinical features of posterior microphthalmic and nanophthalmic eyes. Int J Ophthalmol 11:1829–1834. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.11.15
Dubis AM et al (2012) Relationship between the foveal avascular zone and foveal pit morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:1628–1636. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8488
Pakzad-Vaezi K, Keane PA, Cardoso JN, Egan C, Tufail A (2017) Optical coherence tomography angiography of foveal hypoplasia. Br J Ophthalmol 101:985–988. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309200
Funding
This study was supported by Grands-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists, Scientific Research (A) and (B), Challenging Exploratory Research, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 19K20728 (MH), 18H04116 (MH), 20K04271 (MH), 19K21783 (MH), Charitable Trust Fund for Ophthalmic Research in Commemoration of Santen Pharmaceutical's Founder (MH), and Takeda Science Foundation (MH).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no competing interests.
Animal research
Not applicable.
Consent to participants
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after the nature, and possible risks of the study were explained to them. This investigation was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The experimental protocol and consent procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Teikyo University (approval no. 19–262).
Consent to Publish
All authors’ agreement was consent to publish before publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sasaki, K., Sasaki, K., Hirota, M. et al. Comparisons of size of foveal avascular zone area among children with posterior microphthalmos, high hyperopia, and normal eyes. Int Ophthalmol 42, 2599–2607 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02250-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02250-4